Win tickets to the ultimate village fete with welly wanging and more
Friday night in Beijing’s chic new Tofu House. On a TV screen suspended from the ceiling of the otherwise elegant restaurant, four beautiful, baby-faced heart-throbs are being lowered onto a stage, dressed in red vinyl bodysuits with silver breastplates. Flames shoot from the floor as the boys burst into song. Before them sits a panel of three judges, two expressionless men, and a woman in a foot-high, pink, feathered hat and earrings so enormous they hang almost to her shoulders. She is laughing and dancing in her seat, along with thousands of live studio audience members, who scream and leap up and down to a medley of Chinese pop hits. Then the first of the night’s solos happens, a Taiwanese number accompanied by a martial-arts dance. The second song, a screaming rock track, features Peking Opera moves; the third is a ballad, during which a screen flashes schizophrenic images ranging from ancient Chinese calligraphy to an American dollar bill. Finally, there is a surreal rendition of All I Care About from the musical Chicago, complete with a Chinese Richard Gere and high-kicking Roxy Hart.
This is China’s primetime reality-TV favourite: Happy Boys Voice, known in casual English to everyone in China as Super Boy. I have been watching it nightly at the Tofu House; mine is a front-row view of China’s most recent modern offering, this unlikely love child of socialist propaganda and X Factor cheesiness.
The singer of All I Care About turns, lips quivering, to face the judges, a recording-industry executive, a pinched dour older man, and Yang Erche Namu, the pink-plumed, giant-earringed judge who has upstaged everyone on the show and captured either the heart or wrath of hundreds of millions of Chinese viewers. During tonight’s show, she mysteriously shouts: “Could I wear such earrings with a fake ear? I think not!”
I turn to Coco, the dazzling 33-year-old owner of the Tofu House. “What does she mean ‘fake ear’?” I ask. Coco shrugs: “She’s insane. I can’t stand her. I mean, look at her clothes!”
Coco is waiting for the judges to decide the fate of her favourite contestant. They describe his routine as “lacking real emotion” and him as “tonight’s loser”. His cheekbones glisten with tears. In a matter of moments, he will be voted off and everyone will sob, including Yang Erche Namu, the studio audience, and the Tofu House crew. “I loved the cute xiao bai lian,” says Coco of the just-eliminated “little white face” or baby-faced contestant. Coco is quite baby-faced herself, wearing a patchwork boho skirt and black slippers trimmed with green lace. Less vocal, but equally tuned in, are Taylor, a Tofu House manager so good-looking he’s worthy of Super Boy status himself, and Jake, a basketball fan who dresses in Levi’s and Adidas. Little Cun, the maid, is tidying, her eyes on the screen, and Cecilia, Coco’s assistant, rushes about answering the phone, serving tofu rolls, and trying to make it back to the TV without missing anything.
The last time I was intimately acquainted with Chinese TV was a decade ago. I had moved to Beijing to do an ill-fitting corporate job when I accidentally became a beneficiary of China’s equal-opportunity celebrity-making. At a party, a Chinese furniture salesman said: “You’re white; do you want to be in my friend’s soap opera?” Just like that, I was cast in Foreign Babes in Beijing.
Foreign Babes was standard for its day; a stylised TV drama with no real pretence of “reality”. It featured two American girls who “dared to love and dared to hate” Chinese studs. One girl was “good” and the other “bad”; I played the bad one. Ten years ago, western babes seducing local guys on TV seemed modern and racy, especially compared to other dreary state-run TV. Beijingers loved the bad girl, not only for her commitment to Chinese men, but also for her bravado, libido and American style. The show carried the delicate pretence of a socialist message – foreign imports are corrupting – but was actually an ad for liberated lifestyles.
