Kevin Maher
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition

After a long and lonely 18 months in the cinematic wilderness, the movie messiah has returned. Lions for Lambs, his first outing since Mission: Impossible III in summer last year delivers that familiar brand of intense stares, dazzling smiles, piercingly precise delivery and cocksure demeanour to let us know one thing above all else – Tom Cruise is back.
At The Times BFI London Film Festival last month, where the film received its world premiere, Cruise did his customary walkabout, 100 megawatt smile on full beam for the cameraphone-wielding crowds. He knows how to work them, even when sporting a dodgy new hairdo for a new Nazi-themed movie.
But what standing does Cruise have now? Is he still the box-office behemoth? Is he the 45-year-old A-list actor with artistic pretensions and a driving need to push and poke his own persona? Or is he the pilloried media wacko, bouncing back from the ignominy of Oprah’s couch and into the serious spotlight as an industry mogul and power-house boss of his newly purchased United Artists studio? Or all, or none, of the above?
A hint of an answer can be gleaned, perhaps, from Cruise’s turn in Lions for Lambs, in which he plays a high-ranking Republican senator with presidential ambitions. It’s a solid, statesmanlike role in a film that seeks to interrogate – very wordily and worthily – current issues around war and conflict.
Lions is all the more interesting because Cruise not only plays a lead role but is also the movie’s executive producer. Even more significantly, the film is the debut project from Cruise’s revamped United Artists – and thus something of a reassuring statement to Cruise-watchers, especially to those within the industry.
Early reviews have not been positive. Variety said there was “no real human drama to buttress the moral-political conflict”, and that the “star-heavy discourse uses a lot of words to say nothing new”. James Christopher in this paper wrote that “not a single character feels real and rounded”.
Cruise and his production partner, Paula Wagner, famously secured $500 million of investor equity last summer to procure United Artists, and so Lions for Lambs will be seen as something of a cheerleader for the new company, and the newly emerged Cruise brand – UA’s next movie will be Bryan Singer’s Second World War thriller Valkyrie, with Cruise playing the would-be assassin of Adolf Hitler, Claus von Stauffenberg.
There is a lot of attention on Lions for Lambs right now, agrees Steven Gaydos, the executive editor of Variety. “If the movie doesn’t make its money back, or doesn’t generate awards-season traction, then it won’t be an auspicious beginning for UA,” he says. Yet, he insists, Cruise himself, as a brand, as an actor and as a profit-making machine, is bigger than UA. “Classic Hollywood stars such as John Wayne and Clark Gable spent 30 years as leading men,” he explains. “Tom Cruise is at Year 24, and still only 45 years old. He’s still able to ride the motorcycle and crash through the window. UA is just a diversification.”
“He already facilitates the visions of other film-makers by staging readings, offering advice and helping others to get their movies made,” says Cameron Crowe, a close friend, who directed Cruise in Jerry Maguire and Vanilla Sky. “Now he does it officially with UA. It just seems like a natural step.”
Crowe says that the key to Cruise is not in his mogul-like ambitions but his indomitable work ethic. And to understand this you have to go back to the dank and unforgiving crucible of childhood. “I think Tom approached the movie business as a guy who had no famous relatives, no friends in high places, and he was going to get there by tenacity and desire,” Crowe explains. “He watched his mother support a large family as a single parent with little help. He saw the success story of her survival in his own home and it imprinted on him mightily.”
The only boy among four siblings, he suffered at the hands of an abusive, bullying father, was bounced in and out of 15 high schools across the country (he was also dyslexic) and, after his parents divorced, went to live in relative penury with his mother and sisters. The family was so poor, according to Cruise’s biographer Iain Johnstone, that for one Christmas they gave each other, as presents, self-composed poems and even the promise to execute a future household chore. Cruise’s father later died, alone, from cancer at 49.
Though it’s easy to see this material deprivation as a driving force behind the Cruise star machine, it’s also hard not to spot the emotional disjuncture that’s slyly inherent in his otherwise pristine screen persona. His best movie roles, for instance, have been characters that are often emotionally empty, or at least wounded within.
In Magnolia, his motivational guru Frank T. J. Mackey is a wondrous study in paper-thin arrogance. The role, written for Cruise by the perceptive director Paul Thomas Anderson, seemed to pick apart Cruise’s iconic status and then finally present him, at his most vulnerable and exposed, with a dying father to confront (played by Jason Robards). It was to Cruise’s credit that he took the role in the first place, let alone embraced it with such gusto (his performance in the deathbed scene, all silent screams and slowly emerging rage, is one of the great screen turns of our time).
