its nice that she wanted to give the dog a loving home, but she should have talked to Mutts and Moms first. im sure they would've been understanding and let her change owners, and Ellen should've read the contract more carefully. I do think its really nice that she wanted to make the family and dog happy.

Kathy, San Jose, Ca

Ellen signed a contract to take a dog, she broke the contract by giving the dog away, end of story. The agency had every right to take the dog back. If this family wanted a dog so bad, they should have gone out and adopted a dog of their own. She should have surrendered the dog back to the agency. Her tears are out of line-she is out of line. I understand she's done this multiple times before. What is wrong with so many of her friends, that they cant adopt a dog on their own? Why is she adopting dogs, then giving them away? If she wants to buy dogs and give them away, simply go to the SPCA or the local shelter that does not require contracts, etc. Then she could buy all the dogs and give them all away and no one would say anything.

Jami B., ventura, ca

Ellen had the right to give the dog away to a loving family she thought she was doing the right thing she then realized that it was not and then she said that she was sorry on air. And I hope that the owners of Mutts and Moms was watching and then realized how stupid they were to take the dog away from that family that had small children. And as if that wasn't bad enough, they aren't going to give the dog back. Take them to court Ellen they let you adopt Iggy they should have told you that if you thought your home wasn't suitable that you could give him to someone else

Kaitlynn Ward, Kingston, Ontario

Go Mutts and Moms, you make your stand!

Sure the family could have been cleard, and the dog and family could be happy, but you've received death threats from some nuts! Heaven forbid you simply do the right thing, you have a point to make! You will NOT be bullied by circumstance! Frankly, any company that can't see past it's own nose, while pretending to be compassionate is not one I'd support. -But what do I know! Kinda reminds me of certain governments...

Luke, Beaverton, Oregon, USA

Yes, people are dying, kids are starving, war is at hand and a meteor will probably take out Bangladesh tomorrow. But seriously, Ellen adopted a dog that needed help and then gave it to a loving family when she couldn't take care of it the way it needed it. If you're angry about people discussing it then why are you wasting your time as well. Not to mention annoying others.

ladyannmarie, Sioux Falls, SD

Gee, more than enough people worry about the homeless, sick and all that. People caring for and about animals are few and far between. Every single charity you see on theTV, hear on the radio or read about is for the benefit of people. People can think for and look after themselves - dogs are completely reliant on humans. Please do not make statements like you did - it just makes you part of the problem.

veda, cape town, south africa

People are dying people and kids are starving without parents why is this a big deal. Really look at what is going on. A contract is a contract. This is what happens when you don't read or think because you are on tv these things don't mean you. Help feed homeless. I can't believe this is a big issue.

Gee, Los Angeles, CA

I hope everyone here takes as much time to help homeless kids and families as they are concerned with a Dog and two little girls who will be ok. We have all been disappointed in life. It will not be the last time they will be. We should all be focused on something to better the world. Global Warming is happening. Bless The Most High

Gee, Los Angeles, CA

Common sense is again being ignored for the sake of sensationalizm. Give the dog back to the family that loves them and please, please, please stop making the dog and the little girls suffer. It is total bs that a small dog can't live with a family with small children there are families all over the world as we speak with children and small dogs. When will we stop racking up the miles with the attorneys and the 15 minutes of fame and start exercising common sense.

Cindy Randazzo, Princeton, NJ

First let me say, I'm a huge animal lover. All animals. I'm 64 and until last year when my beloved Miki died in her 18 yr. with me, I had not been without a dog, cat, etc. since I was 3 years old. Although I can see both sides, a contract is a contract, I also believe that the dog's welfare should come first. I think that Ellen, upon realizing the dog was not compatible with her cats, should have gone and talked with Mutts and Moms to see if the transfer to the new home was possible. If they didn't agree, they had the right to take the dog back. Ellen, my dear, I don't think anyone would deny that your heart's in the right place, and because it was in the right place, you didn't take the time to think it through. Everyone has made poor judgment calls with the best of intentions.

Barb Ripple, Honolulu, Hawaii

I belive that if a dog is being loved and cared for that is all that should really matter. Do I think it was wrong of Ellen to make it seem like Mutts and Moms are the bad guys, yes i do find it wrong and very disturbing. Though the whole point of these pet adoption agency are there for to make sure that these pets get a loving and carring home. That is what Ellen thought she was doing, but she did do it in the wrong.

Corra C. Kelly, Hazel Park, MI

It is irrelevant whether the dog might be well placed in Ellen's hairdresser's home or not. Animal shelters and placement agencies have years of experience and sound advice about what dog mixes, breeds and temperments do best in various family settings. It is one of the reasons why dogs can't be given away by adoptive families as they do not know "best". It is why they have contracts to protect the dogs. As a volunteer with a Golden Retriever rescue organization I completely support the agency taking the dog back. We have always fostered our dogs and evaluated what would be best for them. In this unfortunate circumstance, it might be best to observe this dog with the hairdresser's family to see if an exception could be made in the "best " interest of the dog! However, it is absolutely clear that Ellen was wrong in her decision to place the dog on her own. I feel sorry for the dog but certainly not for her not reading the contract.

toni Kalish, tucson, az

I'm an animal lover, but I think it's stupid and cruel that Mutts and Moms took the dog back when it had a good home. Who cares if it was in the contract or "standard practice?" Isn't that the ultimate purpose of rescue--to place a dog in a good and loving home? I agree that some of these rescue places go way too far in their rules. Some of them have such strict rules that likely no one would ever be able to adopt the pets.

Betty, St. Joseph, MO, USA

It is the rescues responsibility to find a suitable home for the rescued animals. They have rules in place for reason ... to avoid further abuse. Also to protect the children from an unpredictable animal, who has been abused A child would not know to treat these animals with additional tenderness.
Ellen just feels guilty and remorseful and rightly so!!!!

Tracey Bransfield, Cambridge , Ontario

I am a devoted animal lover.and I empathize and sympathize with ellen and her latest dog situation. However, she has a show to do and folks have gone thru much more and never went oublic in such an unprofessional manner. I think in the best interest of all, this situation should have been dealt with privately and Ellen should have kept it together. I lost a lot of respect I must say. Few can play the public sympathy card and win....she lost my vote.

CLeigh, Indianapolis, IN

The group is a Rescue group, not a shelter. Rescue means the dog was in an abusive/unwanted situation prior. The main priority of Rescue is placing the dog in an appropriate environment. As the entity that invests in the dogs well-being, vet bills, emotional stability, Rescue reserves the right to place their dogs where they see fit. This has nothing to do with bad breeders, local shelters, pet stores... What manner of retail store Mutts and Moms runs does not enter into the argument. Return of an animal that does not work out in a home IS STANDARD PRACTICE for Rescue groups. I'm sure Ellen was traumatized by this incident, but she should consider her influence ~ now the Rescue group is getting death threats?! What a kinder, gentler following Ellen has...

jenn, Moscow, ID

I have not gone through all of the other comments so sorry if this has already been stated. Not having seen the show, I am thinking that the reason she is upset in't really anything to do with the dog as much as it is about breaking the hearts of those two little girls.

Had it been any other pet, the results would have been the same. I think she is feels guilty about hurting the girls feelings.

And shame, shame shame on the adoption company. Finding a loving home with two little girls would seem better than existing in a kennel.

My daughter has three girls ages 15, 9, and 7 respectivley. They were recently entrusted with an 8 year old Poodle that had been owned my an elderly lady. This pooch has never been around children. She fit right in with these kids. Love is love at any age.

Karen Murray, Westerly, RI, USA

Dear Ellen

I am writing from Australia and am an ardent fan of yours. I find you much better to view than Oprah or the others. You seem so down to earth and sincere. I must state that I was also a fan of Oprah's but have now changed my mind as I have written to her on at least 3 occasions in the last 6 months without ever receiving some sort of response.

Here is where I hope you can assist. I am sure you have heard of the cruel animal fur trade. That is dogs, cats and other animals being skinned alive for their fur. Apparently this
happens in China. It has been said that the biggest buyers of these furs are the Americans. Can it be possible that the Americans could buy anything made from a dog or cat fur. if
people stopped buying the fur, there would be no need to
torture and kill the poor animals. As an animal lover, especially dog, my heart cries out as I cannot do anything. But
you could use your show to reach out to the people and thus save lives.