In this respect, it was identical to all other moneymaking gimmicks that walk the razor’s edge between compliance and entertainment, including Super Boy. A sequel to Hunan TV’s unparalleled hit of 2005 and 2006, Mongolian Cow Sour Yoghurt Super Girl Voice contest (known widely as Super Girl), the all-male singing competition has attracted hundreds of millions of fans. Super Girl was filled with screaming, dancing, high stakes and humiliation of the X Factor and American Idol variety; the show’s finale was watched by 400m viewers, and its most recent winner, Li Yuchun, is a national celebrity and recording artist. Her adorable, androgynous face is almost as well known in China as Chairman Mao’s. She is China’s Idol, a “democratically” TV-made celebrity. And while she may seem to be living the western celebrity dream, the struggle of contestants here embodies a particularly Chinese paradox: escaping anonymity in a country of more than 1.3 billion people by becoming part of a new global public.
Super Boy looks, on the surface, surprisingly like the latest western youth culture obsession. Yet, lest it comes too close to “westernness”, its behind-the-scenes footage is as culturally specific as the producers can make it: super boys eating fish cheeks at banquets, dancing with finalists from Super Girl, and stir-frying. One memorable sequence involves a boy in a fruit-print apron in his parents’ kitchen, peeling skin off raw chicken legs and serving a home-cooked dish to weeping fans. That’s not a scene you’d see on X Factor.
China’s first reality TV hit, Extremely 6+1, which premiered in 2004, was a more watery imitation of X Factor and American Idol. Even then, reality TV in China was partially imitative of western reality TV and partially a Chinese reflection of the reforming youth struggle to achieve individual distinction (and wealth). A more Maoist proletariat vision than Super Girl or Super Boy, Extremely 6+1 featured contestants from four to 70 who underwent six days of vocal and dance training before performing on the seventh day. Then the audience voted for people it especially liked, but there were no winners or losers, just communally adored participants.
Later that year, Super Girl popularised actual audience “voting”. When its first winner sold over a million albums, the power of the show to create a star was clear. Equally obvious was its ability to fill the coffers of a struggling provincial TV broadcaster. Whether Super Girl would help produce a sound society or filter out unsavoury western cultural pollutants was less apparent.
That uncertainty triggered an official backlash, even as Super Girl’s popularity inspired hundreds of millions of fans, several blockbusting stars, and spin-offs. Severe official criticism of Super Girl accused the show of “promoting vulgarity” and, by providing examples of instant and easy celebrity, discouraging youngsters from living life practically, with realistic expectations. Liu Zhongde, the former culture minister, demanded a ban on all reality TV. But it didn’t happen. Super Girl fans multiplied, and in TV stations, producers argued for more reality TV, in exchange for closer collaborations with regulators.
China’s State Administration of Radio, Film, and Television (SARFT) conjured up a hefty list of guidelines for Super Boy. Officials demanded the sequel to Super Girl not include the word “Super” in its title. Chaoji, which means “in a class exceeding all others”, is the same “super” in Superman, perhaps too closely connected to the American hero, perhaps suggestive of too great a reach above the masses. Of course, the guidelines don’t mention English, so while the show is called Happy Boys Voice in Chinese, it’s conveniently translated and discussed in English as Super Boy.
SARFT also forbade “gossip about the contestants”, or “scenes of fans screaming and wailing”, or “losing contestants in tears”. It was to “maintain a happy atmosphere”, and include only “healthy and ethically inspiring songs”. There would be no “scandal-dogged” judges, and no mockery of contestants. In fact, SARFT insisted on overseeing everything from “language and manners,” to outfits and accessories, to maintain “mainstream values” and avoid “weirdness, vulgarity or low taste”.
The show is an example of the increasing impracticality of SARFT’s censorious process in today’s China, a place where reality includes the economic imperatives of provincial TV producers. Super Boy resolutely carries the temptation of its predecessor Super Girl: the very heart of the appeal to the audience, and the revenue for the producers, is the magical bridge between the ordinary and the super, between everyday Chinese guys and newly minted celebrity idols.