Similarly, films such as Vanilla Sky, Eyes Wide Shutand A Few Good Men all deal with Cruise types who suspect that they may be hollow men after all. Even his famous and ostensibly fatuous blockbuster roles are constructed around characters with primal family scars – in Top Gunhe is haunted by the memory of a dead father; in Rain Mainhis cavalier attitude to his older brother, Dustin Hoffman, hides an oedipal hatred of his father; while in War of the Worlds he is shown to be initially ill-equipped for the trials of fatherhood itself.
It’s this almost intangible sense of potential agony beneath the ostensible ecstasy that makes Tom Cruise such a draw. He is the embodiment of a certain kind of flawless screen hero, and at exactly the same time, seeks to subvert that. “Tom has never been afraid of the dark stuff,” Crowe says.
After his childhood, anything would have been a cakewalk for Cruise. Driven relentlessly by his hard-knocks work ethic, he took some nighttime Stanislavskian acting classes in New York, nabbed a bit part in Taps, a leading role in Risky Business, and then became a box-office magnet in 1986 with Top Gun. He has since been married three times (to Mimi Rogers, Nicole Kidman and, most recently, to Katie Holmes), been vilified in the press for his belief in Scientology, and been dropped, last year, by his former studio Paramount over alleged concerns about his “erratic behaviour” during his much publicised courtship of Holmes.
Yet somehow he rides, with seeming ease, the rough waves of negative media attention. “The real trick is to stay interesting,” Crowe explains. “And Tom Cruise stays interesting by being honest and passionate. The guy on the screen is a magnified projection of exactly who he is.”
So which Tom Cruise has reemerged onto our screens? “Getting out there with Meryl Streep and Robert Redford in Lions for Lambs was a good move,” Gaydos says. “ Valkyrie looks interesting too. I think people are focused on the Tom Cruise they remember – the guy who worked his butt off for every movie he made, who promoted the pictures tirelessly, who put himself at risk and tried new things and new genres, and really had a lot of determination and smarts. Well, that guy is back.”
Lions for Lambs is on general release from Friday November 9, 2007

Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I love Tom Cruise, he's my man any time. But he's not a great actor, please he's not and we all know this. He's sexy, good-looking and charming, but he's not a great actor. Even the Academy made it obvious when talented actors like Cuba Gooding and Jamie Foxx has won awards supporting Tom Cruise in films...Tom Cruise is a very good entertainer and he's very charismatic but he's not great and can not be compared to the likes of "GREAT" Denzel Washington, Tom Hanks, Russell Crowe, Dustin Huffman, Al Paccino, Robert Deniro, Mel Gibson, Will Smith...So I'd rate Tom Cruise as an average actor.
...afterall Tom Cruise is an average actor, I don't even know what to call Brad Pitt.
Tom, Seattle, US
..."anyone who is against tom cruise or scientology or l ron hubbard is obviously on drugs or more likely even a criminal"...
Really? Is that a balanced and rational argument?
You're not helping your case now are you?
Chris, Newcastle, UK
Tom cruise criticised psychotropic drugs which the U.S corporate machine pushes and coincidently the perpetrators of the amish killings, the columbine and the virginia tech masssacres earlier this year were all taking these mind bending drugs. Tom cruise also Helped out the 9/11 heroes. The very people who bush promised to help in the immediate aftermath of the terror attacks but as we know he turned his back on them completely. So i can understand why the corporate owned american media wants to hurt tom cruise.
simon lomax, warringtonq, uk
I love Tom"s films.He has a Dazzling energetic persona with just enough quirks to make him interesting without being over the top.He is a dynamic actor and I feel a sense of nobility enamating from within him.So what if he twisted Oprah's fingers,she makes more than he does.I will still continue to be spellbound by his screen presence.All you haters who diss a guy when he is down,have no loyalty .Scary movie 3 was only a little bit funny,mostly because it pays homage to one of his poorer outings.Give the guy a break ,he's human,like us.from earth,origionally.
Joseph Melia, Monasterevin, Ireland
Tom Cruise is a boring fart, has no idead how to act or engage a thinking persons imagination and as far as I am concerned signifies all that is wrong with the movie industry today.
