Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition

What do you think about the Arts Council cuts? Whether you're a theatre organiser or theatre goer, have your say at the foot of this article
On December 12 the Northcott Theatre in Exeter reopened its doors after a £2.1 million refurbishment. The work was funded, in part, by the Arts Council. So you would imagine that Clarie Middleton, the theatre’s acting chief executive, was filled with nothing but seasonal goodwill towards her kindly benefactors. In fact, her thoughts were far from strewn with tinsel. Because, the day before, Middleton had received news that the Arts Council was proposing to withdraw its £547,000 annual grant.
“Why invest in a theatre you had no confidence in?” asks Middleton. “They think we won’t go under without subsidy? Watch us.”
Different theatre companies are singing a similar song across the country. At the moment, all changes in funding are provisional – the Arts Council has recommended that 194 arts organisations out of its portfolio of 990 receive cuts in funding. And until it’s all made official at the end of this month, it can’t comment on which those organisations will be. If you’ve heard about theatres facing the axe, it’s because the theatres have gone public about it, not the Arts Council. Meanwhile those theatres and theatre companies have until January 15 to plead their case.
“They’ve said we can respond to their recommendation, and we intend to,” Middleton says. “But in reality they can’t back down in any real way without losing all credibility. Perhaps two of those 194 decisions will be overturned, no more. It’s an absolutely ludicrous position we’re in.”
Despite fears that the 2012 Olympics would neuter arts funding, many companies breathed a sigh of relief when, in October, the Government awarded the Arts Council a £1 billion settlement. What has ensued, though, is the biggest shake-up of its client lists in the Arts Council’s 60-year history. So what will it mean for theatre? And will the outcome really be just, after the council’s regional divisions make their final decisions between January 15 and the end of the month?
Peter Hewitt, the outgoing Arts Council chief executive, points out that 746 organisations have had “good” or “very good” news. So are those who have lost out just the victims of a long overdue, prudent prune? Or is it, as theEvening Standard put it, a “bloody cull”?
The former, says Sarah Holmes, the chief executive of the New Wolsey Theatre in Ipswich – described by the Arts Council as one of its key regional theatres. “I’m impressed with their bravery,” she says. “Everyone’s been saying it needed a big shake-up, although it is devastating for companies losing their grants.”
Even those organisations that have been hit agree that cuts were needed. Ivan Cutting, the artistic director of Eastern Angles, which tours theatre to East Anglia’s rural communities, says: “There has to be change, nobody would dispute that. Otherwise, how could new companies come through?”
But the Arts Council’s proposal to reduce Eastern Angles’ annual funding from £218,000 to £115,000 is based, according to Cutting, on “a very strange rationale. They aren’t disputing the quality of our work. They’re saying we don’t tour widely enough. We tour to four counties. They’re rushing decisions through because the settlement came so late from Government. As a result, terrible mistakes are being made.”
A similar picture emerges from Queer Up North, the Manchester-based gay and lesbian festival, which faces a withdrawal of its £98,000 grant. Jonathan Best, the artistic director, agrees that “there has to be refreshing of the lists. But they have to be based on a coherent, transparent policy, and from where we sit, they just aren’t.
“We’ve been told our audiences are too small, and yet we sold 70 per cent of available tickets in the 2007 festival, the first under new management. If they want to make a case against us, make an honest one. And giving everybody 18 working days over Christmas in which to cobble together a response is madness.”
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Excuse me. Why should the taxpayer fund a small elite's personal pleasure? To all of the whinging and moaning actors out there - some of whom are well known and well heeled I would imagine - cut your cloth accordingly. If a theatre has X amount of seats then whatever is paid for is the available money to spend. If the play or show cannot fund itself then let it die. Or pehaps the main actors or actress' get paid according to the money the punters bring in through the door, not according to their egos and over inflated sense of worth. Adrian above is correct unlike the psuedo intelectual Dave. There would be a public outcry if Led Zeppelin or AC/DC were funded by the taxpayer. Fortunately they do quite the reverse and bring in lots of tax revenue from a variety of sources. I have no issue with the theatre - I regularly visit ours and am a Friend who pays a yearly subscription to help it survive. However if the plays and shows cannot put bums on seats then who is to blame?