There are, of course, gestures of concession to the censors, including the chicken-leg peeling scene, and even more uplifting moments, including wet-eyed interviews about patriotic events such as Hong Kong’s return to Chinese rule. Though most contestants noted they had been under 10, all were “changed for ever” by the end of British rule over China’s cherished Hong Kong. Overall, such imperfectly blended moments of correctness and entertainment present a mixed message about the intersection between what’s modern and what’s moral.
Every week a “super boy” is eliminated; judged, “juried” and voted off. Voting is done by text; the pay-to-vote system is more about revenue than voting. And, in much the same way as the voting on American Idol and X Factor is meant to be an imitation of the “free” voting westerners enjoy during elections, so the voting on Super Boy reflects a system in which votes are not definitive, because the actual selection process is complex. On Super Boy, judges’ votes, those cast by “randomly selected commoners”, and choices made by previously eliminated contestants, really determine the outcome. And yet people send in millions of messages. Each vote posts a one-yuan (6p) charge to the voter’s mobile-phone bill, so the ability to vote is tied to economic privilege. Sixty per cent of the cost (6 mao) goes to Hunan TV and 40% (4 mao) to the state-owned phone company. Multiply that by 400m, and it’s an irresistible recipe for making money.
There are, of course, more earnest interpretations of its success. According to the director Long Dan Ni, it’s their love of “truth” that keeps the audience voting. “Truth is my strategy,” she says. “I want the audience to know everything about each boy, even if he’s from a rural, poor family, and everything about his personality, even his worst qualities. The singing is just a show. The audience loves reality.”
Or perhaps the audience just wants to take part in creating a celebrity. The joy of watching commoners rise from poverty is not specific to the West. In the Tang dynasty Story of Miss Li, the protagonist Scholar Zhang transforms from an impoverished social parasite to a rich, famous singer. After losing his fortune to a prostitute, he reclaims it by singing at a contest held by funeral directors. “Before he had finished the first verse, all who heard were sobbing…” What’s poignant is not only that Zhang, an ordinary loser, becomes a “super boy”, but also that fortune itself is volatile and easily reversible, a truth perhaps never felt as keenly in China as in the past 20 years, during which vast fortunes have been made and lost.
Super Boy promises to make and break the fortunes of ordinary boys, and flaunt an endless supply of what audiences love and censors claim to hate: gossiping, dirty dancing, and wailing. Perhaps because Super Boy is live, it’s impossible for censors to control the shots, scandals, or tears. Or maybe they just don’t actually want to. In either case, the show’s quotient of weirdness, controversy and hot drama is obscenely high.
Yang Erche Namu is somehow both a predictable and unimaginable candidate for playing the part of China’s Paula Abdul (the American Idol judge who is a constant source of gossip). She is a model of the conflict between what audiences want to watch and what Chinese censors claim to want to conceal. And her reputation is for being more “scandal-dogged” than Paula and meaner than Simon Cowell. Already famous for her kiss-and-tell books and an English-language memoir, Leaving Mother Lake, she grew up on the border of China and Tibet, at Lugu Lake, among Mosuo women, a matrilineal society that practises female polygamy. Her mother’s advice to Namu was that good sex means good skin, and if she didn’t want zits she’d have to take a lover. It worked. The once-barefoot goat herder spent the better part of her twenties as a model, singer and celebrity. She attracted international media attention in the 1990s after the publication of Leaving Mother Lake. Now in her early forties, she runs a guest house and museum in Lugu Lake, and is the most famous and reviled judge on Super Boy.
I track Namu down in Beijing, and she tells me to meet her at a hair salon called Eric’s of Paris, that she is leaving the following day for Shanghai for “some romantic dating”, and must have her hair done.
An hour after I arrive, Namu climbs the stairs. She is Amazon tall, with her signature straight-black hair parted in the middle and hanging like drapes on either side, covering a huge percentage of her wide, lovely face. She carries a huge gold bag that matches strappy gold stilettos on her French-manicured feet. Everyone stares.