Janet Golds, Frinton-on-Sea, UK
I agree 100% with Daniel in the UK. Tom is an amazing actor and it's none of our business about his personal life. I was wanting to see a picture of Suri before they emerged, only because Tom and Katie are such handsome people - and I knew the offspring would be a cutie and she is! Tom doesn't look 45 and probably never will. If there was anything that didn't work in War of the Worlds it was making Tom look older - nice try, no banana! You go Tom!
Elaine, Kirkwood, MO USA
Elaine Willingham, Kirkwood, MO USA
Cruise is an incredibly gifted screen actor. Whether you disagree with his religious beliefs, or simply don't like some of the films he has worked on shouldn't detract from this fact.
In today's flash-in-the-pan celebrity-obssessed media culture, he is one of the few genuine talents around.
Daniel, Epsom, UK
Claudia Trent, because this is an article about Tom Cruise!
Sally, london,
"Jerry of Seattle is mistaken...Costner remains the world's worst living actor. Tom Cruise is not an actor."
And Mark Farber is not even human
Chancery Stone, Aberdeen, UK
If you don't like Lions for Lambs you obviously don't get it. It is a thought provoking film and was over too quickly
Nigel, London,
I'm constantly surprised that people cannot look beyond someone's religion to see whether they are good at their job! If your pilot on a flight was a scientologist - would you still get on? Why put a movie or person down because of one of the actors beliefs!?
I've seen the film and thought that all the actors did great jobs. Which is why I go to the movies..
Abbie, UK ,
Jerry of Seattle is mistaken...Costner remains the world's worst living actor. Tom Cruise is not an actor.
Mark Farber, Washington, DC
Tom Cruise you are forever a great movie icon. Your megawatt smile is unmatched by anyone. You are a keeper!!!
But,,,,,......you would do well to just be an actor and (great one at that) leave the pontificating, the politics, the religion and such out of films in which you star. ( Don't become another Tom Hanks! a great actor /comedian too who has become unpopular recently with his take on spirituality type films)
You don't need to have a soapbox because it will do you in. You are an actor.....actor...actor...not a political persona.....religious nut, etc.
Your fans Love you,
ps, but no no I did not and will not see the lions for lambs film.
Lucy Patterson, Spring branch, Texas
["Tom Cruise has the looks and charisma to be an iconic movie star. It is unfortunate however that he uses his celebrity to mouth off about something he obviously knows nothing about...that being mental illness and the medications required to treat these horrific diseases."]
A lot of celebrities and a lot of people in general are guilty of this. Why single out Tom Cruise for condemnation?
Claudia Trent, Los Angeles, CA
Tom,
Just had to say I thought you were great in Planet of the Apes.
Thx for the memories.
Nod, Nuneaton, UK
Give me Tom Cruise any day! He's my man!
Foster, Gahanna, Ohio
Tom Cruise has done some wicked films. The likes of Magnolia and Vanilla Sky are some of the best films I have seen. My children love the Mission Impossible films. He is a dedicated actor and a thorough professional. He spends hours with his fans, signing autographs and chatting. His is a very hands on person.
His religious beliefs are are just that.. his beliefs!
As for the Oprah incident, so what if he jumped about, declaring his love for Katie Holmes. That kind of romance has been sorely missed in this miserable society. It made a fewepeople uncomfortable seeing a man behave in such away, I think that says more about them than him.
Long live Tom Cruise... a true Hollywood star!! ***
Kelly, London, uk
Meryl Streep, Robert Redford and Tom Cruise are all there together in 'Lions and Lambs' which is an interesting film about international conflicts and personal dilemmas at a certain time in history. It may put a number of viewers on the spot and force them to dislike it out of cynicism and their own apathy, or rather take to its seriousness and representation of all too believable situations. Come down on whichever side you wish. I found it refreshing, and I didn't go along obsessed by Tom Cruise.
Peter, NW London, UK
I just saw LIONS FOR LAMBS. I thought it was a hell of a lot better than I had assumed. And Tom Cruise was great.
<i> He should learn to keep his ridiculous Scientology beliefs to himself.</i>
Thankfully, I'm not like many who have allowed their religious bigotry to get in the way of seeing a pretty damn good movie. Nor am I one of those who believe that celebrities are not allowed to express their own beliefs whether it be political, religious or otherwise.
