Win tickets to the ultimate village fete with welly wanging and more

If film-makers have an urge to make new versions of films, it is the flops they should remake, not the successful ones, Sir Michael Caine told The Times yesterday.
With classic films such as Humphrey Bogart’s Casablanca and Henry Fonda’s Twelve Angry Men now being remade, the Oscar-winning star of more than 90 films said: “If you remake a good film, you’re on a hiding to nothing.”
Caine, who appeared in the 1972 classic Sleuth, is in Venice for the world premiere of a film of the same name at the Film Festival this week. He was talking after witnessing film-makers’ misguided attempts to remake some of his own films, including Alfie and Get Carter, classics of British cinema.
It takes a brave or foolhardy actor to follow in the footsteps of one who won Oscars for Hannah and Her Sisters and The Cider House Rules – with further acclaim for The Ipcress File, Educating Rita and The Quiet American.
While Jude Law irritated audiences with his smug Alfie, which paled in comparison with Caine’s depiction of a cheeky charmer, critics failed to comprehend what made Sylvester Stallone think he could compete with Caine’s portrayal of the London gangster Jack Carter.
Both films flopped at the box office. Reworking a successful formula rarely has the same sparkle, Caine believes.
While the 2004 Alfie was named as one of the worst remakes in an online poll, Caine acknowledged yesterday that it failed because the 1966 original – which made him an international star – was “a film of its time”. Get Carter has been described as one of the greatest British films, but the 2000 version was condemned by critics and the public voted it the worst remake of all time.
Film-makers did, however, get it right with another Caine classic, The Italian Job, partly because the new version, starring Mark Wahlberg, bore little resemblance to the 1969 original.
That, it seems, is the secret: only make a remake that is not a remake. Caine has done just that with Sleuth. “It is 99 per cent not a remake”, he said. “The name of the play is where the resemblance ends. It’s only inspired by the earlier film.”
The original Sleuth, a 1970 Tony award-winning psychological drama, was scripted by Anthony Shaffer and co-starred Laurence Olivier as the bitter writer who takes revenge, through a deadly, twisted game of wits, on a hairdresser and part-time actor who has run off with his wife.
This time Caine is the older man, and Jude Law is the younger man. The new script is by Harold Pinter, the Nobel laureate, who has completely rewritten the screenplay.
The original Sleuth, directed in 1972 by Joseph L. Mankiewicz, earned Oscar nominations for Caine and Olivier. This time the director is Kenneth Branagh, who paid tribute to Shaffer’s “wonderful job” but confirmed that the film’s mood, visual effect and characterisation were completely different, with “Pinter’s darker, more blackly comic sensibility”. Caine’s latest performance was inspired by reading about an irrational and psychopathic condition called morbid jealousy. He said: “Larry [Olivier] was great fun, very theatrical. He played it as a dangerous eccentric. I play it as a psychopathic murderer, more realistic and quite a bit scarier.”
He added: “The original was based on a rather archaic snobbery. This is still snobbery, but intellectual, someone who proves he’s superior.”
The set establishes the differing moods, he said: “In the first Sleuth, my character lived in a lovely old English country house, all chintz and flowers. Here you go inside and it’s steel, glass, marble and concrete, very minimalist. Immediately you’re in Pinter country.”
Two years ago Pinter won the Nobel Prize for Literature. His classics from the 1960s included The Caretaker and The Servant. Sleuth brings together Caine and Pinter, who has a cameo role, 50 years after they went to the same school, Hackney Downs Grammar. The film will be released in Britain on November 23.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers



2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
F/1989
£36,000
Hollingworth At Ombersley
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
90K plus bonus plus options
Confidential
London
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
£40,000 - £50,000 + benefits
Lloyds Pharmacy
Coventry
£38k
Barclaycard
Various Locations
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I think people are missing the point here. The main reason remakes, sequels, re-iamginings â whatever- are made is purely financial. Like any product, if the film has made money, it will be continue to be regurgitated until it stops making money.
Are you sure Sir Michael didnât have a small glint in his eye when he said this? After all, this is the man who appeared in âJaws 4â and âBeyond the Poseidon Adventureâ to pay âfor the front porch and the kidsâ school feesâ. Any notions of artistic creativity come a very, very distant second.
Bobnessuk, London, England
Interesting remark about a film being "of its time".
I'm more of a theatre animal than a film animal, so instinctively I'm not going to object to remakes. And actually, it doesn't seem like Caine does either. It seems like what he's saying is that any film, remake or not, needs a spark of true creativity to be a success -- and that you're much more likely to find that spark if you can tap into the spirit of the age.
Question. Are there any classic films that are just timeless?
Another question. You can totally reinvent a Shakespeare play without touching the script, as long as you find your own unique connection to the play's deepest truths. Has anyone done that with a film? Stuck close to the original script, and delivered a remake brimming with creativity and originality?
On the subject of which, I would cite a quote from the fantasy remake of "Gone With the Wind" starring Samuel L Jackson as Rhett Butler, but this is the Times and not the Guardian, so I won't.
Rob, London,
Stallone's "Get Carter" wasn't that bad.
Even if it was it didn't stop Caine pocketing his fee for appearing in it!
Big Man, Lahndon, UK
Can someone give Hollywood a lecture on when enough is enough wiuth sequels? What on earth made anyone think Terminator 3 was a worthy follow up to the 2nd for example?
Luke Nicolaides, London, UK
'Film-makers DID get it right.. The Italian Job?' What film were YOU watching? The original was a light-hearted romp with noted comedians populating its every scene - not the dark, smarmy attempt by 'Marki-Mark' (who should stick to underwear ads). The ONLY scenes in-which any real risk occurred in the chase were when Wahlberg drove the BMW (not a true Mini) past the copter and in-front of the LA subway train. The original's "Europe's greatest living stunt driver" put those Minis through risky scenes from start to finish. Anyone could drive a car down a straight staircase, up a ramp and into a car-carrier train but it takes a true stunt driver to leap one between buildings and up into a moving bus. Once again the new Hollyweird came-up short on results - attempting to copy the success of original blockbusters and cult classics rather than originate those it its own. What's next - a multi-million $ propaganda piece of "Why we fight" to promote Bush's middleast debacle?
Larry, Middletown, USA/NY