Marika Maselli, Gold Coast , Australia

It's sad they took her dog away but she should be professional enough to stay in character. The dog isin't dead or hurt and it will be cared for ellen had no business acting the way she did those people are there to see her and laugh not listen to her politics. Thats what a professional is, someone who does the job when they are sad!

Luke Fischer, Louisville, KY

Personally I think they should just give the dog back and stop being babies over it.

Karen, Visalia,

There is a very good reason for the age restriction with small dogs. I have a four pound chihuahua who was dropped, sat on and other wise not handled properly by kids. These tiny animals cannot protect themselves and up to a certain age kids tend to treat them like toys or not understand they are fragile.

Dogs and cats can get along, it takes patience and time. Saying that any home is better than going back to the agency is NOT true. Many dogs have been mistreated and badly hurt by people who do not know how to care for it. That is why the return clause in an adoption contract is there, so they can be sure to give a dog the proper home.

Patricia Edmonds, Fremont, CA

I think the world has bigger problems than sorry dog-owners and nazi shelters. C'mon people, let's move on already.

beagler, Norman, OK

Going on the air and crying crocodile tears in an effort to bully the adoption agency (as well as boost ratings for her show) like Ellen did is despicable. She got caught breaking a contract which she agreed to abide by and instead of behaving like an adult, threw a temper tantrum. Disgusting.

Ivan Stang, Los Angeles, CA, USA

I have volunteered with serveral animal rescue groups over the years. This incident does not surprise me. If I were to begin volunteering again, it would be with a "public" rescue group, our local SPCA. Private shelters seem to attract people with limited common sense.

I suppose that, in this electronic age, any people looking to add a furry person to the family might avoid this, by having a look at the contract (via email/ fax) BEFORE seeing the pet.
The person responsible for the animal really should be the one who "owns" it.

barbara, Surrey, BC, , Canada

Too bad children in abusive foster homes are not given better humane treatment. That two legged children are not immediately taken out of abusive homes before they are found dead is ok? But a dog given to a loving family with children who love it is not o.k to this organization? Shame on you Mutts & Moms. Why is it that local Humane Societys which adopt out dogs and cats do not follow up to make sure those animals are safe?

Donna Mogavero, Columbus, Ohio

This whole dog adoption thing has become totally outofhand. I recently purchased a dog from a breeder. I'm a responsible dog owner, having owned them my whole life and given them a good home and the best of love and medical care. I was harrassed by the breeder, asking questions about my personal life (who is she to determine my crendentials?) before I could purchase the dog. She insisted on money under the table $800 then insisted a sign a contract giving her co-ownership in exchange for the AKC papers. She wanted me to spend my own money (up to $30,000 ... I later found out) to have the dog trained to become "championship" material. Because her printer wasn't working I gave her the $800, purchased the dog and left. I did not sign the contract but have been harrased continously with phone calls and emails from her. She claims to be doing it as "ethical" means in concern for the dog, but she's really trying to get rich at my expense. Where are laws protecting us from this?????

strong, Sullivan's Island, SC

Good Morning, Loving Human Race,
Let's be adults here. Do we need a mediator and lawyers? In the non-public world, we could admit our mistake and have the Moms and Mutts people pull back and investigate the new home before going to extremes. As for having any rules for small dogs not going into homes with small children, I don't get it. They seem a perfect match. All ages get enjoyment out of canine- and feline-buddies. Why discriminate as long as the "home" checks out?! Ellen, I wish I could hug you. You've done all you can. You admitted you made a very human error and apologized. You've begged for forgiveness and made a plea for the children and their pain after yanking away Iggy. Fans, calm down. You only made things worse. Death threats? Come on! Marina Batkis and Vanessa Chekroun -- maybe you could just admit you overreacted and that you will review your policies from here on out. No biggie!!!! Fly me out and I'll take care of this for you, it's that simple! z

Rosanne, Mattydale, USA/NY

A contract is a contract. Let's see how Ellen would feel if somebody violated a contract's terms with her....

Izzy, North, North

I REALLY support ellen even though as she sad she sometimes has good and bad days but She has gained a fan which is me.I hope sometime she is reunited with that dog

Natasha J, Franklin,

When Ellen adopted that dog she thought that it would work but obviously it didnt. she wanted to find it a good home since she knew hers was not it. So she did. Once u adopt that dog its yours not the adoption agencies anymore. Yea the papers might say something but you adopted that dog it is now yours, and you do wat u want with it. I am totally against them taking the dog away i dont think they had a right to do that. I feel bad for Ellen because she was trying to do something nice and something she thought was right. She was only looking out for the dog and she got punished. Thats when the saying "No good deed goes unpunished" comes into play. I'm sorry Ellen, i would have done the same thing.

Melina, Los Angeles, California/ USA

Why is it so wrong to be emotional? Are we all supposed to be super composed and not let our emotions show - TV or no TV she was upset. Have a heart people!!!!

Tina Davis, New York / NY,

Its a Dog. Not Elian. This whole thing is stupid.

krytentx, Dallas, TX

Why not bring these things out into the open? Rescue groups do great work, but-they are over the top! I applied for a dog and was refused. But anyone who knows me knows my dogs are in a great home-pampered and loved. And my little dog does fine with my 5 and 6 year old grandsons. I trained the boys to be careful, that's all.
So what if it comes out on TV? I imagine Ellen didn't plan to break down. So come on America-give her a break!
Love ya Ellen!

Cheryl Johnson, Fresno, USA/CA

I was going to agree with the Veterinarian!!! Unless the children were actually harming the dog, why does it matter where this little puppy ended up?

Yes, yes...I understand there can not be broken rules just for the celebs, but for pete's sake, this puppy found a good home and the little girls, a new pet.

Shame on Ellen for using her show to air this, but I HIGHLY doubt it was planned to happen that way and gimme a break M&M!!! I read somewhere that the Balkis woman was unable to leave her home because she was on some sort of medication.

Do I smell and lawsuit coming on? On the grounds of stress brought on by death threats because Ellen announced this on such a large scale..bleh...M&M is in this for the mulah!

Brandy, Arlington, Texas

Oh please, please, please don't think that all Americans are this hysterical.

Jon Thomas, New York, NY

Ellen and M&M both come off poorly here. Yes, of course Ellen should have followed the rules, and maybe it was in poor taste to use her show as a forum for her personal troubles. But there are times when it's a very good idea to break the rules. If breaking the rules gives the dog a good, loving home, then what's the harm? Why can't the shelter make an exception, not because Ellen is a star, but because an animal got a good home? Are we so attached to the letter of the law that we've completely abandoned its spirit?

Monica, Brooklyn, NY

I am a veterinarian and I strongly disagree with the position of Mutts and Moms. There are so many unwanted pets and if there is a caring and receptive home why not allow them to care for a pet that might otherwise be euthanized. As for small dogs and families, that is a new one on me. Over my 45 years as a veterinarian I have placed all size pets with families and have found both small and large pets not suitable in particular situations. Yes rules are rules but who among us doesn't break them. I am certain Ellen was sincere and felt that she was doing the right thing for the pet, and I believe in my heart she did the right thing. Who reads all the small print. Just today I had a situation where I called about something where they gave me 30 days to repond and I missed it by four days. I am waiting for someone to think out of the box. Millions of pets each year are destroyed because homes can not be found. Be thankful this family was available and obviously gave Iggy a good home

Richard, Deltaville, Virginia

This whole story is so absolutely over-dramatized. I can understand how Ellen would be very upset but her televised reaction seems a little extreme. I also think it is completely absurd for an organization in the business of finding loving owners for pets in need of a home to insist on taking back the puppy. People just get more ridiculous every day.

