John Carey
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times
Britain in the aftermath of the second world war is remembered as a land of hope and progress. The 1945 Labour landslide opened the way for the welfare state and the National Health Service. Old injustices began to melt away. David Kynaston’s prolific and engrossing study reveals how the postwar years seemed to ordinary people who lived through them, and it becomes clear that they were hungrier, colder, dirtier, sadder and more hopeless than anything we can adequately imagine from our pampered vantage-point in time.
After five years of war, people were exhausted, undernourished and, thanks to clothes rationing, poorly clad. The rations of basic foods – meat, cheese, fats, sugar, tea – seemed punitively small (the bacon ration in 1949, for example, was 1oz per week), and bread, which had been exempt from rationing during the war, was now rationed. Queues formed outside bakers’ shops early each morning. There were bombed-out buildings everywhere, and the grime of destruction permeated furniture, clothes, skin and hair. Over a third of Britain’s 12m dwellings had no bath or hot water. The icy winter of 1946-7, coupled with a coal shortage, reduced many to despair. Longer-term problems remained too. All the big cities had verminous slums, and unchecked pollution lay like a deadly pall over the industrial areas.
Kynaston’s method is to take us through year by year, charting first the political initiatives and then the public reaction, as recorded in diaries, letters and the invaluable Mass Observation archive. The pattern is always the same. The politicians’ claims are exorbitant, and the public response is fatalistic, jaded and sceptical. When the public does show a decided preference, the politicians ignore it. This was most evident in relation to the housing shortage. Surveys made it overwhelmingly clear that most people wanted to live in a suburban house with a garden. The politicians and planners, on the other hand, were convinced that 60-storey blocks of flats, as recommended by Le Corbusier, were the ideal habitat for human beings. So that became the official policy, and local protests were overruled. “It’s no good your jeering: it is going to be done,” Lewis Silkin, the minister of town and country planning, told an unruly public meeting in Stevenage. There were cries of “Gestapo” and “dictator”, and when he returned to his ministerial car he found that someone had deflated the tyres and put sand in the petrol tank.
Outrages of this kind made it clear that the British public must be converted into a more serious-minded, socialist people, working, as Herbert Morrison put it, in “an altogether different atmosphere of ideas”. How this could be achieved was much debated. The leading Labour thinker Evan Durbin suggested that “selective breeding was probably the answer”. Meanwhile, despite all the fiery socialist rhetoric, the one decisive and democratic step that could have changed British society was not taken. With its huge majority, and a bewildered upper class that had not had time to regroup, Labour could, Kynaston points out, have seized the moment to abolish the most important source of political, social and economic privilege, the public schools. It did not do so because its leadership was itself steeped in privilege. Prime Minister Attlee was a devout old Haileyburian, and he told the school, on a visit in 1947, that he hoped the “great traditions” of the public schools would continue and “might even be extended”
The Britain that Kynaston describes was poor and miserable, and the most useful lesson his book teaches is that poverty and misery breed intolerance. We are infinitely more tolerant than our counterparts 50 years back, not because we have received some mysterious influx of moral enlightenment, but because we are more prosperous. Surveys showed that in Kynaston’s Britain a majority condemned premarital and extramarital sex. Divorce was an unthinkable social disgrace. Homosexuals were defamed and persecuted. When the first black immigrants from the West Indies arrived in 1948, reaction was swift. “Regret No Coloureds” notices went up in London boarding houses, and in Liverpool a white mob attacked a black seamen’s hostel. Asked to explain their prejudice, few whites could muster even a pretence at rationality. “Don’t know; can’t say, just dislike them”, was a popular reply. Prejudice against the disabled was similarly strong and irrational. At the 1948 London Olympics, the cox of the British rowing VIII, who had lost a leg as a boy, was banned from taking part in the initial parade of athletes.
It was prosperity, together with technology, that changed the lot of women. In Kynaston’s Britain their inferiority was taken for granted, even by women. Woman’s Hour, which began in 1946, was presented by a man, and the BBC ordained that only men could read news bulletins. Of the 1,700 candidates in the 1945 election, 87 were women. The wages of women who worked were on average half what men received, and the male-dominated trades unions took no interest in righting this wrong. Most women did not have jobs. Films, radio and women’s magazines all emphasised that their place was in the home. They occupied themselves in queuing, in the time-wasting round of small-scale shopping, and in the laborious routines of wash-day, involving a coal-fired copper and a hand-turned mangle. Gleams of their future freedom came with the opening of Britain’s first launderette in 1949 and the appearance, a year later, of Sainsbury’s first supermarket – it was in Croydon, and an early customer, a judge’s wife, swore violently at Alan (later Lord) Sainsbury for requiring her to do the job of a shop assistant.
