Benedict Nightingale: A reviewer’s riposte
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday
Today is my 68th birthday, so presumably I’m a dead white male walking all too slowly towards my professional grave. Watch me rheumily slobber into my programme before hobbling off and, after a week’s senile reflection, goose-penning a review that attacks Katie Mitchell and Deborah Warner for being women. Funny that I regard them as maybe our two finest British directors – but dead white males are so capricious.
Oh well – I guess I admire Nick Hytner for defending Kneehigh’s production of A Matter of Life and Death. It was a bold choice even for his enterprising National; but the reason some of us weren’t enchanted was that the staging seemed showy and that Emma Rice and Tom Morris’s changes to the text had not made an already silly story less so – not because the director, also Rice, was a woman.
You won’t find a critic who isn’t delighted that the time has passed when it was said that all British directors were male, middle-aged and called Peter. The idea that male reviewers do gender checks on Warner, Thea Sharrock, Marianne Elliott, Annie Castledine or Anna Mackmin is preposterous. Myself, I resisted Mitchell’s Seagull but gave her Iphigenia five stars. Is that treating her with the same seriousness one would accord a male director – or misogyny?
A test of this “misogyny” might be her production of Virginia Woolf’s Waves, which our Samantha Marlowe reviewed and admired. But so did four over 50 male critics, among them the veteran John Peter. And the two males who disliked it did so because it was “arty” ( Telegraph) and “sterile” ( Guardian), not because Mitchell is female.
Let me defend my tribe. We have a far broader spread of critics, in terms of gender and age, than when I started reviewing. Personally, I vow to give up when I lose my sight, hearing, enthusiasm or belief in gender equality. And I’m stunned to discover that Nick, so correct in other ways, is an ageist bigot.
What do you think of Nicholas Hynter's opinion of veteran reviewers?

Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles



Find tickets for:

2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I don't really think Hytner hit the nail at all, i loved the play but in retrospect if you look at it along with the rest of Rice's work you can hardly fail to notice a lack in progresion of the company. This of course is a shame because Rice is probably one of England's hottest talents but to keep afloat she'll have to pull a lot more tricks out of the bag. It can also be said that her theatre is generally not the usual cup of tea for the National Theatre's audiences and so understandibly some reviewers - de Jongh for example couldn't look at it with a fair and unbiased approach though i have to say a good review from de Jongh is probably more important to worry about. Any way on the whole you haveto look at what Rice's theatre is doing overall, more and more young people are being drawn in to theatre and inspired by her work which surely is one of the most important things for theatre nowadays. Although the fct that so many critics are so thoroughly outraged suggests a grain of truth
Hannah Mae, Totnes, England
Nicholas Hytner has made a valid point. The majority of audiences at the theatre are female. Inevitably there are plays which appeal to me as a woman, or me as mixed race, which are not going to resonate to the same degree with a white, middle-class, fogey-ish man. It is disgraceful that the critics are patting themselves on the back for the fact there are now a few female critics or 25% female directors (when the population is 52% female). Indeed, it proves the point.
LouiseHR, London, UK