James Christopher
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks

Certificate 18, 97 mins

Deep concern about the failing crusade in Iraq is exerting a profound influence on an industry that is frequently cursed for its total disregard for the real world. Films that illuminate topical issues are starting to invade the multiplexes. 28 Weeks Later is a blockbuster horror that chimes noisily with local fears: immigration, needy strangers, feral disease and Draconian laws. The young Spanish director Juan Carlos Fresnadillo was hand-picked by Danny Boyle, the original director of the cult hit 28 Days Later, to inflict maximum panic with a sequel.
Boyle’s original was a sensation. He posited the believable notion that a doomsday scenario would come from within: a virus, not a meteorite, an alien invasion, a nuclear war or wonky robots. Given the Iraq War, Fresnadillo’s follow-up should have been as pungent as a Stilton. It’s a criminal disappointment that it isn’t. The satire, written by Rowan Joffe and Fresnadillo, might have looked sharp on the page a couple of years ago. But it looks desperately crude now.
The first reel of 28 Weeks Later is almost as impressive as the original, in which Cillian Murphy woke from a coma to discover that the entire population of London had been infected, or eaten, by zombies. The latent power of Fresnadillo’s first act is that it doesn’t lift a missing finger to put us on edge. No need for hysterical newsreel to tell us that we’re back in crazy, viral Britain. We don’t even need the original cast. The unsettling fear of the first 20 minutes is that almost nothing happens at all. Almost.
Robert Carlyle and his wife prepare a tinned meal by candlelight for a group of refugees in a remote farm cottage. The cabin fever is stifling. Snatched moments of intimacy are full of dread. Yet the tension is terrifically understated. A sudden hammering at the door sounds the first note of hysteria: a young boy seeks instant shelter from a rampant posse of the living dead. The shafts of daylight are a clever shock as the infected punch splintering holes through the shutters and walls. There is nothing quite so surreal as blind panic on a bright summer’s day.
The second act begins 28 weeks later and explores the guilty price of survival. Fresnadillo cleverly adopts the iconic images – spectacular shots of deserted London streets – and the kinetic tics that made Boyle’s film such an instant smash. But the plot is porridge. The infected have died of starvation. The American Army has set up a base on the Isle of Dogs, and the first refugees are flown back to City airport. Carlyle is reunited with his two perky children, who may or may not have a unique genetic resistance to the zombie virus, but a fresh outbreak ensures that no one has time to find out.
The American military overreacts, and the film rapidly degenerates into an Escape From Canary Wharf video game, with soldiers shooting anything that moves, and crowds of shrieking innocents running for their lives from bullets, tanks, helicopters and zombies. The dig at trigger-happy American occupiers does nothing to illuminate a drama that we now regard with weary familiarity.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles



2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
What? Americans always intervene in things. Is it so bad that this isn't a exception? And what did you want the military to do? Take 1 minute so they can analyse which are and aren't infected? I think this was a good movie...
John, Auckland,
Not a good movie in my eyes. Why? Unrealistic and ordinary.
Has there ever been a horror movie in which the protagonist is a well equipped, well trained soldier that does everything right and thinks before he (or she) acts and who does not have to take care of stupid and careless kids, teenagers or other unnecessary people? Come on! These kids arrive in a zone that could not be more dangerous and what they do is sneak out to get hold of a PHOTOGRAPH (!) of their mother. Heck?
We've got maximum security everywhere... dozens of soldiers are guarding the train station though the people are coming from outside London ... while the mother is left alone in this room, no medical supervision or anything. Daddy takes out several elite marines who, in spite of the constant danger and their own awareness, just stand there instead of shooting.
So in the end, all we've got is "stupid people running away from zombies". Okay, the zombies are fast. That's a plus.
Camera and scenery are superb ofc..
Medic, Achern, Germany
I agree with the review and with the other person who agreed with the review. The movie was spectacularly directed, and the special effects and action sequences were amazing, but it lacked what made the first one such a great movie even to someone like me who doesn't usually enjoy zombie movies: an air-tight and compelling plot. All of the believability issues that Graeme mentioned stuck out to me too. It's telling of just how weak the plot was that in that scene where Carlyle gets infected and manages to somehow take down several armed soldiers, the director literally had to fudge the visuals (framing it as just artistic direction) to make it believable, because there was no way for that to play out in a visible believable way if we were shown everything.
Ian Robertson, Santa Cruz, California
You got the whole story wrong... they aren't stupid, slow moving, mindless, flesh eating zombies. They are far more than that. Quit undermining the genious of the Rage Infected. Sure the plot was weak, but there was still heart and emotion in the characters. What more do you want from them? It explains backstory of the lead characters and gives insight on a few others. One of the characters couldn't go on shooting innocent people and makes the decision to help the boy who escaped from his sights. I agree with Mike from Oxford... this review completely tears the movie apart. The movie did very well in my eyes. It scared me in a few parts, something that Dawn of the Dead and Land of the Dead couldn't do. I only laughed at those poor directed zombie movies. This movie had drama, suspense and horror. They all mixed very well and we can only hope they keep it up in the third movie.
28 Weeks Later surpasses 28DL, and it is by far the best survival horror movie I've seen to date.
Adam, Durango, United States
I have to agree with the review. I personally have not seen the first movie but was told that it was not necessary in order to understand this sequel. This was not encouraging as it indicates to me that the movie does not have a particularly strong plot.
Infact this is true. I cannot believe that one of the infected has the clarity and composure to open doors using a key card, and that the soldiers do not the capablilty to shoot Carlyle before he eats them. This is also true with the apache scene. Do they not have rockets? I thought they had rockets...
Graeme McLaughlin, Glasgow,
Much better than you say, almost as good as the first. You did comment on the very good parts, but you were unfair on the plot - yes it does degenerate slightly into the sinister military plot, but explains and supports it well.
Gus Gould, Putney,
I saw a movie called 28 weeks later yesterday. It's funny that this review shares the same title because the movie I watched deserved a better review than that.
mike, oxford, england
are you making a video game for 28 weeks later?
john ryan, allen park, michigan
Watched it last night, and indeed the plot wore thin where the american soldiers started shooting. What a let down. I could have just stood up and gone home if I wasn't with a group of friends. Pointless and tragically dull.
Rob Day, Reading, UK