She shakes my hand and tells me she now has no time to do her hair, so we go to a cafe next door, where Chinese guys smoke and type, and fashionably dressed women sip lattes. Namu orders black coffee and shakes her incredible hair. “Look at this,” she says, and pulls out a purple silk pouch, in which is a carefully folded hot-pink Chinese jacket. “This was 4,000 RMB,” she offer (over £250). “But I had to get it. I have to wear something new and exciting every week, even though I have to spoon-feed them my colours. They hate colour.” By they, she means SARFT, whom she compares at every opportunity with Hunan TV’s producers, who celebrate her costumes and controversies.
Namu launches into the story of the huge feather hat that Hunan TV now features in a promo. After she wore it, “they” called her to say it looked like a “chicken nest”, and that she had to “rest” for a week and not appear on the show (Super Boy has an arsenal of five judges it rotates). Namu shows me her mobile phone inbox, messages from the Beijing officials directing her not to appear for a week, and then dozens from Hunan TV about how fabulous the hat looked. Her female fans have sent messages, too: “Won’t you be there next week? The show is only beautiful when you’re on.”
“See! My fans love that hat. A chicken nest! I wore that hat to Gay Pride in Switzerland, and I was on TV six times. In 1999 I won the best-dressed woman in China. Before Super Boy I was the most talented, the best dressed, a Mosuo princess, cultural ambassador and the best writer in China. Now everyone hates me.”
Namu, perhaps oversimplifying, attributes the animosity to her visibility, and to Chinese men.
“Chinese men have always hated me,” she says. “I make them feel like nothing. They’re closed and I’m open. I say the truth.”
In fact, her bad rap comes in part from her performance on the show, and in part from her reputation for liberated sex, lurid books and criticisms of Chinese men. She won’t consider marrying a Chinese man; westerners, she tells me conspiratorially, are “more romantic”. The subject of Chinese women dating anyone other than Chinese men is a fraught one in China. The reasons for this range from historical resentment over barbarian invasions to the gender imbalance in China’s population and concern over the dwindling number of marriageable Chinese women. Namu, by publicly taking herself out of the running, is a PR agent for western men and potentially a terrifying role model.
“Chinese women love me,” she says. “Women here are independent, strong and stylish. The men can’t compete; they’re repressed and think everything is dirty. When I told one ‘super boy’ he should come to Lugu Lake, everyone misinterpreted it. His singing was beautiful, and singing in my minority culture is a natural practice, so he should come to my home town.”
She does not mention that singing in Mosuo culture is famously used for courtship and seduction. Her comment was seen as an invitation to spend time with her at home. One of the male judges famously said to a contestant who had just sung about dreaming of his love by a river: “If the river is Lugu Lake, your dream is a nightmare.”
Namu developed her reputation for being what she refers to as “the biggest bitch in China” early in the show. Three judges, who then included a celebrity-guest rock star called Zheng Jun, set about turning 100,000 potential “super boys” into 50, and Namu kicked contestants off the audition stage with stunning speed.
“Everyone criticised me for only letting stupid contestants sing three words. But I was giving them face by listening at all. We had to audition thousands! So I kicked off 61 bad ones per hour.”
When Namu and Zheng argued over who should be awarded golden tickets in his home city Xi’an, she made her first 8m enemies by kicking off his favourite. Zheng stormed off.
To the delight of Hunan TV, SARFT’s horror, and the fury of Xi’an, the spat was televised.
“On my flight back to Beijing, everyone was glaring,” Namu says. “I thought I had on too much make-up, or my dress was too low-cut. Then a flight attendant gave me a newspaper. It said three terrible things about me: I only care about people’s looks; never let anyone sing more than three words; and speak English all the time.” She denies all three. “I care what is in people’s hearts! But the guy who Zheng Jun picked the first day had a huge pimple on his lip and his eyes were red. And I don’t speak English. I just correct people’s stupid English when they sing their English songs.”
