Ben Hoyle, Arts Reporter
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
Publishers are preparing to put reading age guidelines on the covers of all children’s books in an important breakthrough for children’s literacy.
Some of the main companies in the children’s book market have made the decision after two years of consultation with parents, young readers and literacy experts. The information will appear as a recommended age band.
The rest of the industry is expected to follow suit and the bands, which categorise books by reading age as Early (for five years plus), Developing (7 plus) Confident (9 plus) and Fluent, could become industry standards next year. The scheme would bring books into line with toys, DVDs and video games, which all carry age guidelines.
Research suggests that many adults who want to buy children books do not know which are suitable. Studies have also revealed that one in five 11-year-olds leaves primary school unable to read to the minimum standard and one in six leaves school without functional literacy or numeracy skills.
Publishing industry politics has hampered the adoption of a standard system of bands, but the involvement of Amanda Ross, the television executive who created the Richard and Judy Book Club, has accelerated the process.
Ms Ross took up the cause of child literacy while working on Channel 4’s Lost for Words campaign in October. A Richard and Judy Children’s Book Clubspecial, part of the week-long series of programmes, divided its books into the four bands now proposed.
Ms Ross was at Downing Street yesterday with the authors Joanna Trollope, Kate Mosse, Tony Parsons and Sophie Kinsella to present a petition to the Prime Minister calling for action to combat child illiteracy. More than 500 writers signed the petition.
The idea of banding has suffered from what proved to be a false perception in the book trade that older children would be discouraged from reading a book that had a reading age on it, Ms Ross said.
Amanda Craig, the children’s books critic for The Times, said: “Anything that helps parents to choose books for their children is a good thing.”

Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Pehaps a peel-off label would be a useful compromise
Ros, Diss, UK
I agree with those in opposition I appreciate the argument that parents will put more pressure on a child to read beyond a level they're comfortable with, destroying any future interest in reading. The labels are poorly chosen with "confident" most offensive- belittling to those who aren't.
Mamie Anthoine Ney, South Berwick, ME, USA
I think putting an age on anything is demoralizing to the object and the user. I think reading levels are great because it gives a child something to work towards while not stigmatizing them if they find something interesting at a level they have surpassed and what to enjoy.
Danielle Jones, portland, United States
The best way of knowing if a book is suitable for your child is to know your child and look closely at the book. No literacy expert sitting in an office far away is going to know what makes your child tick. It also fuels parental anxiety and competitiveness and risks spoiling the magic of reading. I often hear mothers say "That book is too easy for you. You must choose something harder!" as if they never relax with something undemanding after a long day at work.
Mrs Richards, Headcorn, England
It is difficult to see how this idea could in any way help children. A child's reading age, like its mental age, has nothing to do with the number of years it has been on the planet. This is an utterly pointless idea which, while no doubt well meant, will achieve nothing and may actually produce the opposite effect to that intended.
Dan Allen, Newbury,
What a lot of nonsense. It will be used against both children with difficulties reading, by implying that they are reading 'baby books' and 'should' be on something too difficult for them, and children with good reading skills, both by implying that they should be 'beyond' old favourites and that they should not be reading ahead of their supposed 'correct' level. If parents are unsure of what is suitable (and their children's tastes should be their first guide) they should check with their local library or bookstore staff, or even their child's teacher who will surely have a more accurate idea of what is available, popular and suitable for the child than a generic band at the back of a book.
e. Thompson, Vancouver, canada