Nicholas Rufford
Win tickets to the ultimate village fete with welly wanging and more

Next time the dinner party conversation stalls, throw in this question: which JB is best, Bond or Bourne? The air will quickly fill with opinion as men – especially men – align themselves with the figure in the tuxedo who suavely introduces himself as “Bond, James Bond”; or with Bourne, the unimposing guy in the fisherman’s jumper who doesn’t have any chat-up lines and can’t even remember his own name.
It’s five years since the release of The Bourne Identity, a film that helped redefine espionage thrillers. Centring on an amnesiac assassin named Jason Bourne, played by Matt Damon, it summed up the angst of a generation searching for an identity.
Bourne is on the run from a CIA “black ops” mob, and is pursued across Europe, treating cinema audiences to some impressive stunts and action sequences along the way. Meanwhile, he’s trying to answer the same question as the rest of us: “Who am I?” With the riddle still unresolved, he’s back later this month in The Bourne Ultimatum in the third part of a franchise that is challenging Bond’s dominance.
On the face of it, Bourne and Bond are polar opposites. Bond is MI6’s top agent; Bourne is being hunted down by his former employer, the CIA. Bond always gets the girl; Bourne loses his girl to an assassin’s bullet. Bond has no compunction about killing; Bourne has nightmares over what he’s done.
The contrast says a lot about their creators. Ian Fleming, an old Etonian, invented a hero to reflect the values of the day: successful, debonair, someone who kills as ruthlessly as he discards women. Robert Ludlum, a struggling actor turned writer, wanted an antihero, an outcast who was hunted, unsure of himself and paranoid.
The two authors lived a generation and a continent apart, but both were obsessives, prolific writers, heavy smokers (Fleming favoured custom-made cigarettes; Ludlum, Kool menthols). Fleming wrote 14 Bond books but saw just two made into films before a fatal heart attack, aged 56, in 1964.
Octopussy and The Living Daylights were short stories published posthumously. Later his estate licensed the Bond character to a succession of writers (including Kingsley Amis, Charlie Higson, one of the creators of The Fast Show, and most recently to Sebastian Faulks, the novelist, set to publish Devil May Care next year).
Ludlum turned to writing in 1970 when his acting career stagnated. He quickly became a master of his trade, selling more than 200m books – a figure reportedly exceeded only by J K Rowling. He died in 2001, with a rattling smoker’s cough, a year before the first Bourne film was released. Eric Van Lustbader, a writer with a name like one of Ludlum’s characters, is among those credited with the 12 “Ludlum” books that have appeared since.
Interestingly Bourne and Bond went global only after undergoing complete makeovers in the wake of their creators’ deaths. The Bond films were in any case only ever loosely based on Fleming’s narratives and when the stories ran out (The Living Daylights was the last one, in 1987), the film-makers cranked out another half dozen or so soundalike titles such as Licence to Kill.
Likewise, the film adaptation of the Bourne trilogy bears limited relation to Ludlum’s books, in which Bourne’s arch-foe is Carlos the Jackal (who hasn’t featured in the Bourne films). Tony Gilroy, the American screen-writer, took the basic idea of a character dragged from the Mediterranean with bullets in his back and a total loss of memory and wove around him new characters and plots.
Reinvented and reinvigorated, Bond and Bourne are cornering the market in espionage films. Casino Royale, the latest in the 007 series, grossed almost £294m, the highest earning Bond film ever (and the 36th highest grossing film of all time). The first two Bourne films took a not too shabby £245m at the box office and doubtless played a role in Bond’s latest success. In Casino Royale, the scriptwriters dumped the slapstick and wisecracks and adopted elements of film noir that have become Bourne’s trademark. Hence it was a much darker, bloodier Bond film than its predecessors.
Up until then, Albert “Cubby” Bro-colli and Barbara, his daughter, created lavish special effects, often using CGI for gimmicks such as the “invisible” Aston Martin in Die Another Day. Bond specialised in taking out his opponents in grisly but imaginative ways as, for example, in Live and Let Die when Roger Moore forced Yaphet Kotto’s Kananga to swallow a compressed air bullet, causing him to swell up like a giant beach ball and explode, remarking casually: “He always had an inflated opinion of himself.”
The Bourne camp, meanwhile, moved as far as it could in the opposite direction, avoiding CGI and adopting a shaky hand-held camera style to create a sense of realism. “Every time someone suggested doing something that was standard in the action world, we said we had to do the exact opposite,” says Frank Marshall, one of the Bourne producers.
Bourne is seldom armed with anything more deadly than a ballpoint pen. He shows how to clone a mobile phone in seconds and how to blow up a house by disconnecting a gas pipe then shoving a magazine into a toaster for a delayed timer.
Then there are the cars. Bond’s cars are all gleaming metal and clever gadgets. By contrast, Bourne drives a clapped out Leyland Mini with one wing hanging off in the first film. In the second he is pursued through Moscow in a battered Volga taxi. If Bourne arrived in one of his mangled wrecks at 007’s casino in Monte Carlo the security would suspect he was a car bomber.
