Ben Hoyle, Arts Correspondent
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
The hitherto lawless world of online entertainment has began to adopt the same ratings system that governs British cinemas. The British Board of Film Classification said yesterday that its online ratings scheme, BBFC Online, which features the familiar U, PG, 12A, 15 and 18 certificates, would give parents unprecedented information about what their children were watching via the internet. Online stores and services that sign up to the voluntary scheme will be required to rate downloaded and streamed films, video games and television programmes.
David Cooke, the board’s director, said that members would also be required to block children from accessing inappropriate content.
He gave a warning to parents and providers that the vacuum in online classification would probably be filled by US censors, who were taking a more relaxed attitude to scenes of violence and horror in entertainment.
In 2007, several blockbusters rated 15 in Britain were awarded a PG13 certificate by the Motion Picture Association of America, allowing children aged 13 and over in the US to watch them unaccompanied by parents. The films included Cloverfield, Disturbia and I Am Legend.
“Different, but equally significant, points of divergence can be identified between the standards applied by the various European classification bodies,” Mr Cooke said. “For example, French and British attitudes to children being exposed to graphic sexual representations are poles apart.” He said that the discrepancies underlined the need for a British ratings system to cover online entertainment.
A report commissioned by the BBFC, and carried out by the market research company TNS, suggests that 63 per cent of adults (74 per cent of parents) are worried about downloadable videos that do not come with independent advice and labelling, while 84 per cent (91 per cent of parents) want to see BBFC ratings extended to all online content.
Until the launch of BBFC Online, there was little independent classification of online entertainment. Mr Cooke said: “We are world leaders in this, for sure. There is nobody else doing this. No other media regulator is this far down the road to providing a scheme that allows people to make informed choices about downloadable content in the knowledge that the members providing the films and games are being properly monitored.”
Developed over 18 months, the BBFC Online is a response to demands for consistency from both the public and the film industry.
Three Hollywood studios, Walt Disney Studios, Warner Bros and 20th Century Fox, have already joined t h e scheme, and the BBFC expects that most distributors and vendors will follow suit.
Mr Cooke said he expected that a tiny minority of producers, who create films featuring extreme, often sexual violence, would eschew the scheme.
Classified films, programmes and games will carry a white version of the BBFC’s instantly recognisable “black card”, containing the appropriate category symbol and consumer advice specific to them.
The precise “gatekeeping” mechanism used to stop underage viewers from watching unsuitable content will be left to individual organisations. Existing examples include services such as NetIDMe, where parents can register their child’s details with an independent third party, and PIN-controlled accounts for children.
Margaret Hodge, the Culture Minister, said that the scheme would help parents “gain greater confidence that their purchases are appropriate before they commit themselves”.
Peter Johnson, head of policy at the BBFC, said: “If we don’t get people to sign up to the BBFC system, then it will default to the MPAA ratings, which don’t keep kids out of violent films and which don’t reflect UK public opinion.”
How Britain rates
The Simpsons Rated PG in Britain. but a PG13 in the US because of “irreverent humour throughout”
This is England Rated 18 in Britain because of racist violence and language. Rated suitable for all in France, with a warning Inside
Deep Throat 18 in Britain for sexual content. Rated suitable for children aged 12 and over in France
Brokeback Mountain 15 in Britain. Rated suitable for all in France, but only for those aged 17 and over in the US
Cloverfield 15 in Britain because of threats and horror, but PG13 in the US

Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Hobbit: where fools rush in.
Doesn't (as in does not) not "does'nt".
Dave Foulkes, Dorking, UK
Well it's just typical, rather than place any responsibility on parents to keep an eye on their children they just throw money at the problem. How dare they assume they can judge what deems appropriate for people to see.
Marina Kyriacou, Larnaca, Cyprus
Who can say if the USA, France or UK is right?
Let individuals decide and allow parents to have responsibility for their children.
The UK has high levels of control but some of the worst behaved kids and high crime levels.....
Martin Saunders, Ipswich, UK
Well that's great John perhaps if you read more and watched less films you might know how to spell!
I think at the end of the day it does'nt really matter what certificate they put on a film because there is no way they can enforce it.
Money for old rope.
Hobbit, Hastings, England
This exercise will only apply to "traditional" films and TV-shows which in one way or another are also available via the internet and are generally "tame" in comparison to stuff available via Youtube or indeed freely accessible porn-sites. It is a rather pointless exercise and a waste of money.
Adrian, London , UK
Leave us alone..,.the internet should not be governed by these Gate Keepers!! its just another step towards total control.
Waste of space if you ask me!!
Paul, London,
Why is it that a handful of individuals who have no more experience of life than the rest of us should sit in judgement to decide who and what we can watch. What gives anyone the moral right to make that decision. Surely parents should be aloud to decide that for their children.
John B, Chichester, UK
In physical terms, the population is growing more mature faster and earlier than at any time before in history. In mental terms we are being pushed further and further backwards through overprotective meddling by self appointed guardians. This is uneccesary persecution by the unwelcome.
David, Manchester, UK, Britain
"British Board of Film Classification"... Internet clips are not "British" and not "Films". They do not warrant "classification", the web sites do. Web content classification is NOT the remit of the BBFC.
David, Manchester, UK, Britain