Sherry, Slidell, LA

rules are rules,does ellen think she is above that?we addopted a dog,and have to live by their rules.is ellen more special or something?and ignorance of the law is no excuse,democracy is equal rights for all,special privileges for none.shame on ellen for the pure hell she is putting the "dog"lady through.ellen is acting just like paris hilton,wanting special treatment,and if they make a special acception for her,how about everybody else? rules are rules ellen,for everyone.

roberta hinchberger, Butler, Pa.,USA

Ellen seen the dog had a good home.
Leave her alone and the dog should stay with the family she gave it to.

Donna, windsor, pa

Ellen needs to follow procedure, as everyone else does. Procedure is that if the child wanted this dog, the adult...that would be Ellen, should teach her the procedure is to go to the adoption agency and fill out the forms to get the dog! Very simple, and it WAS NOT followed. We MUST follow rules. Ellen must feel she does not and is using celebrity to get away from following rules; also, she did not teach the child that she must follow rules.

sandy regg, mcmurray,

Since when are 11 and 12 year olds girl's too young to have a dog - it's not like the dog had temperament issues!!. That's just an insane, limiting rule to begin with and just keeps dogs from having good homes. Most families want a dog to share their life with their children and pre-teen girls who want a dog would be a dream home for any true animal activist!
These particular animal "rescue" people have voiced their disdain for celebrities and are on a power trip. They obviously expected a huge payoff from Ellen instead of the crazy on-air breakdown and their extortion backfired. They clearly don't have the best interests of the dog at heart; they've even confessed that they're punishing Ellen for her prestige and reaction, rather than doing what's best for the dog and the children.

What's in the best interest of the two teenage girls and the puppy. That's the only thing that should be considered here.

Tracy, Georgetown, MA

Though Ellen's intentions were true, she was clearly in breach of contract. This entire situation is fraught with emotion from Ellen herself, to her hairdressers children - but this does not mean that Ellen can make her own rules simply because so many people are upset. She messed up on this one big time and did not read the fine print on the contract. This shelter has these rules for good reason which keep the animals best interest as their primary concern. Not all animals are adopted by wealthy entertainment personalties with many options for the placement of an animal. These polices provide families who can no longer keep an animal with a way out. Ellen should have quietly apologized to her hairdressers family as this was entirely her doing. Instead, Ellen mis-used her show as a public forum for her personal errors in judgment. Ellen has tarnished the reputation of a business that may not recover from this drama. Shame on you Ellen, shame on you.

Michelle, Toronto, Canada

As a dog trainer proffessional I have to admidt Ellen you did the right thing! If they did not want the dog to go to a home with young children they should have done a home inspection and informed the new owners that they were going to keep a close eye on the environment until they were sure all was right for the dog. Any home is better then a kennel providing that the home provides proper care. Ellen chin up girlfriend we are here for you and feel your pain. God Bless. Lynda

Lynda Kasheta, Margate, Florida

I think that when the agency found out that Ellen breached the contract, they immediately see money opportunity! Win the lawsuit and get tons of money...especially, from a celebrity like Ellen! Such a shame! Greed! I understand Ellen made a mistake and at least, she admitted it. Was the mistake so horrible and such a crime? I understand the agency wrote the contract to protect the animals (hopefully!) but, in this case, is Iggy being mistreated and abused? No! The agency should screen the new family and if they treat Iggy w/love, then have them complete the adoption paperwork and work on placing the next poor animal in their shelter. They should be happy for Iggy for finding a home! Give the Iggy back to the family. Do it for Iggy if not for anyone else. Iggy is the victim here.

Linda, new york, ny

With the daily death count in Iraq averaging somewhere around 100 per day, it's no wonder Americans (and apparently Brits as well) are wringing their paws over the fate of DeGeneres' little mongrel. As the character of Gordon Gecko in the film 'Wall Street observed, "That's the thing about WASPS, they love animals but hate people" - and I believe he also may have offered that if ... "You want a friend, get a dog". I personally don't agree, but there it is. What a wonderful century we're having!

Elisha Moor

Elisha Moor, London, England

Mutts and Moms should be so embarrsed about all of this. Who removes a dog from children who are well old enough !!! This kids aren't babies, they are pre-teens for gosh sake!!! I stand behind ellen the whole way. Maybe if more people stood up to all the idiots in the world , we would have alot more peace!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Kristi Mcmullin, Big Valley, Alberta, canada

Get a life people!

John, Santa Barbara,

The last time I checked, not all of the American Media was in a frenzy. Maybe the Enquire or People but the more "worldly" news have more substance to write about it. Don't feed people false facts. Yes, it happened but believe it or not, most Americans and the media have other things to worry about. Poverty, Education, Crime. Bush, Iraq, The Housing Market, The Weather, Fuel Prices, The Cost of Food, etc.

Cher, Texas, USA

My God, Ellen! The mistake was YOURS! Bonded with the dog after what, 1 or 2 weeks? 11 and 12 years old is old enough to understand and accept an apology from you! GROW UP, Ellen - using your show for sympathy in your private life is disgusting! The repercussions on this agency is even more disgusting! If I were them I'd sue you! I thought you were smarter than the average hollywood brat who uses their celebrity to get away with EVERYTHING! In case you've forgotten what real people do when they make mistakes - they live with them!!!

Irene, Vancouver, Canada

Oh please! This should never have been brought to your show.
This should have stayed a private issue, now you are responsible for this agency getting death threats. Porshe signed a contract, knowing full well the rules that are inplace to protect the animals. If you didn't agree with the rules then you should not have brought the dog home. Why should they make concessions for you? Using your show in this way has made me decide to never watch your show again.

Wanda, Allen TX

wanda , Allen, TX

It's just a dog!!! and not even an abused dog, why are Americans so overly concerned with the well being of dogs and cats and not human beings that suffer every day!? these very same people can watch men women and children go hungry and starve to death or die from preventable diseases if there was affordable healthcare! but let a dog or cat fall down a well or get taken from a family and here comes the tears, we don't show are humanity by how much we care for animals but by how much we care for each other....

Lee, Riverside, CA

This whole story sounds like a Judge Judy episode.

"You signed a contract? Too bad. Case dismissed."

I'm sure the shelter is such a bad place for the dog too. I'm also sure that the dog won't be adopted by someone else. /sarcasm

Wake up people. If anything, you should be on Ellen for using her show to somehow get out of a contract she signed.

YeahRight, DC,

as a rescuer, I can respect the need for adoption contracts and home visits to ensure that the dogs are placed in loving homes. We know that these dogs come into rescue with baggage and the last thing they need is to go into another bad situation. However, Ellen made an honest mistake and the family does love the dog. I am hoping that Mutts and Moms rescue will have a change of heart. And for anyone that is making death threats to the rescue folks.................that is just plain wrong! Please Mutts and Moms, consider the family as a potentially adoptive home and consider the dog who has been bounced from family to family.

Dr. Arleen L. Wheat, Pittsburgh, PA

Why can't they make just one exception in this case and return the dog to the family? Seems like the right thing to do. I imagine the dog would prefer it if it could talk.

Connie, Atlanta,

this is just plain and simple. give that family the dog back! have them sign the adoption paper. there are so many unwanted pets; dogs & cats that are starving. ellen ensured that the dog was in a loving and caring home. nothing agaisnt ellen, however, those grils are much better parents to iggy than ellen because ellen is probably home less. and due to her hectic career, iggy would not get as much attention. GIVE IGGY back, she's better off. I can't believe a caring pet shelter would do something like this! You're suppose to place them in good homes! What's the real issue here??

leslie, chicago, usa

Some of these adoption agencies are so crazy and self rightious that they loose sight of what is important and in the best interest of the animal.

Lori, Dayville, ct

Number one RE: the comment (above or below--- last or first[?]) What does that have to do with this incident at all? This is not about someone abusing or toying with a dog; this is about someone taking a dog away from a loving family that thought they were being blessed with a dog to love. These so-called "animal rights" people need to get down off their pedestals and look at the world for what it is. As for Ellen, yeah, she had every right to vent on national TV, Letterman and Leno do it almost every night, why not during the day? Are we too sensitive for that?

bogiehead, Portage MI, MI USA

Once again, a movie star thinks they are above the rules. Sadly, the victims are the dogs and the children who are innocent in all of this. Adults making poor choices, not following rules, will later expect these two little girls to follow rules. If we as adult break rules when it is "convenient or we deem necessary" then why do we get scandalized when the youth does it? Bad precedent. Shame on Ellen for using the media and her fans to arouse sympathy.