For realism, all the Bourne chases take place in the kind of congested city streets with which audiences are familiar. According to Damon, the inspiration was The French Connection, which contained one of the best pursuits ever committed to celluloid.
The most important difference, though, is the inner man. In the 1960s, when Bond’s persona was formed, heroes didn’t cry or agonise over mistakes. Now it’s okay to have a soft side. Bourne struggles with demons from his past. In the Supremacy, for instance, he seeks out his victim’s daughter so he can apologise. That’s a tricky one for Bond to match. It’s difficult to see 007 transforming himself into a sensitive man by saying sorry for kicking Oddjob in his sensi-tiveman-parts before electrocuting him with a cut cable in Goldfinger.
Both Fleming and Ludlum reportedly had links to the respective intelligence services of their two countries. Fleming worked in naval intelligence where, among other deeds, he is credited with Operation Goldeneye (later the title of a Bond film), a plan to help defend Gibraltar during the second world war in the event that fascist Spain joined the Axis powers and invaded the British colony.
Ludlum’s novels contained details that implied an inside knowledge of the workings of the CIA, though he always denied any involvement. In terms of realism, though, Bourne has the edge. In The Bourne Identity, when a CIA director disapproves of the methods being used to try and assassinate Damon’s rogue operative, his subordinate turns on him and snarls, “So why don’t you book a conference room and talk him to death.” In The Bourne Ultimatum, a former field operative tells his desk-bound rival, “Don’t second guess an operation from an armchair.”
Like the drab War Office corridors in the film of Len Deighton’s Ipcress File it smacks of the truth, far more so than the shiny interior of Bond’s MI6 headquarters where 007 shares a tease with Moneypenny before M sends him off to blow up Blofeld’s underwater HQ in a mini-sub.
All of which leaves the most important question: who would win in a fight? Bourne is an expert in krav maga, the martial art used by Mossad. In close-quarter fighting he’s deadly. Sadly, that would be no match for Bond, who could press a button and dispatch Bourne with a harpoon through his fisherman’s jumper.
“It’s a tough question,” admits Damon. “I wouldn’t bet against Bourne. Bond does have all those gadgets, though.” So you can see there’s plenty to fuel the debate. Personally I’m a Bourne man – at least until I’m given the chance to drive an Aston Martin.
A tale of two spies
JAMES BOND
Employer MI6
Women. Innumerable, including Honey Rider (Ursula Andress) Pussy Galore (Honor Blackman) and Jinx Johnson (Halle Berry)
Weapons Beretta, later replaced by the German-made Walther PPK
Style Brioni Roma suits, Turnbull and Asser shirts, shoes by John Lobb
Cars Aston Martins, Lotus Esprit, BMW Z8
JASON BOURNE
Employer (ex): CIA
Women Marie Kreutz (Franka Potente), Bourne’s girlfriend, is shot by an assassin, leaving him companionless
Weapons Krav Maga martial art, plus anything handy: Biro, electrical flex, rolled up magazine
Style Jeans, T shirt, ex-army jacket
Cars Clapped out Leyland Mini, Volga taxi, Chevy Impala
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers



2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
F/1989
£36,000
Hollingworth At Ombersley
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
90K plus bonus plus options
Confidential
London
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
£40,000 - £50,000 + benefits
Lloyds Pharmacy
Coventry
£38k
Barclaycard
Various Locations
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Can anybody tell me the meaning of the word "FICTION"
C'mon, we will all pay to read about and / or watch both of these fictional characters...................
Tom, London, UK
Frankly, I can't see in Bourne anything else than Rambo pretending to be James Bond. In that case, even Austin Powers inspires more respect in the quality of his plots and films.
Doctor Evil, Manchester, England
Bourne is better because he is fighting against his dark side and only signed up to protect freedom for a government that was supposed to be of the people, for the people but turned out to be of the government, for the government. Today, on both sides of the Atlantic we can all relate to governments that has become too big, too taxing and too controlling, and governments that started out fighting for freedom that are now part of the problem. Bourne is the true patriot renegade that has the guts to stand up against personal and governmental evil. The story has now had 3 times with the same old bad CIA and it seems time to find a new villian. Perhaps, the good CIA lady will now need him to do a secret op that noone within the CIA can do due to a real internal bad guy who is hooked up with real bad guys outside the CIA. It would also be nice for there to be more connection with the real BOurne and of course he will get the CIA girl that loved him prior to his super secret op.
eric, Leavenworth, usa/wa
Bond is very existential and masculine. He pads around in the shower, leaves doors open and has to fight at the last moment. He is always betrayed, but he has to fight his way out. If he chooses the wrong move he is dead, and he is only funny at the end when he takes too much time off with the heroine. Bourne has to be ruthless too but he has more attuned instincts and knows in advance when danger threatens. He is guided by his subconscious and has mysteries which unfold gradually. This makes the action more taut as it is more subtle. He would not take any time off as he has finer instincts, and anyway, he is not beholden to anyone so he is infinitely free as long as he can remain alive and get the upper hand.
