Caitlin Moran
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition

We love Gene Hunt. That’s just a fact. As soon as Life on Mars broadcast, Hunt become that rare thing, in these creatively timid and threadbare days for British drama: an instant icon. The first since Anna chopping out lines of coke in This Life, perhaps, or Mr Darcy and his big wet nightie.
Let’s face it – he’s why Ashes to Ashes has been made. Neither we nor, more importantly, the BBC, could let him go quite yet. Even though Sam Tyler jumped off the rooftop in Life on Mars, and ended his coma-version of 1973, the idea of bringing Gene back was too irresistible.
A five-minute perusal of the David Bowie back-catalogue revealed a loophole in the lyrics to Ashes to Ashes (“Do you remember a guy. . . from an early song?”) and, well, here’s Gene again, now in 1981. And this time playing opposite a Sexy Lady Cop time-traveller (Keeley Hawes), so that Hunt can extend his repertoire of drinking, smoking, swearing and fighting to include chat-up and fornication, too.
Personally, I am, in theory, pro a spin-off to Life on Mars. I can’t understand people who go “Oh it’s a bit silly. A bit too much.”
Come on! Once you’ve invented a time-travelling copper living in Camberwick Green, suddenly shifting it to 1981 and putting that bird from Spooks in it is neither here nor there. You can set it during the Reformation and cast Dev from Corriein it for all it would stretch my credulity envelope. BRING IT ON!
Alas, however, on watching Ashes to Ashes, it’s quite clear that my envelope is far more tender than I had presumed. It’s no longer depressing, threatening Seventies Manchester, but bright, brash Eighties London, and – in 200 miles, eight years and one sequel – Gene has gone from being a complex antihero to a cartoon hero.
It’s not Phil Glenister’s fault – he continues to play Hunt with malicious, controlled glee. The problem is with the show itself. It has lost its innocence. It’s gone from being a little bit in love with Hunt – as any rational programme would be – to borderline stalking him. Every Hunt entrance is a “Hero Shot” – slow pans, moody lighting, orchestral upswell. Every scene is waiting for Hunt to enter, or animate, or conclude it. The show will give him anything he wants – machineguns, a speedboat, a ludicrous plot resolution.
Most crucially and, I think, eventually fatally, Hunt’s just not being serviced with the kind of dialogue he should be getting. On The Thick of It, Armando Iannucci and Jesse Armstrong employ a third writer, solely to come up with imaginative swearing for the Alastair Campbell figure (“Wake up and smell the c*ck!”) For Ashes to Ashes, Hunt sorely needs an equivalent specialist in sexist, racist, homophobic northern alpha-male dialogue. His epithet for the posh Alex Drake (Hawes) – “Bollinger knickers” – is as close to sparky as it gets; and while the much-vaunted sexual tension between them works, you feel their eventual shag will be a hollow victory, given how poor the preceding chat-up lines have been. In episode one, in his opening speech, he’s already using dialogue (“armed bastards”) that he has used before. A Gene Hunt greatest hits package, so soon? It’s inexplicable laziness.
While, in the event, the new time-travelling cop, Keeley Hawes, more than holds her own – she does the old “on her knees in front of a television weeping ‘Talk to me!’ ” thing like a trouper – it scarcely matters, because the clown ruins everything in the end. Oh God, the clown. The pierrot from David Bowie’s Ashes to Ashes video fills the role the “spooky Test Card girl” provided in Life on Marsand, so far, stands as the most mortifying thing to happen on TV in 2008. Although it has tough competition from various cast members having to sing, deadpan, the lyrics to Ashes to Ashes at crucial moments.
You do wonder why on earth – after the first, excited script-meeting in the pub – they insisted on calling it Ashes to Ashes.Naming it anything else would have made it unnecessary to crowbar in a) the singing of chart hits during an armed siege and b) a malignant shouting Bowie clown – scarcely two of the easiest briefs within a serious drama.
On this showing, Gene Hunt – tragically – isn’t going to make it to the 1990s, and Hello Spaceboy.