Marcia, melbourne,

Shame on Ellen for thinking she can violate the terms of an adoption agreement and for using her television show to incite reaction for her side. If she had adopted a child and decided she didn't want it would she then have turned it over to someone?
As someone who adopted an animal, I know the procedures by the rescue groups to ensure that the animal will be in a safe, loving home for life. and I applaud Mutts and Moms for their actions.

Barbara, Austin,

Okay to respond to the first response here. These are not "young children", they are 12 year old girls. Well past the stages of pulling on dogs tails and taking their chew toys to chew on themselves.

Jennifer, Grand Haven, MI

They are so wrong! Mutts & Moms is not representing this mom because anyone with brains understand the attachment between pet and child. They might have had the legal upper hand but they did not show good morals or ethics. I will never donate or support them.

chavonne, houston, texas

In my opinion, animal shelters prime concern should finding good, loving homes for the animals it shelters. If the home Ellen placed the dog in is a good, loving home, why shouldn't it be left there?. Was the dog poroerly cared for? Was the yard fenced? Was it being fed properlyand had it been seen by a vet? Did the family abide by the local laws ensuring the animal was taken care of properly? If all of these things were done, why was the dog removed from the home.?

Glenna Wall, Artesia, NM

I agree - screen the family and let them have the dog if they pass. Having a puppy is a good learning experience for children. The rescue place is supposed to have the dog's best interest at heart - so what gives with this place? Don't make Iggy go to yet another home.

Pam, Vancouver, BC, Canada

I can not beleive that you can take a puppy from a home you do not approve of, yet children can stay in homes with parents that should not have ever reproduced! How can this work! Ellen is a wonderful person, her assistance has a job and probably takes great care of her home and everyone living there. It makes me sick when power goes to those who abuse it... leave the good people alone and use your energy to do something with the people who are mistreating their animals... I have adopted a dog before and I thought it was crazy that you had to complete so much paperwork, yet anyone can have a child... come people get real... give the damn puppy back and find something noble to do with your life!

Sherry, Dixon, California,

Having been involved with a pet rescue agency - and never again mind you - I'm not at all surprised by their actions. My experience is that these people take animal protection to such an extreme that good homes are overlooked and intelligent decisions - like the one made by Ms. DeGeneres - are over ruled because they don't fit in with their narrow ideology.

When people talk about "animal nuts", that is a perfect description for the folks that run such animal rescue agencies.

Not only do the people involved suffer, so too does the animal all because a contract wasn't followed. Screen the family and then move on, or find that people stop calling and/or donating to your agency folks!

Derek, Kingston, ON

Ellen did the right thing...give the dog back to the little girls. What kind of pet rescue place is this anyway?
Pat, glenwood Springs Colorado

Pat, Glenwood Springs, Colorado

What is up with these people that run this business? Everybody on the Planet knows what an animal lover that Ellen is - do they really think that she would give the dog to people that would not love and care for this little guy? Ok so maybe they have their rules and even Ellen has admitted that she never read the fine print and did break the rules unknowlngly. However does this business go right to your home and check on the animal because it that's not the case they wouldn't even have known about this if Ellen hadn't have been honest with them. Maybe they need to look at changing their policy after this, maybe my children were the exception which I doubt, but an 11 and 12 year old are more than capable of feeding, walking and playing responsibly with a dog. They are not babies. My personal opinion is that the people that own this business are now just trying to gain publicity for themselves because of Ellen's celebrity status. Everybody wants their 15 seconds of fame!

Karen E. Anderson, Fort Nelson, BC, Canada

For heavens sake. It's inhumane to take the dog from a loving home. I have never heard of such a thing happening. I have adopted dogs before and never had to agree to anything so crazy. Obviously, those people don't have any heart. I feel sorry for the rest of the animals at that shelter. Cindy, Mt. Olive, IL

Cindy DeBoard, Mt. Olive, IL

OMG First the war and now this. What is the world coming to? Amerca really IS spinning huh!

Tim jones, springfield,

Please, Ellen broke the rules. The rescue group has the contract for a reason. If she doesn't have the sense to deal with this puppy, then what gives makes her think she can find an appropriate home for it? Any experienced animal person would know that terriers don't get along with cats. She's doing it for the glory of telling her 'personal heartbreak'~oh give me a break. I've never liked her, and this just makes my opinion even stonger. Ha, and I bet she'll have a hard time finding somone to sell/adopt a dog to her now....

Kathleen, Austin, Texas

Let's all step back a moment and look clearly at what Ellen said.
She got the pup Sept. 20th (today is Oct. 18th).
She said she spent $3,000 on training the dog, especially to help with acclimating the dog to her cats.
The dog couldn't get along with the cats and was "hyper."
She gave the dog to her hairdresser.
The dog has "bonded" with the children.


1. Successful training is NOT accomplished in less than a month, especially in regards to integrating a new pup into a home with other animals - regardless of how many thousands of dollars have been spent.
2. Dogs do not "bond" in a matter of days or a couple of weeks. This dog was in 2 homes in less than a month.
3. What puppy isn't "hyper?" That's what puppies ARE.
4. A contract was signed. This couldn't have been the first contract Ellen's ever signed. I hope she reads her employment contracts.

C'mon! Read the fine print before you sign. And give the dog a chance BEFORE you throw in the towel! Train, don't complain or inflame

Patty, Metrowest, MA

I run a dog rescue. When we specify in a contract that a dog is not to be adopted to a home with small children it is usually for the protection of the children. We make these requirements for a reason. Nobody wants a child, or anyone else for that matter, to be bitten. Children and dogs are unpredictable, and some dogs just do not do well with kids. Rescues put their hearts into these dogs, and they take responsibility for them (usually because their owner's didn't). A rescue's whole purpose is to ensure that the dog has a loving home - if someone violates a contract and gives the dog away, the rescue can no longer be assured that the dog is safe. Ellen should have contacted the rescue and they would have been happy to screen the new home. She violated a contract - a contract that involves the life of an animal. Would she violate a contract with her TV show? Would she go on TV and cry if the network challenged her for breach of contract? Ellen needs to be an adult.

Carla Rasmussen, Omaha, NE

I own a kennel. I love all my dogs. I would be glad to know my small dogs are going to a loving home and not a shelter. I would be glad to give these children a dog to love but it wouldn't be Iggy. This is crazy.The good and right thing to do would be to give the kids the dog. Where it would be very much loved by kids and a family who cares. Contract or no contract . Do the right thing.Ellen is a very caring and giving person. She made an honest mistake but don't penalize her.She ment well. Lets do the right thing and give the dog to the kids. Two wrongs don't make a right.

Shelley , Novinger, USa/Missouri

Mutts and Moms should look beyond their silly contract and see that the doggy was going to a great home..I mean can we have a little common sense here?..I am supporting Ellen and her friends and family 100%..Best wishes Nikki

Nikki Magnusson, Las Vegas, us/nevada

I have to wonder how much of this is driven by the Mutts & Moms being "done out" of a second adoption fee. To not even consider the family who had the dog as an option seems like a very unreasonable stance from an organization that's supposed to help these animals. And given the age requirements, I don't understand where the "Moms" part of the name comes from! I can just picture some room full of little kennels stuffed with small dogs they won't adopt out... It would be interesting to see where Iggy is now.

NBerg, Seabeck, WA

What kind of place is Mutts and Moms? Give me a break and give Iggy back to the little girls!!! This is really a no-brainer. Can we move on now??

Rita Zech/Pet Lover, Rowlett, TX

The problem is, what if she passed the dog onto a bad home?
They have to have some rules. Surely the family can go to the Rescue organisation and get the puppy in a legal manner.

