Dalya Alberge, Arts Correspondent
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition

Those who questioned whether reading was high on the list of the singer Lily Allen’s recreations appeared to be vindicated yesterday when the organisers of the £30,000 Orange Prize for fiction admitted that they had dropped her from their panel of judges after she failed to turn up to meetings.
Eyebrows were raised last year when the 22-year-old singer was controversially appointed to the judging team for the highbrow prize.
Reading books seems to have proved too much for Allen, a popular party girl who had a No 1 hit with Smile and regularly features in the gossip columns. At the time of her appointment, critics observed that serious writers had been sacrificed in the pursuit of celebrity.
Kirsty Lang, chairman of this year’s panel, insisted that Allen had been a good choice of judge, and that the critics who had disparaged her were “being snobby and elitist”.
“Life got in the way,” she told The Times. “She lost a baby, her boyfriend left her and she was launching a new TV show. She was under a hell of a lot of pressure. She found the pressure of judging a major book prize on top of everything else too much.”
The singer had taken part in drawing up the longlist “by phone”, she added. “She reads, she writes her own songs. She’s a wordsmith.”
Lang went on to announce the shortlist of six authors chosen by the remaining judges, Lisa Allardice, review editor of The Guardian, the novelist Philippa Gregory and the novelist and journalist Bel Mooney.
In the year that both the Man Booker and the Costa literary awards were won by women, the women-only Orange Prize failed yesterday to shortlist either of those winners.
Anne Enright, the Irish author whose The Gathering won the £50,000 Booker, and A. L. Kennedy, the Scot whose Day won the £30,000 Costa, topped the list of absentees from the shortlist. There were also no places for Deborah Moggach or Linda Grant, a former Orange winner. Both were among the 20 contenders on the Orange longlist last month.
Instead, the judges include three debut novelists with the established writer Rose Tremain.
Among the first-timers is the Briton Sadie Jones, 40, chosen for The Outcast, a portrait of small-town hypocrisy described by The Times as “elegantly written”.
Getting on to the shortlist was rewarding, Jones said, as she had struggled to find recognition as a screenwriter. She had managed to cope with the rejection by writing “to stay sane” and paid the bills by temping, working as a waitress and doing other odd jobs.
The Orange judges were struck by Jones’s ability to evoke “a sense of period, postwar Britain, and stifling middle-class hypocrisy”. Lang said: “We can see this book as a film.” Jones first wrote the story as a screenplay, one of many that failed to get beyond the manuscript stage.
The Orange Broadband Prize for Fiction, now in its 13th year, celebrates excellence, originality and accessibility in women’s writing around the world. Another first-timer is the Canadian Heather O’Neill, for Lullabies for Little Criminals, and an American, Patricia Wood, for Lottery.
The judges chose another Canadian author, Nancy Huston, for Fault Lines, her eleventh novel, and the British Charlotte Mendelson for her third novel, When We Were Bad, a story about Liberal Jews in England.
Tremain was selected for her tenth novel, The Road Home, a story about Lev, a modern-day economic migrant from Poland.
The shortlist was announced weeks after leading authors questioned whether there was any need for the Orange Prize when women writers were winning prizes in fair competition with men.
A. S. Byatt told The Times that the Orange was a “sexist prize” and that she had forbidden her publishers from submitting her novels.
The winner will be announced at a ceremony at the Royal Festival Hall in London on June 4.

Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Pete from NW London captures it perfectly and even by posting a comment about it here we are adding to the erosion of that we wish to preserve.
Just because someone can speak doesn't bestow on them the moniker of 'wordsmith'.
Jonas McAuley, London,
In the picture of Lily Allen on Wednesday 16th April, she was wearing a fab pair of pink sunglasses. Does anyone know where she got them from?
Comments back would really be apreciated :)
DLJ, Cambs, East
It's as if at a certain stage in a process of social decay, a point is reached where so much about absurd reality is beyond satire.
Pete, NW London,
Casper, I'm sure even Lily would be able to spell 'today' correctly.
Ledwith, Edinburgh,
After the year Lilly Allen has had, I think the last thing on her mind is being an Orange Prize judge.
She has also already pulled out of a summer music festival - her main area of work - because of other commitments (mainly her new album). It shouldn't be a surprise that she feels unable to devote the time to judging a large number of books. In fact, credit to her for pulling out, when the easier course of action would have been to do the job half heartedly and blag it for some spurious intellectual credibility.
But why all the fuss about the Orange Prize anyway? How many of these books will be remembered by anyone in a year's time? How many recent Booker prize winners can most people name?
Roy Pinney, Weston Super Mare,
Mary, Marseille, I have 3 issues:
1. Losing a chid, sad as it so obviously is, does not mean one cannot criticise this talentless daughter-of-somebody for aspects that have nothing to do with her pregnancy. She is 100% fake, purporting to be some discovery made on the internet from a hard up council estate, when she was brought up by rich parents, went to Bedales, and her record company arranged the whole internet thing as a marketing campaign.