Diana, LONDON, UK
As for Bourne there was a limpid miniseries with Richard Camberlain in the late 80es.
The new Bond (D. Craig) has finally shown some guts while at the same time reaching out for the pink dollar, due to prejudiced punishment by my fellow dane Mads Mikkelsen.
Somehow Matt Damon looks mighty young to be a retired agent , just like Edward Norton in Red Dragon.
Ben Plummer, Copenhagen, Denmark
What about Jack Bauer - after all he revitalised the action man from ageing pot belly to one man up against it - & he gets hurt, has a life (sort of) and doesn't need the loo or food what more could you want.
Dali, London, UK
Are you kidding me? 007 is the best and I love jason bourne...
c.a. cantwell, naples, fl
I was hooked to Jason Bourne because he looks like an "everyman" yet he is very deadly. The Bond films are entertaining but lacked reality with one possible exception: From Russia with Love"; that was filmed in a more classic style of cloack and dagger. Bonds is in an elite by himself and no one could say he is an 'everyman". Casino Royale goes back to the From Russia With Love style and thus is more interesting to watch with bond being more vulnerable (he actually bleeds and hurts). The Bourne films thus far are more film noir; he a flawed, psychologichaly wounded human being who is also a weapon; he bleeds, has doubts, yet is instinctively ruthless. That makes interesting plots with more substantial characters involved thus making the story multidimensional. One watches Bourne as a real person, Bond does not give you that feeling. That is the difference between Bond and Bourne so far. I hope that the are more Bourne films as long as the dramatic quality remains high.
Alfonso A. Rodriguez, Miami, Florida
Bourne is better because it has a simpler and more sustainable formula. Bond needs world spaning scope and threat level. Like the TV show 24, the threats had to get bigger and more elaborate. The problem was it became harder to make the next one bigger and better. Bourne just needs 2 cages matches and 2 street fights and 3 spycraft competitions, one or two semi-rogue departments and they only have to believe that because they have the numbers and resources they can defeat Bourne and have a need to kill him.
Brian Wang, san ramon, CA
Bourne with probably a poison blow-dart as his weapon of choice, though no match against the AK-47 or the C-4 explosive.
Richard White, Buckingham, USA/Pennsylvania
Remember this: given all the killing by both men, neither ever even bruises an innocent. The viewer sympathizes with the JB's, as he can with Michael Corteleone, because these protagonists kill only baddies.
richard, west palm beach, fla
James Bond is the world's best greatest secret agent. But that doesn't means he's better than Jason Bourne. Everyone has its style .
Hagop, Aleppo, Syria
Bourne? Bond? I used to like bond, but as the writer says, he's gone too slick. Bourne is the real thing now. Matt Damon pulls it off perfectly.
mike, seattle, wa
Richard - "The viewer sympathizes with the JB's, as he can with Michael Corteleone, because these protagonists kill only baddies."
Disagree. As article points out, Bourne is haunted by his former deeds; he goes through much trouble in Supremacy to apologize to a girl whose innocent parents he kills. But only after an oxymoronic car chase through Moscow injuring untold fellow travelers and policeman justifiably attempting to apprehend a guy wreaking havoc in their streets. He could have surreptitiously sent her a cheap laptop with a video apology or directed her to an obscure upload on YouTube for the injury/trouble he caused.
Bond no Better: He often caused "collateral damage" to locals in exotic locations, but they were often patronizingly portrayed as buck-toothed idiots or opportunists in cahoots with the enemy to minimize any sympathy from the audience.
Just set aside putting them on moral pedestals and enjoy the ride.
Shawn, Chicago, IL, United States
Without a doubt, the Bourne epics are a class unto themselves. The intrigue of the first film seriously held audiences attention enough to support making the next 2 movies, but the third, in my opinion, is the best of them all. The Landy character, moved from agitatant to hero in the second film, plays a welcome subtle, even warm and caring element that is missing in the cold environment of the CIA leadership. Adding her instincts of his innocence aided in making the darker side of her bosses even more rewarding in the end. Jason Bourne is destined to become a classic and I would love to see his persona continued in a genre of films that challenges the long standing hold 007 has held in the, "WOW, did you see the latest", crowd,
Bob Adams, Myrtle Point, Oregon
Bomd antytime is better to enjoy---007 is never depressing to my eye>
Jay, stoneham, Ma
Who gives a crap? You know more about these fake spies than you know about Valerie Plame! Quick, name the brass plate operation that was also outed, the one which concealed her movements and endanged countless field agents when revealed?
What's that, you didn't even know that happened? It was "Brewster Jennings", and you should be ashamed.......
Mikester, Phoenix, AZ
- 1
- 2
Next