Daniella Labi, Frankfurt,

Rescue groups do great things for dogs and people. Their heart is in the right place but in this case, it appears they were a little overzealous. I have seen some rescue group's forms that you sign and have signed a couple myself. Basically, you sign that they can come in and take that dog away from you if they feel it is in the best interest of the dog. In some cases the forms allow them to come in unannounced and practically forceably remove the dog. I would hope that they will reconsider letting the hairdresser's family adopt Iggy. If not,k I am afraid they will end up suffering from the long-range affects of Ellen's show. If nothing else, they will need to change their name as people will not want to adopt from them.

Carol, San Jose, CA,

Ellen Degenerate! You didn't need to take this private disagreement to the nation. What you did in one thoughtless swoop was mean and dangerous. You also obviously need a psychiatrist. A normal person wouldn't have an emotional breakdown over this. I'm not joking.

Pet Lover, Los Angeles,

Oh my god- is there no middle ground here? Jesus H Christ. These Mutt Mommies need to chillax.

Josh, San Francisco, CA

What a non-story. Much ado about NOTHING.

George, Miami, Florida

As a former Animal Control Officer and vet tech of many, many years...I can say in my experience that a home with 11 and 12 year-old children who are supervised and properly introduced and informed about the care and appropriate behavior around a small dog is a safe home for a small dog. I think that Mutts and Moms are doing a grave disservice to their organization, the pooch involved and this family. Shame on Mutts and Moms. I think they have litigation on their minds and this is WRONG!

Christine Delfino, North Haven, CT

I think that the adoption agency was way out of line. I work at a veterinary hospital and have for years and I don't think that the adoption agency had the dog's best interest at heart. Ellen is a very responsible and caring person and I don't think for a minute that she would give her pet to someone unless she thought they were capable of taking car of him. GIVE THE DOG BACK TO THE FAMILY!!!!!

Lisa M Davis, Norman, OK

It shows once and again that Americans are being unfairly portrayed as vain and empty people. How come THIS is what sends Americans into a spin? Don't you all have more important things to care about than this oh-so-personal-issue about a dog?????I bet a lot of people agree with me that Americans have much more on their plate to worry about than this petty issues.

Caterina, Manhattan Beach, California

Hey, Ellen:

Where is the French bulldog you were so in love with and adopted? Ellen has a history of buying dogs, throwing money at them, getting bored and giving them away to friends. She calls this rescue. This is not rescue.

And BTW: Brussels Griffons do NOT place well with children. They are very nervous animals.

Take responsibility for what you have done, accept the consequences. It's not about saying "oops, sorry", destroying someone's life, and then getting your way.

M. Smith, Syracuse, NY

Understandably Ellen made a mistake by finding a wonderful home for a dog that she herself took the time to adopt, care for and love, and because there were conflicts with other pets in the house she then took it up on herself to see that Iggy would go to a home where he would be loved, appreciated and played with.
The shame of it all, to have such a heart and actually take the time to make sure the animal has a roof over his head and a warm bed to sleep.
NO i say send the dog back to where he came from with no real identity, one on one attention and devotion to be known as a dog with a number rather than a heart.
Leave the dog alone to take his last breaths in solitude and unable to honestly feel that child's human touch and laughter.
Ellen apologized with so much heart. An honest mistake. We are human after all. She knowingly made sure that dog would be loved.Consider the fact she didn't drop him off on the side of the road as so many unwanted animals end up having done to them

Tanya!, Langley, BC, Canada

Just what is the backrounds of the do-gooders at Mutts and Moms? Did they have pets when they were 13 and less? Don't these people realize that it's good for the dog to grow up with the children and visa versa. There are parents there for the 10 and 12-year old to make sure that everything goes right. I don't watch Ellen's show, but I saw this article on the news. I agree with Ellen's choice, and the adoption group should be investigated officially. Their rules make it possible to have a dog put to sleep much sooner than what it really should. I'm glad we don't have the same rules here, and I hope the organization and the pet store they operate out of goes out of business if they don't give in.

Mark, Rochester,

I feel it's wrong what Mutts and Moms did. I hope the clinic shuts down because of actions of the owner.

I too once needed to find a new home for my dog (less than a year old). I was moving for a new job and my new place did not allow pets. He was my family and I had a hard time letting go of him. I learned my lesson the hard way that, returning him back to Animal Rescue for re-adoption was not the best choice.

I wish till this day. That I can turn back time and made more of an effort to find a family for him.

I donated a large sum to the Animal rescue hoping they work hard to find a new family. What did they do? Within 3 days they euthianize him.

Lets be honest here guys. The first place you think of when you want to find a new home for your pet isn't your nearest adoption agency. It should be someone that you know personally.

The risks of euthanize from an animal clinic is higher than a loving family. Think about it.

Sam, Small town, Idaho

a few people have called this a tragedy. get some perspective darfur is a tragedy, this is a celebrity lookig for attention

orla, limerick,

Why are they so concerned about the letter of the law and not the intent. If the intent is to find a good home , the dog has found one probable of its own choosing as animals do find people and bond with them as our animals we have gotten from animal shelters in the past have chosen us and we in turn have loved them for doing so. I can't understand the strictness of using a law in that fashion. Ellen has more common sense in her decision for the best welfare for the animal in my opinion.

Lee, Gladstone,Michigan, U.S.A

Maybe the ASPCA, the Humane Society, Best Friends, etc should look into the power trip that this one organization is on.
It's such a shame that this one organization is going to give all Rescue Organizations such a bad name. When people talk about this story they won't remember the specific name of the organization. Some will use the wrong name, some will use a generic name when talking of this story but in the end all Rescue Organizations, and MOST IMPORTANTLY THE ANIMALS, will suffer because one organziation thinks they are God!
All they had to do was visit the home and interview the family using their regular procedures. They could even make random surprise visits to ensure the dog is in a good home. But it sounds to me like they would rather follow this power trip they are on. I just heard on the news how to get even they have refused to give the dog to Ellen or this family which sounds pretty damn spiteful to me.

Barbara Bernard, Cumberland, MD

If I had to place a pet with a rescue I would expect the rules to adopt to apply to everyone.How can any rescue,in good conscience,allow special treatment to a person the original owner might not approve of.The original owners agreement with the rescue has to be respected.The terms that were in place when the dog was put with the rescue should not be subject to change according to the whims of an actress and her fans.What if the dog got passed around again and again?Would you want your dog subjected to the judgement of someone other than the rescue you had an agreement with?I wouldn't.If I found out any one had gone against the agreement that I depended on being honored,I would expect the animal to be returned to me,regardless of what anyone else thinks.Owners who trust rescues have a right to know that the agreement won't topple in the face of a spoiled actresses televised pity party.

marlee folger, north central, texas

Ellen is absolutely in the wrong and rather childish in her attempt to use children to get her way and salve her own hurt. She should apologize to Mutts and Moms and her hairdresser and their children.

Turnbaby, Central, Kentucky

I had tears in my eyes y'day when I watched. Are these people crazy or what? Thy're keeping the dog because they want to punish Ellen for being a celebrity and doing a good thing. Yes, she may have violated a contract but all you have to do is assess the home and give the children the dog. How mean can you be? Ignore her celebrity and deal with this from the heart (if you have one)!!!!

Donna, Orange, New Jersey

What does Ellen's coming out on her TV show have anything to do with anything. She is not one that stirs up trouble.

Sarah, Long Beach, CA, USA

Why don't they just charge the other family an adoption fee, and let them adopt the dog themselves? I work in animal rescue, and the point is to put the animal in a loving home. If these new people are a loving home, what's the big deal? Ellen herself violated the contract, and she should pay whatever fine is involved, but why is this agency choosing to punish the animal? Dogs do bond to their families, and when they are taken away, they suffer depression and confusion, just like any human would.

April, Pittsburgh,

Good grief it's an effing dog. There are much more important things in the world to worry about than someone breaching their contract with an organization. FFS enough already ANd yes I am a dog owner...

Al, Atlanta,

I read the article that indicates that the contract Ellen signed says that kids under 14 cannot adopt pets from this rescue center. My grandsons are 11 and 12 and they are fantastic with pets. Under the age of 10, maybe, but 11 and 12 year olds should be allowed to have a pet. I had my first dog when I was 5 and it was a good learning experience and the dog was a good companion.

