Ben Hoyle, Arts Reporter
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
Hollywood has the moral compass of the Taleban or al-Qaeda, according to one of Britain’s best known film actors.
Rupert Everett, who made his name in Another Country before starring opposite Julia Roberts in the hit comedy My Best Friend’s Wedding, cited the major studios’ attitude to women, gays, abortion and addiction to support his claim.
“Hollywood is a place that pretends it’s very liberal but it’s not remotely,” he told The Times. “It’s like Al-Qaeda.”
Everett, who is gay, believes that his sexuality has cost him “tons” of leading roles during his career. In his acclaimed and frequently outspoken autobiography Red Carpets and Other Banana Skins, he claims that the head of MGM once vetoed his casting as the male lead opposite Sharon Stone in a film saying “to all intents and purposes a homosexual was a pervert in the eyes of America and the world would never accept me in the role and therefore MGM would never hire me.”
His recent voicework as Prince Charming in the Shrek films is “a role I would never get in a live-action film”. He does take the lead in his new film St Trinian’s, which arrives in cinemas later this week, but he is in drag as Camilla Fritton, the irresponsible headmistress of the anarchic girls’ boarding school
Earlier this month Jodie Foster joined Everett as one of the industry’s very few out gay stars when she publicly thanked her “beautiful” partner Cydney Bernard at an awards breakfast in Los Angeles.
However, her decision should not be seen as evidence that the climate for gay actors is becoming any easier, Everett said. “It’s the opposite. She is 45 and she just couldn’t be bothered any more.
“After a certain age you can be gay (in Hollywood). Before that it’s not only not good. It’s impossible.”
Making films in America is “like being in Afghanistan” in other respects too he added. Everett has been a friend and confidante to some of the most powerful women in the entertainment industry, including Madonna, Roberts and Sharon Stone.
However, despite the rise of actresses earning $20 million a film, such as Reese Witherspoon, Angelina Jolie and Cameron Diaz, he believes that Hollywood is still much easier to negotiate if your are a straight, male actor.
“The treatment of women there is quite extraordinary. If you compare being a 70 year old woman to a 70 year old man, the old woman will maybe get to play a grandmother. The old man will do a film with a 20 year old girl (opposite him).
“On abortion, (the studios) are for it in private because they don’t want actresses to clog up their schedules (by taking time off to have babies). But in films, if you get pregnant you have to keep the baby and end up with the man.
Abortion has barely registered in American films since the 1980s, when it tended to happen to minor characters, in backstreet clinics and end in agony or death.
Three of the most well-reviewed American films of 2007 deal with unplanned pregnancies. But where one in five American pregnancies ends in abortion, the characters in Knocked Up, Waitress and Juno all decide to carry theirs to full term.
It is different in Europe where Mike Leigh’s Vera Drake and this year’s Cannes Palme d’Or winner from Romania Four Months, Three Weeks, Two Days are two recent prominent films to address the topic.
Everett is equally concerned by the double standards in the entertainment industry’s treatment of addiction.
“A 50 year old male drug addict will be supported. Everyone feels enormous compassion for them. Without naming names, female alcoholics and drug addicts are absolutely rejected. It’s not accepted.
“No one suggests that Robert Downey Jr (who went to prison twice while battling drink and drug problems) was really that crazy whereas Britney Spears is almost witch hunted.”
The industry’s hypocrisy and moral conservatism is rooted in the studios’ aversion to anything that might risk damaging the bottom line, Everett said.
St Trinian’s was an exception to the rule because of its relatively small budget and because Barnaby Thompson, who produced and directed it with Oliver Parker, is also the head of Ealing Studios, the venerable institution behind it. “The studio was Barnaby more or less,” Everett said. “It wasn’t made by a board of executives.”
“Most films nowadays are made by 20-30 executives who attack the writing and change everything. You can do much less in a film now than you could in the 1970s because the stakes are so high.”

Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I'm fed up with this talentless diva.
Last week he claimed Al Pacino had become a parody of himself. At least he's been in good films. He's one Oscars. He still turns out good performances.
Hollywood doesn't hate gays and women. Hollywood hates Rupert Everett. Why? Because Hollywood can't name a single film he's appeared in.