2. Drawing attention to a prize on the basis of idiocy and ignorance is NOT to be applauded. Her inclusion would have no effect on "getting kids interested in books".
3. What makes you think this brain-empty woman (have you actually heard her trying to conduct a conversation on that appalling chat show of hers?) could appreciate "a broad spectrum of styles and themes"?
She is a talentless, ignorant, dreadful fraud.
Laura Roberts, London, UK
Er, writing a three minute repetitive song is a little different to writing a 300 page landscape of characters and themes.
Authors who spend years crafting lengthy and complex stories should not have to be judged by a young woman with no novel or fiction writing background.
Everyone has his or her opinion, true, but would you have anyone and everyone judging a serious literary competition?
I mean, would a car mechanic judge an F1 competition?
Will Axe, london, uk
I see 3 issues here :
1. It truly disgusts me that people want to knock a young girl that has suffered so badly in recent times.
2. So maybe she was selected as a token "young people's icon", so what ? If it draws attention to the prize and encourages kids to take more of an interest in books then the decision to include her on the panel should have been applauded.
3. It would seem to me that a judge should generally be capable of appreciating a broad spectrum of styles and themes, as such the narrow-minded people that shun Lily Allen would obviously make very poor judges themselves.
Mary, Marseille,
I don't think that I have ever heard a lily Allen song, but I have seen her on a television chat show, and she was intelligent, articulate, and entertaining.
Obviously these are not appropriate qualities for the quango that selects Orange judges.
J Laflin, Bicknoller,
I was amused by this story untill I noticed that the prize is awarded in part, on originality and accessibility. This is no disqulification of the ladies invitation to judge, for her song writing and sucess indicates a fair grasp of both. Why take this so seriously ?
Their prize,their rules.
robert everitt, wolverhampton,
Jolly nice picture though.
Mark, camberley, surrey
"Whenever you see me you say that you want me back
And I tell you it don't mean jack, no it don't mean jack"
Next Poet Laureate if you ask me.
Sean, London,
'Kirsty Lang..insisted that...critics who had been disparaging of [Lily Allen] were âbeing snobby and elitistâ.'
Poor Kirsty - she doesn't get it: without snobbery and elitism (read high aspiration), there is no quality.
John Stitch, London,
Competitors probably demanded the ejection of Lily Allen. If they had won, their endorsement by Lily Allen might have debased their literary currency. Miss Lang should give up on those so last century excuses of 'snobbism and elitism'.
If a prize is to be given for literary excellence by its nature it is 'elitist'
jd, London,
I don't know the Lily Allen timeline but I suspect none of those mitigating factors prevented her from launching a show on BBC3, working for New Look, or kept her out of the newspapers so it's perhaps more a question of priorities and motivation.
Jon, North West, UK
I cant say whats going on in Lily Allens life but her selection as a judge in the first place speaks volumes.
The Orange prize will never be seen as a heavyweight prize if you get lightweight judges (Lily Allen - how many more better than her can you find on Youtube?). Who will be selected to replace her? Scooby-do? Bungle from Rainbow (Im that old)? I bet serious women writers couldnt wait to be judged by Lily Allen. JK Rowling and the Bronte sisters really missed out.
Ive nothing against Lily but she represents everything the Orange Prize is meant to eradicate. Talent should go rewarded and pulp should be passed by.
Women still have a tougher time then men in nearly all aspects of today. Im not sure that the Orange prize shall overcome this or inspire women to turn to writing, unless of course they see someone like Lily Allen as a role model.
Dont bother sending your polished literary works to publishers - think up some cheap and catchy words then put them on Youtube instead.
Jack Sprat, Bristol, UK
Oh God, give the girl a break. She had a miscarriage, her boyfriend left her, and she dyed her hair blonde. I think she's allowed a little slack.
I mean, yes of COURSE she was included as a judge to try and make the Orange Prize more hip and yoof-friendly and sexy, and to maybe try and get people Lily's age interested in reading books rather than playing Playstations.
With the greatest of respect to the remaining Orange judges, Lily isn't a great "wordsmith". Writing song lyrics to sing over the top of your faux-Caribbean music isn't quite the same as writing a novel, is it? (or should I say, "innit"?).
I'm sure her perspective would have been just as valid as anyone else, but whether she could've coped with the punishing schedule of reading 100 books and going to judging meetings with women twice her age is another story.
It's another sad example of a young person with talent being shepherded by a pushy agent into being a multi-media celeb. Give 'er a break!
Jay, London,
I'm not sure that writing trite little pop songs qualifies her as a "wordsmith". Or maybe in toady's dumbed down Britain it does!
Casper Slides, London,