I think the rescue center should interview the family and if the kids are nice kids, then the dog should be returned to that family. Watch how the dog reacts to the children and then decide - this to me is yet another type of discrimination - what happened to the American image of a boy and his dog??

Doris, Richton Park, IL

I tried to adopt a dog through a rescue organization like this one and was actually turned down! I have owned and trained dogs for more than 30 years. My husband and I live alone and are dog lovers. We can afford the health care and other amenities needed. We live on the lake in a lovely, safe, unpopulated area--lots of room for a dog to run and play safely. I had glowing references from my vet and neighbors. Every dog I've owned has lived beyond 15 years old! These people refused me quite haughtily saying they thought I would not like it if the dog barked or had an accident on the floor! I have no idea where that came from! I think many of these rescue people are on power trips and have control issues. They are the reason many of these dogs aren't adopted! This case with Ellen is an example. How could they even imagine that Ellen would not care for that dog properly with all the resources she has?

Patsy, Knoxville, TN/USA

isnt it the purpose of rescue groups to find homes for unwanted pets!!!! the bottom line is now yet another dog is homeless. this group is just being stubborn and hateful. think of how the animal is feeling, yes they do have feelings. it has been taken away from people who loved him.

karen , metairie, louisiana

It seems that Mutts and Moms should have evaluated the hairdresser's home and family life. If they found that the dog had been placed in a loving and caring home, they should have left the dog there. What an uproar this has caused, not to mention the distress this has probably placed on the poor dog. Shame on you Mutts and Moms!!!!!

DDouglas, Bayfield, CO

Give Iggy back to Ellen's hairdresser! Good Grief! What's wrong with these two women at Mutts and Moms? Like it's Ellen's fault they got death threats? Give me a break! To the two women at Mutts and Moms, go resue another dog from death row and give Iggy back to the hair dresser and her 2 kids with a new agreement. it's that simple. Being on the Ellen show could actually help you and all your other animals instead of hurt you and your business.
Be smart ladies, remember why you are in business, I hope it's FOR THE ANIMALS.
Karen Curious, NYC

Karen Curious, NYC, NY

I am not an Ellen fan in the least, but this time I am behind her one hundred percent. It seems that this "rescue center" is attempting to play God instead of trying to find a good home for the pets in need. I feel that the mission that should belong to this center has been lost or maybe never existed at all. A loving home should be at the top of the list and it is obvious that it is not. To take this pet that was so obviously loved and cared for away from this family is unspeakable.

Tammy, West Point, GA

Ellen:
I think it is awful how they could go into your hairdresser's home and remove the dog. The dog is probably very confused thanks to that dumb move. I know rules are rules, but in this case you were honest by letting them know you gave Iggy to a wonderful home. SHAME ON THAT AGENCY. Do they even care that you spent money and time to neuter Iggy? I commend your ability to show your true feelings and not hide them. You are truly an inspiration and I for one believe that you are the best animal activist. You are a GOD SEND AND AN ANGEL. I will pray for Iggy to return to that wonderful home.
Jodie, Russell, PA

Jodie Anderson, Russell, PA

I think the whole thing is just sad.
Rescue groups have this in their contract to hopefully help ensure that the pets they place don't end up in shelters or on the streets. Basically, it's saying they will take the animal back if you can't keep it.
The problem ? There was no reason not to check out the hairdressers family, have them sign the contract and let Iggy stay in his new home.
Having worked HEAVILY in rescue there ARE GOOD reasons for contracts, but exceptions have to be made ALL the time if you are really out for the best interest of the animals involved.

MK, Medina, Oh

Why can't the hairdresser go to the shelter and re-adopt. I don't like the threats the shelter is getting. Only will hurt & kill more animals

justine, bklyn, ny

It's all about control! Ellen pissed them off by not following their rules and so they are getting back at her. It's that simple. It doesn't matter if the hairdresser's home was wonderful and the children were visions of a Norman Rockwell setting. These two ladies deserve to lose their business if their attitudes are this bad. Are they really that shallow? It appears that way. Do they really think after all this that anyone will shop at their store? Ellen has apologized for her mistakes. Take the high road ladies and stop feeling sorry for yourselves. Feel sorry for the hairdresser's family. You don't even know them. "I can't sleep at night." No one feels sorry for you - don't you get it? You don't rescue dogs. You're on a power trip and you feel it whenever you find a home for a dog. Remember the book I'm Ok, You're OK. We're all in it for ourselves.

kathy simms, savannah, ga

shame, shame on the moms and mutts people. IF they really loved the job they were trying to do and IF they really cared as they say they do then they would know that a dog is like a child, the more homes you put them into the chances of a disfunctional and confused dog become very high. By Ellen giving the dog to her hairdresser the chances of Ellen keeping the connection to him <ie Auntie Ellen> was also very high. I assure you that animals are very smart , they know who loves them and do not. Ellen I feel for you, you are a wonderful person and as Auntie Ellen I feel your pain. And to you MOMS AND MUTTS, can you be sure that the people that you gave Iggy to didnt take him because he belonged to a famous person? Shame on you, I say that a thousand times, shame on you moms and mutts, who gave you the right to take Iggy away from such a loving home.

silkyleggs56, Winchester, virgina

I hate to say this...but could it be possible that "Mom's and Mutts" is trying to take advantage of Ellen's fame (and re$ources)? They know she is famous, they state they don't want to be "bullied", they have their lawyer involved...it sounds like the beginnings of a lawsuit (something that probably wouldn't be happening if the person that had adopted Iggy wasn't famous). I just hate how litigious our society has gotten! PLEASE...just give Ellen a break and give the darn dog back to the quality family that Ellen found for Iggy!!

Marie, Atlanta,

Like they say...contracts are made to be broken, that's why there are lawyers. My opinion, Mutts & Moms missed the objective of their mission, but a lawyer could have solved all this quietly. Now Mutts & Moms want to save face and are reacting with revenge.

Olga G. Roesch, South Plainfield,

I can imagine how hard it must have been for Ellen, the hairdresser's family, and Iggy, to fall in love with the puppy only to have him taken back to the shelter - that would really be painful for humans and puppy both. But the shelter I'm sure has those rules for a reason - they are also trying to protect the animals by not sending them to homes with small children. Kids can be really hard on pets! And if the shelter had made an exception, no matter how wonderful an environment the hairdresser's home might have been, they'd be setting a precedent that their rules, put in place to keep the animals safe, don't mean anything. Chances are probably pretty good that Iggy will find another loving family to take him in.

Faith, Iowa City,

Our family just adopted a pet from a pet rescue group too and we were so overjoyed to bring this dog into our home. Ellen knew what she was signing and she needs to just get over the fact that she did not abide by the rules and regulations set forth by the rescue group which looks out for pets. Stop being a cry baby!

Brandie, Stevens Point,

These people are only interested in "punishing" a celebrity - maybe in hopes of her settling some financial agreement with them for her mistake. SHAME ON THEM for caring more about their stupid policy AND themselves more than using common sense. This policy cannot be so important to these people that they would so publically use such "militant" tactics on 11 and 12 year old girls; holding this animal hostage until police arrive. Are we adults here or selfish assholes?

Threatening to bring in the media and police to enforce a policy that frankly does NOT make sense is the reason so many people are deterred from adopting from rescue centers in the first place. Paying a $250 adoption fee for an animal that is NOT neutered nor spade is gangster mentality and these women should BOTH have their shelter practices inspected by the ASPCA.

Pamela Clark, Tampa, Florida

Why can't people be human or just people anymore? If I had adopted a pet and it didn't work out I would have found a loving home for the pet also. It seems like Ellen knew the person she trusted the pet to, so what was the harm? My little girl is so gentle and loving with pets and it is ashame because she has allergies so she can't be around furry animals long. The agency should bend a little in this case and stop being so self righteous. It's not about Ellen, or her celeb status, the adoption agency or even the public, it is about those sweet little girls loving a puppy who needed a good home.