If he was a good actor he'd get roles. Strangley most films are based in fiction. Even stranger there are fictional gays. There are roles for everyone with the talent.
Put simply, Mr Everett doesn't get denied roles because of his sexuality but because of his lack of talent.
I expect he truly beleives the likes of Ian McKellan, David Hyde Pierce and Dirk Bogarde all suffered terribly, like those poor abused actresses like Julia Roberts and Halle Berry.
However, I think this rant is more to do with the fact he has a new film out, which, incidentally sees him play a woman (less well than the straight John Travolta) in a film which is AWFUL!
David James, London, England
what a dingbat! this man has no discernable talent. last week he was whingeing and claiming al pacino was a parody of himself. at least I can name al pacino films. at least I've seen al pacino films!
rupert everett is not denied roles because he is gay, he is denied roles because he is a difficult diva with too little talent to be put on screen.
comparing hollywood to the taleban is frankly ridiculous and over exagerrated. I expect Rupert really does feel this, but I expect this rant is more to do with stirring up publicity for his latest film, which, by the way, is appalling.
David James, London, England
i,m a bit lost here in this comment what is british cancer ? i thought cancer was a worldwide thing .in america could you please define {british cancer}
john, nelson, lanc,s
Maybe all the hyper-liberalism that comes out of Hollywood is just greedy, unethical people trying to assuage their consciences. Also explains why they don't care for religion much ... moral codes and ethics and such.
V the K, Frederick, MD
I can't tell you how badly I feel that some women in hollywood only make 20 million dollars a movie. I mean, how can they be expected to live on such a paltry sum of money?!
(/sarcasm)
Seriously though, these are his opinions. If what he's saying about being denied roles for his sexuality is true then it's quite troubling and sad. But it certainly seems like he has an axe to grind here about the slights he feels he dealt with.
To read this account and claim it as 'proof' of a position either way however is asinine.
I'm looking right at you Tina in Greenbelt, MD
Tigger, San Diego, California
Less British cancer in my country? Anytime!
Christopher Davis, Forest Hills, New York
How pathetic that he can even conjure up such an obscene moral equivalence. Has he no shame? Is he really that narcissistic that he equates being turned down for a role with: unimaginably horrific torture, beheading, murder, rape, suicide bombing, whipping, sawing off limbs, etc.?
Good Lord man get some perspective. And oh by the way, maybe your acting skills aren't as great as you think they are.
Dale J, Irvine, CA, USA
Let's be real here -- Hollywood exists to make money, and if they don't think they can sell tickets to movies featuring an openly gay man acting like a straight man in a romantic lead role -- which would make the whole movie sort of not-very-credible -- why would they do it? Would anyone go see Sean Hayes seducing a woman? As a parody maybe, not as a serious movie.
And most Americans don't support 100% abortion-on-demand, so we're not likely to watch that sort of movie either. Read the comments and you'll see that the people who make the movies are "for it" in private -- the same can't GENERALLY be said about the populace of this country.
This isn't evidence that liberals don't control Hollywood -- it's evidence that Hollywood doesn't fully control people's values, and Hollywood has to keep from clashing with people's values too openly in order to make money.. So these people are liberals -- we all knew that -- but their product is subject to market forces. C'est la vie.
Matthew, Cincinnati, OH
There's nothing new in Everett's comments. He's just had a burst of indignation. High profile actors have been known for hiding their homosexuality since the dawn of the entertainment industry. And history proves that the ones who revealed it too soon "lost their jobs".
Daniel Zucchi, London, UK
I wouldn't compare an actor like Robert Downey Jr. to Britney Spears. Perhaps people feel more compassion for him because they admire his talent.
Bob Latham, New York, ny., USA
Sometimes what's right isn't as important as what's profitable.
Max Power, Reno, USA
Another proof that the conservative claim that liberals are in charge of the culture is a load of propaganda.
Tina Rhea, Greenbelt, Maryland US
I think it is appalling that an actor of rupert everett's talent is being denied roles because of his sexuality.his book was brilliant ,lets hope that the powers that be have a major rethink.
EDWARD SYNGE, TISBURY, uk