Namu partially blames Lugu Lake for the flak. Having spent the past four years there, she was unprepared to face the publicity and meanness that awaited her in the capital. She returned because her “body needed some papaya juice and dating”. When Hunan TV called to ask if she would help judge Super Boy, she said “of course”, and within weeks her reputation had soured.
As to why she said “of course” to doing the show, Namu puts it simply, batting her lashes.
“I needed pocket money for coffee on my next trip to the south of France.”
Why Hunan TV asked her to star is also easy to guess. They knew she would elicit every kind of reaction possible: outrage, delight, controversy, and tabloid attention. The latest rumour is that a jealous western man hacked off Namu’s right ear and now she wears a fake one. She shows me her ear, intact, and says this is why she wears 5lb earrings: they are proof that she has real ears.
The director Long Dan Ni loves working with her. “Namu is adorable. She has her own unique personality; Namu is a very real Namu. My directorial vision is about truth; I want everyone to show his or her own personality and hide nothing. That’s just what Namu does.”
In spite of this loving defence, and Namu’s apparent delight at celebrity, she claims to be exhausted by all the scorn. “I’m a second Jiang Qing,” she concludes, comparing herself to Chairman Mao’s famously villainised second wife, sentenced to death for her participation in the Cultural Revolution. “Now the media has covered me in this unfair way, I can understand how the Cultural Revolution started. But I am lucky to have been born in the right time, because I have western friends. I can escape the Chinese community – I have two worlds.”
Perhaps because I belong to the western one, Namu ends our interview in a joyful mood, suggesting I help get her a job on American Idol next season, after she finishes judging a Chinese reality-TV beauty contest slated to air in autumn.
In China, the power of the media to convey messages is well understood. But with the country’s staggering pace of change, TV’s moral messages have been shrunk to fit the political exigencies of each new moment. Chinese TV is the site where the slogan-speak of the country’s past meets the advertising language of its present. Censors still require the presence of some moral messages, but they are increasingly permissive of injections of those messages into commercial content. According to The Wall Street Journal, China is launching a new reality-TV show, Soccer Prince, backed by Chinese and western companies, including the producers of American Idol.
Sheldon Lu, a professor of comparative literature at the University of California, Davis, and the author of Chinese Modernity and Global Biopolitics, says the appetite for reality TV is driven by an increasingly diversified audience. Historical reenactments of Qing dynasty dramas cater to Lu’s generation, while reality TV is “the story of the younger generation”.
“My mother wouldn’t like reality TV; she likes Years of Burning Passion,” he says, referring to a hit drama of 2002 about a revolutionary Chinese general and his family. “Super Boy is a good example of the American influence on the younger generation, and maybe it is the future of China. There are a lot of good things to say about American public culture, but this kind of show is not the only direction for the future of China. It’s a one-sided representation of what life should be.”
On Friday night’s show, the finalists are lovelier than ever, each with a glitter-caked celebrity on his arm. The Tofu House audience is mesmerised. After three hours, everyone grabs mobile phones and begins frantically texting. The boy with too few votes stands above his losing number, collects himself, and makes an Academy Award-worthy speech. He apologises to his parents, promising the loss will motivate him to work harder so he can help his impoverished village. Then he slinks away, leaving the winner to ascend to superhero heights.
“At least he’s not too short,” Coco says of China’s first crowned Super Boy. I ask what qualities, other than baby-faces and height, matter. The conversation is heated; some consider “uniqueness” a requirement, but Coco argues it should never trump good looks or talent.
“Who was that crazy guy on American Idol – the Chinese one, the terrible singer?” she asks, meaning William Hung, the notorious contestant who sang so badly he made a name for himself. “William Hung really lost face for Chinese people. And he was ‘unique’. Nobody should sink to such lows for celebrity.”
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Times Exclusive Tickets £25

2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
F/1989
£36,000
Hollingworth At Ombersley
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
90K plus bonus plus options
Confidential
London
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
£40,000 - £50,000 + benefits
Lloyds Pharmacy
Coventry
£38k
Barclaycard
Various Locations
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.