Elisa Edgerton, Jersey City, New Jersey/USA

Nobody has the right to void the conditions the original owner had every right to expect would remain in force.What's the point of trying to place a dog when the adopters can dispose of them according to their own judgement?The owners specifications as to the placement are of the utmost importance.They placed the dog believing that the rules would be respected and followed.Why is anything else even being considered?I follow the rules and expect others to do the same.Those who break the rules or expect special allowances for themselves are just spoiled or outright dishonest.I would take it to the nth degree to force them to stick to the agreement.It's a matter of principal.If they don't want to stick to an agreement they should not have made the agreement in the first place.I believe it borders on fraud.

marlee folger, north central, texas

Volunteers give their time to make sure these animals are never mistreated or neglected again. In a 3 minute segment, Ellen has prevented other dogs from finding loving homes thus dogs in shelters, neglected and abused are euthanized because there isn't room in rescue for them.

This could have been settled privately. Ellen is using her celebrity to get her way and to make some type of point. She shouldn't have given the dog away. Period.

The rescue was at fault for approving her as an adoptive home. It just goes to show you that you can't be too careful.

Pam, Lexington, Ky

Here's the real issue: Why did Ellen and Portia give up on this dog after only a few weeks? It can take weeks or months for a newly-adopted pet to adjust to a new home and other pets. Meanwhile, Ellen is in a position to afford to have a trainer work on this case full-time to make it work. Give me a break. Ellen and Portia--let's not forget her role in this--should be ashamed of themselves for adopting, then giving up on this poor animal.

Terry, New York, NY

I feel for Ellen at the moment, this is totally blown out of proportion. The main aim is to provide the animal with a loving home not become politically correct with all the garbage rules along with it.
These animals are traumatised enough let alone becoming a toy that is dragged from one place to another. Let the dog be, if it is in a good home let it stay there.
I live in Australia, believe me this kind of rot is happening here too.
Give Ellen a break and wake up to yourselves.
Mel. Sydney

Mel, Sydney, Australia

These people are only interested in "punishing" a celebrity - maybe in hopes of her settling some financial agreement with them for her mistake. SHAME ON THEM for caring more about their stupid policy AND themselves more than using common sense. This policy cannot be so important to these people that they would so publically use such "militant" tactics on 11 and 12 year old girls; holding this animal hostage until police arrive. Are we adults here or selfish egomaniacs?

Threatening to bring in the media and police to enforce a policy that frankly does NOT make sense is the reason so many people are deterred from adopting from rescue centers in the first place. Paying a $250 adoption fee for an animal that is NOT neutered nor spade is gangster mentality and these women should BOTH have their shelter practices inspected by the ASPCA.

Pamela, tampa, Florida

Ellen did the WRONG thing. Celebrities are not above the law! This poor rescue group is being responsible. They should be lauded and not threatened. Ellen needed to tell them and then her hairdresser needed to go through the adoption process. I assure you that if the hairdresser was a good home for the dog then they would have been approved. Treating animals like property to just give away is part of the problem. There are so many groups that let anyone take an animal with no checks and thye end up in labs being tested on, as dogfighting bait (it Vick your friend too Ellen?), killed inhumanely, left to fend for themselves on the street, with hoarders in in humane and filthy conditions...this is why any reoutable group checks people out!

Sad, New Orleans,

The dog should go back to the children. We have many abandoned dogs in the world. If this dog has bonded with this family and these children he should stay there. This is another example of the need of people to "follow rules". there are times when we must look at the situation and ignore ridiculous rules. I would have no problem with the company going to meet the family and seeing that the animal was happy and well taken care of. Anything beyond that is ridiculous. Egos have become involved and it appears that they (company members) have involved their egos. They are going to show Ellen G. they can force her to return the dog. Ev eryone should look to the best interest of the dog. He needs a loving family. do not take his opportunity for a loving family. to the company: Please overlook your own ego and look to the best interest of he dog. do not punish him because you want to prove that you can "win" against a t v personality. the only person who will lose in the wonderful dog.

Penny Douglass Furr, Atlanta, Georgia

It's sad that the place did not look into the family to see that the puppy was happy and safe. If it was in harm then by all means they should have taken it - BUT without that information they are wrong. I hope that the girls get their pet back and that the group apolizes to any good adoptive people of pets to say that they will work with people who have problems after bring a pet home and take suggestions from the person that adopted them. My heart goes out to you and the other family. Pets are people's family members and to just come and take it if they are good tothe pet is TERRIBLY WRONG!!! Ellen thank you for sharing your pain with and making pet lover aware of how some "businesses" operate without the care of the pet first.

Lynn Young, Pittsburgh, United States - PA

Everyone in rescue in Los Angeles already knows that this is NOT THE FIRST TIME Ellen has adopted an animal and then given it away. If she wants to do her own rescue, that's wonderful, but don't go to a rescue group and lie and sign a contract and then blatantly ignore it. Go to the kill shelters, save a life and find that animal a home.

SHE IS ABSOLUTELY WRONG and if I was in charge of the rescue group, I would sue Ellen for as much as I could get to make up for shutting the rescue down!

She should be ashamed of herself. She had no right to use her celebrity in this way. I hope her attorneys tape her mouth shut.

J, LA,

Ellen-I know that your heart and soul were in the right place when you made the decision to give Iggy to the family in question. Many people misunderstand why pet adoption agencies are so firm in their rules and regulations. They are because they have committed their lives to the rescue of unwanted and perceived unadoptable animals. They know the pitfalls that can occur when an adoption does not work out. In your situation, you signed an agreement and that agreement is in place for a reason. Dogs and families are carefully screened for appropriate matches. When that match doesn't work out, there may be behavioral issues or some other issue where the adoption agency can intervene and use professionals to sort out those issues. In your case, the agency had no idea why the placement didn't work out with you, nor did they have any knowledge of the family that you gave the dog to. Animal agencies have worked HARD to be recognized as legitimate; please help them remain that way.

jeannie, las vegas, nevada

I am a volunteer at a shelter. I have dealt with this kind of adoption agency. They are overrun with animals that are not getting the attention they deserve because the owners are going overboard on screening the adopters. Home visits and letters of reference form vets are required along with a hundred other qualifications just to adopt a homeless pet. It is sad that these homeless animals are put thru this.

Robin, Lamar, AR, USA

What difference does the age of the children make?? All Mutts and Moms had to do was send a representative to ensure the dog was being properly cared for and loved. But they didn't, and now they've got their backs up because they know they're wrong and won't admit it. Yes it was a breech of contract, but Ellen clearly didn't know that at the time, she admits she was wrong which is more than I can say for Mutts and Moms. Take a page out fo Ellens book and do the right thing, give Iggy back! Ultimatly what should be MOST important here is Iggy, not the hurt pride of Mutts and Moms.

Kerry, Brampton, Canada

Dogs have to be screened, as well as families, before pet adoptions are made! Animals aren't handbags to be given away to your hairdresser or manicurist when you find they don't work out. And some families might not suit all dogs--some dogs don't like small children and may bite. If her hairdresser wants this dog, then she can apply to the shelter, go through the appropriate screening process and be accepted. Perhaps this dog wouldn't do well in a house with small children or perhaps this would be a great match. We may never know since Ellen did this back-handed routine rather than being open about the fact that the dog didn't fit into her household.

Sorry Ellen, NO SALE! Sounds to me like she was afraid that it might get out that she returned a rescued pet. Whatever the case, please stand up and take responsibility!! Don't put this off onto the shelter, which is doing good work. And to use your celebrity status to bring pressure on them is shameful.

Bette Wilsom, Denver, Colorado

Ellen, the rescue groups seem to think they are god. My husband and I had a similar problem with a group here in Florida. We wanted to adopt a lab around 3 years old. My husband is a retired guide dog instructor so he knows how to handle dogs. We paid a $10 fee,(non-refundable), they sent someone to inspect our home, then we were told we could only get an elderly dog because of our ages, and no room for a young dog (they claimed it would break a young dog's spirit if it couldn't run. We have a fenced in yard, and know how to take care of a young dog. Anyway, we applied to another rescue group and they called my husband's ex-boss for reference. We now have a three year old black lab, who is a very happy boy! I know these people think they mean well, but the children are not toddlers. They definitely show their arrogance by refusing to give back the dog.