Ashes to Ashes, Thur, BBC One, 9pm
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Can anyone tell what Keeley Hawes is saying and does anyone really talk like that in real life. Ashes to Ashes has to be endured now rather than enjoyed
jill williams, sheffield,
I think Ashes to Ashes is fantastic, and have found myself loving it even more then I did Life On Mars, which I convinced myself would never happen.
The combination of Gene and Alex is a winner, and the series just got better and better as time went on;the finale was brilliant. Bring on series 2!
Izzy D, Norwich,
Personally I was worried about this series, being such a huge fan of Life on Mars but its getting better and better. The 80's were a "ugly " era, clothing etc and the harshness of the lighting and scenes really works. Plus Keeley Hawes is really good, especially considering the shoes she had to fill
Julieanne Stephens, Wellington, New Zealand
lazy,over the top,dumbing down of characters and scripts, characters are cartoon like now. There is no plausability in script. no need to have the main character looking like a sex symbol. cheap way to boost viewing. appaling over the top acting . no empathy for main character alex. no 80s feel.
vanda, leeds,
I'd be interested to hear what you think of it now we've had five episodes, it's sheer brilliance! Briliant acting, perfect timing and marvellous writing - very rare these days.
Sally, Bicester, Oxfordshire, UK
The point is though that it is set in the Eighties - flash, tack, over the top - never subtle. Everything has to represent that. Stick with it!
Pucci , London,
"Every Hunt entrance is a âHero Shotâ â slow pans, moody lighting, orchestral upswell. Every scene is waiting for Hunt to enter, or animate, or conclude it. The show will give him anything he wants â machineguns, a speedboat, a ludicrous plot resolution."
See, I think you're missing something here... people love Gene Hunt because they want to be like him. Come on, we don't want to hang around with Gene; he'd take sarcastic potshots at all of us, because that's what he's like. We want to be Gene Hunt; we want to say whatever *we* want and damn well get away with it.
Assuming that's true, WE (by proxy) are the ones getting the dramatic music, speedboats, and all that awesome action-hero carte blanche. And I think that could make this series very, very popular.
Fawnet, Seattle, W\a
Hmmm... an A-Team type shoot out to remind us we are supposed to be in the 80s? Not impressed. Must do better than this.
Ozky Puduk, London,
I thoroughly enjoyed the first episode of Ashes to Ashes for a number of reasons. I prefer the idea of the 1980s to the 1970s ( programmes either about the 1970s or set in the 1970s really depress me), and I would rather look at Keeley Hawes than the actor who played Sam Tyler. Great fun.
Caesar, London,
I agree Hunt has become a cartoon character. And so has lost his power to challenge us with non-PC but effective logic. What this first episode shows is just how difficult it is to get the right mixture of tension, humour, surprise, spine-tingling moments, etc. Life on Mars did it, I think, because the central premise was strong, even if we didn't fully understand it. Sam's desire to get back to his own time was completely identifiable. But with Ashes to Ashes, there is just too much already known about the mystery of the main character's being where she shouldn't be - not just by the viewers but by her too. Which means, fatally, the premise has become more pantomime than real, and with it the plot has deflated like a popped irony balloon. With it, all sorts of silliness has taken over. Like Chris being just a few yards away from a row of men all firing at him, including with two machine guns, for a long time; him hopping about like Bugs Bunny and not getting hit once! Come on . . .
Jenny Morientes, London,
Margaret = If you haven't watched Life on Mars how can you judge how well Ashes to Ashes exceeds it? You can't judge the little parts you got bored of with Life on Mars with the one series you saw of Ashes to Ashes.
And the re-run you saw of Life on Mars was the final episode, try watching it from beginning to end (don't just watched random episodes), it's a great series.
Rosalyn, Bolton, UK
I can't say I understood all that was said by Caitlin Moran but I don't agree with her conclusion. I watched some of the previous series Life on Mars but got bored. After watching Phil Glenister's marvellous performance in Cranford recently, I thought I'd give Ashes to Ashes a try. I thought it was excellent and I'm really looking forward to Episode 2.. On switching over at the end of Episode 1 to watch a re-run of Life on Mars (10mins only - got boread again), I think Ashes to Ashes exceeds it and long may it run!
Margaret Logan-Jones , Biggleswade,