Rosie Powell, Los Angeles, CA
I do everything I can to avoid films with Tom Cruise and the like. All they are interested in is making money and playing the same character over and over again. There are much better small films with less well known actors out there which I would rather watch. Stop pandering to the egos of these people and spend the money on a wider range of films and actors, they will be watched!
Fiona, London,
I am utterly ecstatic that the movie has tanked. By not paying hard earned money to see this movie, people have finally taken a stance against Tom and his cult. I think that it speaks volumes when people will not see your movie-especially since they know that whatever money is earned, will go straight to the cult. However, I am sitting here wondering why Robert Redford would even cast him in his movie??? Bad move Robert. How long is it going to take for all of Hollywood to get the memo? You know the one: if you want your movie to tank at the box office, cast Tom-the cult control freak couch jumping crazy-Cruise.
Anna, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Like him or not, Scientology aside, any honest reading of his acting (and his personal life as it appears in the press) reveals Tom playing one role: Tom acting. He plays this role to perfection. But there is no one behind, no character - no one sharing the spectator's questions about the human condition. He is to acting what "pop" is to music - harmless, fun, frothy, vacuous, derivative, superficial - and I, for one, consistently unimpressed, do not pay money for facsimile.
Cheryl, St. Maur -des-Fossés, France
Pegues, St. Maur des Fosses, France
Tom Cruise has the looks and charisma to be an iconic movie star. It is unfortunate however that he uses his celebrity to mouth off about something he obviously knows nothing about...that being mental illness and the medications required to treat these horrific diseases. He should learn to keep his ridiculous Scientology beliefs to himself. Being a celebrity does not give him licence to denounce what he apparently has been lucky enough in life to know nothing about. What's next for this silly man?...criticizing diabetics for using Insulin??...I don't particularly wish him well.
Carol, Peterborough, Ontario,Canada
By the way, anyone stupid enough to fork over their money to a cult and buy into the rubbish Scientology sells them deserves everything they get.
Germaine, Brooklyn,
Tom Cruise is one of those paradoxes in life. His acting ability varies from one extreme to the other; breathtaking in films such as Magnolia and, arguably, War of the Worlds to abysmal in films such as Eyes Wide Shut and Top Gun.
Love him or hate him he is a one man money making machine. United Artits will always make money with him at the helm because presumably his company will be securing the rights to the blockbuster fare that he serves up every summer.
United Artists presents MI4?
Muffy White, Banbury,
There will always be people who dislike Tom.I will always be a loyal fan.Thank you.
psc, amsterdam, the netherlands
...and jerry of seattle has no life of his own. Amen.
Ratif, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
The man's a star. Personally I'll tend to steer clear of the films where he's a guy you're meant to like, or even worse redeems himself (The Last Samurai? Jerry Maguire? - no thanks).
But when you're mean to feel seriously conflicted about him, he soars. I give you Magnolia, Eyes Wide Shut, Collateral, The Color of Money... These are great movies, people, and any actor - whether they profess to be 'serious' or 'populist' - should be proud of them.
I'll also take The Firm, A Few Good Men, and the first and third Mission: Impossible. He runs, he cries, he runs, he cries...
Jamie, London,
What's with all these negative comments!? Can you people be that stupid and miserable! Even if Lions for Lambs doesn't do that well, He will still bounce back. HE ALWAYS BOUNCES BACK! Do you folls not remember that only 2 years ago he had the biggest Box Office hit in his career with War of the Worlds, And Last summer, Mission Impossible 3 made $400 million and was Paramounts highest grossing film.
PUH-LEEZE! Whenever there's something positive to be said about Cruise, the haters all come out and try to find ways to destroy it! TOM IS BACK! Although he never left in the 1st place.
J.s., Chicago, IL
Sorry, but Cruise is so over. I never thought much of him as an actor, and now I question him just as a person - considering the strange way in which he procured a wife and child, and the whole Scientology "business." I don't buy it, and I don't buy him. He ruins the movies he's in.
Jamie, Las Vegas, NV
Tom Cruise "is back." What a bunch of crap! LIONS FOR LAMBS is a disaster. This is no way to kick off the new United Artists. I'm sure Summer Redstone must be thrilled that the film is not a part of the Paramount lineup
Steve Durbin, Camira, QLD, Australia
some actors are better seen and not heard. id make an exception with tc and have him not seen either.
dave, LA, CA
I don't buy the hype or the movie. Boycott UA, Tom cruise and scientology. I won't support the scientology cult crime syndicate by going to see the movie. No mind control I support free thinking.