June Muisener, Homosassa, Fl

It is ok 2 find good homes for dogs but:
1. An agreement is an agreement.
2. There is a protective reason for such policies that most people do not appreciate. The dog is 1/2 blind, therefore is not quite prepared to be all times surprised by playing children. Reason? He can bite unintentionally, not always knowing who is next to him, and in trying to defend himself, the dog could be labeled violent, and either become homeless or euthasanized. This happened to me, where I picked up a dog from the street and placed it in my porch overnight for observation. The next morning, kids got him nerveous and he bit me. He was trying to protect himself, as he was trembling in fear. He was sent for rabies testing, and killed. In Iggy's case, there could be a possibility of the dog either becoming homeless or euthanized if he ever instinctively reacts, not knowing who is next to him.
3.The organization's 1st priority are the dogs and that is great. The owners should want the same if they love him.

Wan Marrero, Bay Shore, NY

I absolutely feel that you were in the right, Ellen. Not only do I think it's insane that they took it this far, but that they did it at the drop of a hat. No reasoning what-so-ever. There were many things they could've said or done to remedy the problem. But since this happened with a celebrity, all reason went out the window. The dog was happy, and you assured it that. I never would've thought about taking the dog back to the facility. As you said, it only matters that the dog is happy. Sadly, as apposed to what they say, the facility didn't take into consideration the dogs best interest. I absolutely commend you for standing your ground.

Jennifer Walters, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

I think people need to be made aware that when they "adopt" a pet from one of these "rescue" agencies that even though they give the pet a home, provide for its medical treatment, and are liable should the pet bite someone, the animal does not belong to them but remains the property of the agency whose whims must be indulged. I think if more people were aware of this fact they would adopt a pet from the S.P.C.A. instead. A member of their family that does not "belong" to someone else to do with as they please.

Joe Rlane, Media, PA

As I understand it Ellen and her partner broke the agreement. Just like the rest of us, I guess rules are rules. It is SO unfortunate that the little animal has to suffer thru all this. Too bad the hairdresser could not apply to get it but with the child age limit that stinks. So hopefully after all this blows over the poor dog will get a loving home as that is the real issue here. I don't think Ellen should have cried on TV in front of the world. I think she has a great personality but seems like she is using her influences to try to get what she wants after she broke the rule.

andrea, syracuse, ny

Ellen has a custom and practice of adopting animals and abruptly returning them for the most trifling reasons.

Small children injure small puppies. They don't mean to but they do. The policy is largely a good one for the benefit of the animals.

Ellen should think twice before she starts up with another mess like this.

Carl Zanolli, San Diego, California USA

She apologized more than once, she said I'm sorry. She is not the person being the bully to Mutts and Moms, others were the sassy ones. Mutts and Moms is taking it out on the two little girls and the dog. I think we call that misguided Anger. Sometimes it is ok to bend a rule, instead of being Anal retentive. And I love that they call themselves Mutts and Moms. The Moms part has obviously forgotten about the feelings of the children.

Eppy, Lake Geneva,

Ellen,



I am totally disguised and appalled at your local Rescue What is wrong with them? Are they trying to make an EXAMPLE out of you b/c of who you are. Give me a break. I would have done the same thing. I personally would’ve been afraid that if I indeed returned the dog to them that there was a chance that no one may adopt the dog and hence, be put to sleep. What a horrible scar this has left on the face of that organization. I do realize that they do need to protect the animals, but who are they protecting them from in this case? I only hope this doesn’t deter any potential adopters from adopting.

I have been a fan of yours forever, just never had the chance to write b/4, but I want you to know what an inspiration you are. When you had the guts to "come out" on your sitcom, they treated you horribly -end of story. Then "Will and Grace" came on and what a hit. What did I miss here. Long & short, I love and will support you always, my husband loves you too

Maria Hunter, Hanover Twp, Luzerne/PA

Ellen and Portia, You did what you felt was right. Hopefully this whole situation will settle down soon , and "they" will realize that you gave Iggy to a loving and caring family who truely deserves him. Shame on them for what they are putting Iggy, you, Portia and this family through! Shame on THEM!! You did nothing wrong. If this is how they run a business...don't worry they won't be around for long. Please hang in there...everything will work it self out. Good things happen to those who wait...especially when they are good "people" like you! We love you here in Baltimore, MD. Take care, Chris Locke 21234

Christina Locke, baltimore, MD

More than one hundred responses to this non-story! Are you all mad? It's a celebrity and a dog, for goodness sake!

Margot, Toronto, Canada

Ellen, you are wrong, wrong, wrong. When you don't want to live up to something, it's "just a piece of paper," but if you want someone else to live up to it, it's "I've got a signed contract here."

Knock off the crocodile tears, friend, and have your hairstylist apply to get a dog just like anyone else would have to.

Bianca, Alexandria, VA

It's stupid for the media to bring up Ellen coming out with her being a lesbian in 1977, what does that really have to do with this heart felt plea???? The Mutts and Moms owner's should not have made such a big deal over such a well thought out decision on Ellen's part. Afterall, Ellen DID purchase the dog and that clause should be removed from the contract... I can understand IF someone passed on a dog to someone who wasn't responsible to keep and care for an animal, but in Ellen's case this family clearly was able and willing to LOVE and care for Iggy! It's about getting the DOG a Good home, NOT about WHO Ellen DeGeneres is OR HOW she responded to such a awful situation... IT is Batkis NOT DeGeneres that has BLOWN this WAY out of hand and it is BATKIS that should be ASHAMED of HERSELF!!!!!! If anything all this SHOWS Ellen is a very CARING, GENUINE and RESPONSIBLE person who truly had Iggy's welfare at heart!

Kathleen M. Kitchens, Waynesboro, USA - Georgia

I have 2 wonderful cats, one of which I got from an animal rescue shelter. I think they are great or I wouldn't have my precious Blossom. The problem with situation is the fact that Ellen is a celebrity. If it had been me or you, this wouldn't have happened. I don't think what she did was wrong. It's much better than taking it to the pound or even worse, just giving it away to just anyone. The one problem I see with rescue shelters are that they have so many animals. My cat, Blossom, was sick when we got her. She had giardia. She almost died. I had to spend $300 on her not even 2 weeks after I got her. Not that I regret it but she was suppose to be healthy. I didn't really have to og through any backround check but maybe it was because I had my other cat with me taking her to a shot visit. Who knows. The shelter should be ashamed of themselves for taking an animal out of a perfectly good home.

Barbara, Smyrna, TN

She was stupid to get the dog in the first place, if she wasn't going to keep it. When you adopt a dog it is a COMMITMENT.

Petrina, Buffalo, NY

Ellen was upset because the children were upset about the dog being taken away. She was admitting she was wrong, and felt guilty for hurting the children, who had bonded to the dog.

One of the nice things about Ellen is her emotional tie with children..which is always shown in her encounters with them.
She cares. So does the agency.

I only have one problem with this, I do think many children under 14 have the ability to take care of a dog, with supervision.

Ellen was wrong for not paying attention to rules...but of all the celebrity wrongs that do go on, I don't think this was the worst one. But, it was not a good one.

reza, chicago, Il USA

Dear Ellen,
I have a Brussels Griffon. She will be 4 on Oct. 27th. Unfortunatly I am the only one in my family that loves her. I can't stand the pressure to constantly give her up. If I know that she is going into a family that would really love her would your friend , the hairdresser, like to have her? She is well trained and so needy for love.
I hope that I can help.
Sincerely,
Alisa Jacob
Alisajacob@gmail.com

alisa jacob, miami, florida

I don't think it is right for a public figure to use their show as a platform to get their way. I understand the heartbreak Ellen is feeling. I would be heartbroken, too. I just think that she shouldn't have aired her dirty laundry on TV. Celebrities are always complaining that they want to be left alone... unless its for their own good. This is just propagating the celebrity obsessed society we are surrounded by.

Lyndsay, Sacramento, CA

Shame on you Ellen!! You have singlehandedly done more to harm the rescue community using your show as a soapbox than any other human being. And why? Because you think you are above the law, above the need to honor a contract. You have deemed that you are the person to