Foreign food and foreign travel were other symptoms of prosperity that broadened the British mind and taught us tolerance. A Gallup poll in 1949 revealed that most people’s idea of a luxury meal was tomato soup, roast chicken and trifle. Elizabeth David’s A Book of Mediterranean Food the following year switched attention to olives, apricots, rice, lemons, oil and almonds, which, it seemed to her, were “dirty words” to Britons. In travel, the pioneer was the Russian émigré Vladimir Raitz. Almost everyone who could afford a holiday in the postwar years went by train to a British seaside resort. A photograph of chilled holiday-makers cowering under shacks constructed out of deck chairs on Margate beach in 1948 is the most poignant in this book. Raitz’s company Horizon Holidays took 20 Britons to Corsica on a chartered Dakota in 1950 – the first package holiday. They were, he stressed, “people like teachers, the middle classes”. Over the next few years, his destinations included Benidorm, which had, at the time, one hotel.
Even readers who can remember the years Kynaston writes about will find they are continually surprised by the richness and diversity of his material. Who would have guessed, for example, that the die-hards and carpers who denounced the inauguration of the National Health Service included the Catholic church and the Manchester Guardian? Catholic hospitals opted out of the NHS on the grounds that charity was a religious concern and should not be taken over by the state. The Guardian’s worry was that state provision of health-care would eliminate natural selection, so that congenitally deformed and feckless people would survive. Austerity Britain is the first volume in a series entitled Tales of a New Jerusalem that will take the history of Britain up to the election of Margaret Thatcher in 1979. It is a mouth-watering start.
Bloomsbury £25 pp702
Available at the Sunday Times Books First price of £22.50 (inc p&p) on 0870 165 8585 Buy the book
How the new breed of location based mobile services can find your nearest cashpoint, restaurant or wi-fi hotspot
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Pick up new releases when you buy The Times or The Sunday Times
2006
£189,500
NW England
2008/08
£169,950
NW England
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool/Teeside
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Dining, Shopping & Riverside Pk
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
After reading this piece here in Seattle, I've decided the next time I go to our main library I'll ask if someone has written a similar book for that time here in the USA. I remember being told there was rationing during the war, but have heard nothing about it afterwards. But I know I grew up in New England (late 40s and 50s) in an era where females had much less value than today. (As you see, it still rankles.) I hope this book finds a publisher here.
Martha Tofferi, Seattle, WA, USA
There is some evidence that some aspects of wartime civilian life (such as food rationing and distribution) were much better handled during WW II than during WW I. Apparently the closest the nation has ever come to mass starvation was in 1916, due to our over-dependence on overseas food supplies which were severed by the successful German submarine blockade. Hence the inter-war and post-war drive to produce "Food From Our Own Resources" by improving Britain's farms and agricultural productivity.
The range of food then might seem narrow and unappetising to our eyes, but a recent study based on the National Food Survey confirmed that in nutritional terms the population was healthier in 1950 than in 2000 (strange as it may seem !)
david orchard, guildford, surrey
Surely 'unimaginably barbarous' (John Parfitt) is a bit much. Bleak and colourless maybe, but also in many ways also hopeful for many, the war being over, Young people particularly were looking forward, as they always do, and were preparing the way for the richer futures that they could not have foreseen - or hoped to obtain - before the war. The old and the comfortably off were less happy , but not for long on seeing what the future held for them too.
Phyllis Willmott, London, UK
Before World War I my father had been at school with children who had no footwear, and during that war food was scarce and badly distributed. Making do had been rife during the depression years many of the unemployed population lived exclusively in second-hand clothes and in those handed down from older children or cut down from those of parents.
What you feel about an era depends on whether you have experienced it or anything before it. When looked back on from the vantage point of 2007 the immediate post-WW II period must seem unimaginably barbarous. To many of those who had lived through world wars and the intervening economic and political disasters, it was an era of promise and gradual improvement.
John Parfitt, Bristol, England