Shirley English
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
As rejection letters go, it would have taken some beating. The publishers of Charles Darwin’s seminal work, On the Origin of Species, considered turning down his manuscript and asking him to write about pigeons instead.
The near-miss was unearthed in 150-year-old correspondence between Darwin’s publisher, John Murray, and a clergyman, the Rev Whitwell Elwin. Elwin was one of Murray’s special advisers, part of a literary panel that was the Victorian equivalent of a modern focus group.
He was asked by the London publisher for his opinion of Darwin’s new work, which challenged Old Testament ideas of Creation. Unsurprisingly for a man of the cloth, Elwin disapproved. Writing back from his rectory in Norwich on May 3, 1859, he urged Murray not to publish. Darwin’s theories were so farfetched, prejudiced and badly argued that right-thinking members of the public would never believe them, he said. “At every page I was tantalised by the absence of the proofs,” Elwin wrote, adding that the “harder and drier” writing style was also off-putting.
He suggested that Darwin’s earlier observations on pigeons should be made into a book as “everybody is interested in pigeons”. He enthused: “The book would be received in every journal in the kingdom and would soon be on every table.”
Fortunately, Murray chose to ignore the advice. He went on to publish On the Origin of Species. The rest, as they say, is history.
The letters are among more than 150,000 literary items that form the vast John Murray archive, a collection of documents from some of the greatest thinkers of the 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries.
Built up over seven generations of the publishing family, and valued at £45 million, the collection is now housed at the National Library of Scotland in Edinburgh.
It includes manuscripts, private letters and journals from such figures as Jane Austen, Lord Byron, Benjamin Disraeli, Sir Walter Scott, David Livingstone and Darwin.
It was offered to the nation last year at the reduced price of £31.2 million and was bought with the help of the Heritage Lottery Fund and the Scottish Executive. However, there was a £6.5 million shortfall.
Since the archive moved from London to Edinburgh last March, more than £1.5 million has been raised by anonymous private donations, ranging from “£5 to just under £1 million”, said Giles Dove, the national library’s director of development.
But £5 million is still needed to meet the asking price, which must be paid in full within 3½ years.
Sir Sean Connery and the Edinburgh author Ian Rankin joined the library in announcing a public appeal yesterday to raise the final balance. Sir Sean, who visited the archive last summer, said that it was of “world-class importance”. A library spokesman refused to say whether the actor had made a donation.
Rankin, who will speak at the Edinburgh fundraising launch tonight, said that the archive was a “vast and unique treasure trove”, and one of the most important literary collections in the world.
A public exhibition featuring 11 writers from the John Murray archive will open at the National Library of Scotland at the end of June.

Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Very good idea that publisher`s corrspondence is now available to public.Reader will learn background of publishing history.
There is nothing new that people alway opposed to new idea,all great thinkers faced this kind of opposition.
Ramesh Raghuvanshi, Pune, Maharastra[India]
I wouldn't be too harsh on Elwin. It does not look like he was against publication because the ideas of the book were conflicting with established religious dogma. He seemed to be concerned with popularity, and therefore profit. It is clear from his quote that Elwin couldn't understand what Darwin was trying to put forward.
Well, I could be mistaken. Elwin could be disguising his interests by appealing to the profit sense of the publisher... it would not be the first time religious use this tactic. In effect this is one of the favorite techniques of people that have to disguise their real objectives.
Paulo Zappi, Melbourne, Australia
This news, together with the fact that Darwin himself held off publication for many years because of his fear of offending religious people, shows the way that concern for offending religious sensibility can have in holding back knowledge.
We can still see this operating today where many people react negatively to debate and criticism (normally essential to the advance of ideas) when religious beliefs are involved.
As Richard Dawkins says most people assume that religious faith is especially vulnerable to offence and should be protected by an abnormally thick wall of respect. Religion receives a privilege not granted to other beliefs such as those of politics, sport, science or atheism. A brief survey of reviews of recent books by atheist authors such as Dawkins shows this attitude is common amongst non-religious as well as religious people.
Ken, Hamilton, New Zealand
Ah, Chris, but you see I have no objection to being consigned to the dustbin of history as a 'non-survivor' if my constitution proves too weak to cope with the raised blood pressure resulting from having to listen to other people's myths. The real worry is that such people are beginning to again exert significant power in high places and are given undue "respect" merely for dressing up in robes and spouting an archaic litany
Bob Finbow, Haverhill, England
Calm down Bob, a heart attack often leads to a abrupt end of evolution for the sufferor
Chris, Hong Kong,
It absolutely beggers belief that a clergyman, who presumably believed resolutely in the bible, should criticise Darwin's 'Origin' in the grounds of At every page I was tantalised by the absence of the proofs! If ever there was a more obvious case of the pot calling the kettle black I really can't imagine it. And Darwin, like any scientist, was not claiming irrefutable truth. He was putting forward a valid hypothesis based on observation. The fact that in 150 years no-one has come close to disproving it, and its predictions have been demonstrated to be accurate time and time again makes it a far better claimant for being the truth than does the bible. Thanks goodness the church no long controls the organs of information.
Bob Finbow, Haverhill, England
Elwin's comment is interesting: At every page I was tantalised by the absence of the proofs, - isn't that true of most religious texts as well?
Vaughan Morgan-Jones, Leicester, England