Mark Chisholm, Dereham, UK
I have a money raising project that I have put into operation in an amateur theatre for the last 20 years. We are one of the most solvent theatres in the country and this scheme runs year on year and just produces more money. We have had no grants we have done our own extentions and internal work, paid off a mortgage on another building all from our own resources. I have written articles in Amateur Stage and The Little Theatre Guild magazine and have encouraged many theatres to do the same. Amateur or professional this project will work for both - costs nothing to do, just time, and is community based. I am willing to help any theatre work out a way in which a similar idea could work for them. I believe theatres should have the freedom put on shows without restrictions, not put on shows because that is the only way they can receive funding. Help your community and help yourself - it's win win.
Anita Dalton, Kenilworth, Warwickshire
Adrian Leahy - your comments are ignorant and uninformed.
Does this mean that we should just show the top 10 films across the country, just play the top 10 pop songs all day on the radio, and and get rid of anything less popular.
Of course not.
Theatre is extremely enjoyable and a huge number of people enjoy going to the theatre on a regular basis. It is a completely different experience from the cinema and both can be enjoyed on their own merits.
I think regional theatres need to plan their programming so that it contains a mixture of sure fire hits to subsidse their more experimental work. If people are
tempted to go once then they are more likely to go back.
As for things that are subsidised by the taxpayer I never go to football matches and yet as a taxpayer I pay for the large number of additional police that are required to police them. Why should I do this? Football as a sport is rich enough.
I would far prefer to subsidise the arts.
Dave, Poole, England
Theatre as a popular art form is dead. A minority interest subsidised by the taxpayer. If it were not for elitist ideals and history it would have never have lasted so long. How many of us really read Shakespeare in bed at night for pleasure ? How on earth can it compete with cinema in the future ? If it can't sell on its own merit, what are we going to achieve by pouring more money into it ? Led Zeppelin I note did not need any subsidies from the Arts Council to sell out the O2 arena. I will pay to go and see live music, but I never go to a theatre, nor obviously does the majority of the rest of the country. If it's so fantastic I have no doubt the afficionados will pay at least £100 for a ticket, I would pay at least double that to see a great many famous unsubsidised classic rock bands. How would theatre goers feel if the Arts Council subsidised my rock band tickets ?Theatres would love to operating with the profit margins of rock tours - but nobody wants it any more. Let it go.
Adrian Leahy, Preston, UK
Growing up in the Guildford area in the 1950s, we had the choice of 3 thriving professional repertory theatres at Guildford, Leatherhead and Farnham who performed everything from Arthur Miller dramas to comedy. Times changed. Money was raised. The repertory system died and in its place we had new commercial theatres, the Yvonne Arnaud, the Thorndike, the Castle. Now 2 have closed and the third is facing financial ruin because of withdrawal of its grant. What is the Arts Council playing at?
Jennifer Lane, Bath, UK
Hi there it was interesting to read the article today having heard rumours regarding the Arts Council funding changes, I in particular am devastated at teh thought that The People Show Studios in Pollard Row Bethnall Green are under threat form a reduction in funding. They have been pushing the boundaries of performance art and theatre for over 40 years. As a company they bought (mortgaged) there own space in the late 80's. this allowed the company to use the space for community projects, workshops and local enhancement of the delights of theatre. In conjunction with this they continue to produce boundary challenging theatre within there own space and on lengthy successful tours. The typical audience ranges from die hards, like my wife and I to tourists locals and Time Out readers taking a punt at something different.Whilst I acknowledge that state funding needs to be constantly reviewed to give 'best value' this should not be at the detriment of excellence. Chris and Genni Renehan
chris renehan, loughton, essex
One of the threatened theatres is the Yvonne Arnaud at Guildford. It is the last of three small local theatres, those at Leatherhead and Farnham having already closed. Naturally it can't compete with the enormous and very commercial Ambassadors at Woking, but it puts on a varied diet of mainly good productions. Also under threat is the Mill Studio theatre, on the same site, which does more experimental work. The Arts Council have demanded more 'Ethnic' plays, but who are their intended audience? Few 'ethnic' people live in the area! When such productions have been staged the audience numbers have crashed. The audience is mainly middle-class and middle-aged , but that is the demographic nature of the Guildford area. Why should we be denied our entertainment? The theatre is thriving. The letter sent to the Council stated that there could be NO APPEAL unless the proceedures regarding the closure were irregular! So what hope have any of the threatened theatres got of a reprieve?
Valerie Thompson, West Horsley, Surrey