Dalya Alberge, Arts Correspondent
Win tickets to the ultimate village fete with welly wanging and more

Those who questioned whether reading was high on the list of the singer Lily Allen’s recreations appeared to be vindicated yesterday when the organisers of the £30,000 Orange Prize for fiction admitted that they had dropped her from their panel of judges after she failed to turn up to meetings.
Eyebrows were raised last year when the 22-year-old singer was controversially appointed to the judging team for the highbrow prize.
Reading books seems to have proved too much for Allen, a popular party girl who had a No 1 hit with Smile and regularly features in the gossip columns. At the time of her appointment, critics observed that serious writers had been sacrificed in the pursuit of celebrity.
Kirsty Lang, chairman of this year’s panel, insisted that Allen had been a good choice of judge, and that the critics who had disparaged her were “being snobby and elitist”.
“Life got in the way,” she told The Times. “She lost a baby, her boyfriend left her and she was launching a new TV show. She was under a hell of a lot of pressure. She found the pressure of judging a major book prize on top of everything else too much.”
The singer had taken part in drawing up the longlist “by phone”, she added. “She reads, she writes her own songs. She’s a wordsmith.”
Lang went on to announce the shortlist of six authors chosen by the remaining judges, Lisa Allardice, review editor of The Guardian, the novelist Philippa Gregory and the novelist and journalist Bel Mooney.
In the year that both the Man Booker and the Costa literary awards were won by women, the women-only Orange Prize failed yesterday to shortlist either of those winners.
Anne Enright, the Irish author whose The Gathering won the £50,000 Booker, and A. L. Kennedy, the Scot whose Day won the £30,000 Costa, topped the list of absentees from the shortlist. There were also no places for Deborah Moggach or Linda Grant, a former Orange winner. Both were among the 20 contenders on the Orange longlist last month.
Instead, the judges include three debut novelists with the established writer Rose Tremain.
Among the first-timers is the Briton Sadie Jones, 40, chosen for The Outcast, a portrait of small-town hypocrisy described by The Times as “elegantly written”.
Getting on to the shortlist was rewarding, Jones said, as she had struggled to find recognition as a screenwriter. She had managed to cope with the rejection by writing “to stay sane” and paid the bills by temping, working as a waitress and doing other odd jobs.
The Orange judges were struck by Jones’s ability to evoke “a sense of period, postwar Britain, and stifling middle-class hypocrisy”. Lang said: “We can see this book as a film.” Jones first wrote the story as a screenplay, one of many that failed to get beyond the manuscript stage.
The Orange Broadband Prize for Fiction, now in its 13th year, celebrates excellence, originality and accessibility in women’s writing around the world. Another first-timer is the Canadian Heather O’Neill, for Lullabies for Little Criminals, and an American, Patricia Wood, for Lottery.
The judges chose another Canadian author, Nancy Huston, for Fault Lines, her eleventh novel, and the British Charlotte Mendelson for her third novel, When We Were Bad, a story about Liberal Jews in England.
Tremain was selected for her tenth novel, The Road Home, a story about Lev, a modern-day economic migrant from Poland.
The shortlist was announced weeks after leading authors questioned whether there was any need for the Orange Prize when women writers were winning prizes in fair competition with men.
A. S. Byatt told The Times that the Orange was a “sexist prize” and that she had forbidden her publishers from submitting her novels.
The winner will be announced at a ceremony at the Royal Festival Hall in London on June 4.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers


Pick up new releases when you buy The Times or The Sunday Times
2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
F/1989
£36,000
Hollingworth At Ombersley
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
90K plus bonus plus options
Confidential
London
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
£40,000 - £50,000 + benefits
Lloyds Pharmacy
Coventry
£38k
Barclaycard
Various Locations
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Pete from NW London captures it perfectly and even by posting a comment about it here we are adding to the erosion of that we wish to preserve.
Just because someone can speak doesn't bestow on them the moniker of 'wordsmith'.
Jonas McAuley, London,
In the picture of Lily Allen on Wednesday 16th April, she was wearing a fab pair of pink sunglasses. Does anyone know where she got them from?
Comments back would really be apreciated :)
DLJ, Cambs, East
It's as if at a certain stage in a process of social decay, a point is reached where so much about absurd reality is beyond satire.
Pete, NW London,
Casper, I'm sure even Lily would be able to spell 'today' correctly.
Ledwith, Edinburgh,
After the year Lilly Allen has had, I think the last thing on her mind is being an Orange Prize judge.
She has also already pulled out of a summer music festival - her main area of work - because of other commitments (mainly her new album). It shouldn't be a surprise that she feels unable to devote the time to judging a large number of books. In fact, credit to her for pulling out, when the easier course of action would have been to do the job half heartedly and blag it for some spurious intellectual credibility.
But why all the fuss about the Orange Prize anyway? How many of these books will be remembered by anyone in a year's time? How many recent Booker prize winners can most people name?
Roy Pinney, Weston Super Mare,
Mary, Marseille, I have 3 issues:
1. Losing a chid, sad as it so obviously is, does not mean one cannot criticise this talentless daughter-of-somebody for aspects that have nothing to do with her pregnancy. She is 100% fake, purporting to be some discovery made on the internet from a hard up council estate, when she was brought up by rich parents, went to Bedales, and her record company arranged the whole internet thing as a marketing campaign.
2. Drawing attention to a prize on the basis of idiocy and ignorance is NOT to be applauded. Her inclusion would have no effect on "getting kids interested in books".
3. What makes you think this brain-empty woman (have you actually heard her trying to conduct a conversation on that appalling chat show of hers?) could appreciate "a broad spectrum of styles and themes"?
She is a talentless, ignorant, dreadful fraud.
Laura Roberts, London, UK
Er, writing a three minute repetitive song is a little different to writing a 300 page landscape of characters and themes.
Authors who spend years crafting lengthy and complex stories should not have to be judged by a young woman with no novel or fiction writing background.
Everyone has his or her opinion, true, but would you have anyone and everyone judging a serious literary competition?
I mean, would a car mechanic judge an F1 competition?
Will Axe, london, uk
I see 3 issues here :
1. It truly disgusts me that people want to knock a young girl that has suffered so badly in recent times.
2. So maybe she was selected as a token "young people's icon", so what ? If it draws attention to the prize and encourages kids to take more of an interest in books then the decision to include her on the panel should have been applauded.
3. It would seem to me that a judge should generally be capable of appreciating a broad spectrum of styles and themes, as such the narrow-minded people that shun Lily Allen would obviously make very poor judges themselves.
Mary, Marseille,
I don't think that I have ever heard a lily Allen song, but I have seen her on a television chat show, and she was intelligent, articulate, and entertaining.
Obviously these are not appropriate qualities for the quango that selects Orange judges.
J Laflin, Bicknoller,
I was amused by this story untill I noticed that the prize is awarded in part, on originality and accessibility. This is no disqulification of the ladies invitation to judge, for her song writing and sucess indicates a fair grasp of both. Why take this so seriously ?
Their prize,their rules.
robert everitt, wolverhampton,
I'm not sure that writing trite little pop songs qualifies her as a "wordsmith". Or maybe in toady's dumbed down Britain it does!
Casper Slides, London,
- 1
- 2
Next