Frank Mcgillicuddy, Freedomville, NO mind control
i didn't know the london times did plugs. (let alone such despicable and desperate ones as these). shame.
Jack Johnson, windsor, Connecticut
Tom, keep doing what you're doing...because nobody has done it better. Your body of work speaks for itself. We live in a world filled with people who jump on bandwagons. If the media says a person is a "freak", most of the population believes it w/o question. I look forward to seeing you prove them all wrong. To me, there's one sure thing in Hollywood... and that's a Tom Cruise movie!
Tony, Los Angeles,
For all the hype Cruise has enjoyed over the years he really isn't much of an actor. He's always the same guy just wearing a different outfit. Add to that his Scientology affiliation and he's become a total turn-off to me and all of my friends. I won't pay money to see his movies. If they come on free TV I might watch but that's it. He doesn't need my money and I don't need to support scientology by seeing his films.
nmm, New York, NY/USA
Although his Scientology-inspired rants are a turn-off, they're not the first reason I stopped watching his movies. He plays the same vacuous, arrogant version of himself in every role. I haven't paid to see a TC movie since Interview with the Vampire, and even that *despite* is presence - not because of it. His strength is in surrounding himself with talent - I'll give him that. But he's not a talented actor by any stretch of the imagination.
Germaine, Brooklyn,
Tom's the ma, he's been the most consistent of the big stars in project choice and mixes the commercial and the art very skillfully. Now he has a studio, expect him to be around a whole lot longer.
smike, London, UK
Yo Cruise my man
You are doing it finer better faster slicker cooler then the very best of the rest...
Shazid, Redhill Surrey, United Kingdom
The most interesting thing about TC is his moral integrity. In a world such as this that quality is more precious than diamonds and more valuable than gold.
He sets a good example of an artist who is neither quirky nor diva-ish but one of those 'what you see is what you get' kind of people and, God Bless him, that's alright by me.
songbird, Los Angeles, USA / CA
Tom Cruise is a living Hollywood GOD!!!!!!!
He is the greatest actor in this planet
Nobody can achieve what he has achieved. People should worship this guy for waht he has become as an actor, producer. My dream is to meet this person and give him a big hug. I love him more than anyone else in this world.
Arif, Dhaka, Bangladesh
I feel Mr. Cruise has been much maligned because of his association with Scientology, not his acting ability. He is a good actor, not a great one maybe, but certainly brings an air of credibility to the more serious characters he has played. Even in a role that took second place to those marvellous 'tripods' that strode their way through WAR OF THE WORLDS, he gave it his all and delivered a surprisingly sympathetic working-class hero (a link to his own past perhaps?). Certainly, I haven't liked all of his films but those I did were well worth the admission price.
Colin Cumner, Adelaide, South Australia.
I'm not a scientologist but I agree with the scientologists Joxe Arkaitz,Terryeo,grnapl,Gina, anyone who is
against tom cruise or scientology or l ron hubbard is obviously on drugs or more likely even a criminal.
bob dobbs, rochester, ny
Agree with Jerry, Seattle. Tom Cruise is a terrible actor who can only turn in a decent performance with a director who knows how to break through his facade.
Carolyn, Oxford,
I don't know what he has to do to get respect out of this town! You name one other actor that could have held the scene like Tom did in A Few Good Men up against Nickelson. Just give him his due for all that he has done,and will due in the future and leave him alone. The man is one of the best if not the best! Way to go Tom!!!!!
Pamela walklin, Reno, Nevada
Tom Cruise never left. He is a great actor and a greater being. He has always been honest and passionate. He works hard and he cares for and helps people around him. A great man! And we will still see many many good movies with Tom Cruise!
Joxe Arkaitz, LA, California
Not that it matters in this film, but mostly Cruise does his own stunts, mostly. And not many are willing to do that.
Terryeo, San Francisco, USA
I agree with "grnapl, boulder, co" and I love how you put the media's real motives. So, I'm going to duplicate what was written "Actually from where I sit that guy never left. The only ones who said he was wacko were the ones invested in no person left un-drugged (the media)."
Gina, Santa Monica, CA
Actually from where I sit that guy never left. The only ones who said he was wacko were the ones invested in no person left un-drugged (the media).
grnapl, boulder, co
Except for the preposterous Kevin Costner, Tom Cruise is the world's worst living actor.
Jerry, seattle , usa