Dan Sabbagh
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
Chris Moyles and Jeremy Paxman should have their salaries reviewed, but the millions earned by Jonathan Ross and Graham Norton from the BBC are justified, a report into presenters' pay concluded yesterday.
A landmark inquiry into stars' salaries, led by the BBC's regulator, concluded that the £18 million, three-year deal with Ross was fair because ITV and Channel 4 compete regularly for top entertainers. However, the BBC Trust questioned whether Paxman's £1 million a year, or the £630,000 paid to Moyles for his Radio 1 breakfast show, could be justified because there were was insufficent competition from commercial broadcast news or commercial radio.
The overall message — to the surprise of rival broadcasters and opposition politicans — was that the BBC was “not negatively distorting” stars' pay by bidding up rates.
The published version of the 140-page analysis, conducted for the BBC Trust by the economists Oliver & Ohlbaum, had the exact pay figures for the top 100 TV stars removed.
Sir Michael Lyons, Chairman of the BBC Trust, said that he “did not want the BBC to become a no-go zone for top talent”. He added that “many, many licence-fee payers value some of the most expensive performers” on BBC television. Sir Michael also refused to be drawn on whether he would reject another £18 million deal for Ross, and in doing so effectively endorsed future inflation-busting rises for top performers. Norton is believed to earn £2.5 million a year, while Gary Lineker earns £1.5 million.
Jeremy Hunt, the Shadow Culture Secretary, said that the BBC Trust had “completely missed the point”. He said: “Jonathan Ross may well be worth £18 million on the open market. The question is whether the BBC should be paying for this with licence- fee payers' money when commercial broadcasters would be more than willing to pay it at no cost to the public.”
One of the few figures that the report did reveal was that inflation for all “talent”, including presenters and actors, was running at 6.1 per cent, faster than the annual increase in the BBC's internal budget. The BBC spent £242 million on talent, £204 million of which came out of the licence fee — or £8.16 per licence-fee payer.
Sir Michael did concede that radio was different, where the BBC dominates a struggling commercial sector that is largely composed of local radio stations. “Some of the salaries would not be paid by commercial radio at the moment,” the chairman said, after Oliver & Ohlbaum recommended “appropriate price setting” when it comes to pay. Pay in radio will be reviewed over the next 12 months.
Sir Terry Wogan, the presenter of Britain's most listened-to breakfast programme on Radio 2, earns £800,000, according to information leaked from the broadcaster two years ago, while Chris Evans is paid £540,000 for his Radio 2 drivetime show.
Andrew Harrison, the chief executive of RadioCentre, the radio industry lobby group, complained that the BBC was not making any moves to make its pay policy more transparent. He said: “The BBC Trust report outlines that BBC pays more for its top talent than commercial radio — confirming the issue we have been flagging for some while. However, the actions proposed by the trust to address this, while helpful, do not go nearly far enough.”
Problems were also highlighted with the amount of money paid to some BBC news presenters and journalists. Sir Michael said that “the BBC's role in news is so distinctive that we want a review”, after the report prepared for the trust made it clear that, in all but a handful of cases, BBC news programes such as Newsnight, presented by Paxman, or Today, the home of John Humphrys, faced no competition.
Neither criticism was accepted by the BBC. It said that “top news talent was increasingly work across multiple genres” — referring, for example, to the newscaster Fiona Bruce taking on Antiques Roadshow. In radio the BBC said that competition was “not just between the BBC and commercial radio, but across the entire entertainment industry” — implying that top presenters could get lucrative work on screen instead of on the airwaves.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
These useless individuals may be PAID ludicrously large sums of money, but not one of them actually EARNS it.
When one of them invents a cure for cancer, perhaps I'll change my view, but what's so difficult about making abusive foul-mouthed comments to, or about, another person?
Astaroth, Cumbria,
Ross is vastly overpaid! Paxman has a serious job and is good value for money. Get rid of Ross and his smarmy quips . He can't interview females without reverting to schoolboy sexual innuendo's.
Jack, Dudley,
Has someone transported us back to the 1950s? Jonathan Ross isnt employed for his diction and as a talk show host I believe he is expected to talk! He presents a different type of show to Paxman but both are watchable. Live and let live chaps!
Chris Jay, Whitchurch, Shropshire
Surely there is enough culture around the BBC could tap into instead of the foulmouthed idiots like Ross who are only interested in self promotion.He Ross cannot keep his mouth shut for longer that 5 seconds before he is at it again.
BBC should get rid of him and his ilk.
colin Beckett, Stourton, Warkshire
I find it easy to watch and listen to Jeremy Paxman anytime; especially if he's wringing the truth out of a politician. Jonathon Ross just rabbits on. He reminds me of the late Carman Miranda murdering the English language in a old Twentieth Fox forties musical.
Tony Cox, Liverpool, England
They are not in the commercial field whereby revenue is generated by viewers or listners tuning and purchasing what ever goods are being advertised or promoted.
The truth is that the BBC is in a cosy relationship with 'agents' and that it has become a money machine for the lucky few
Jim, Doncaster, UK
The BBC has a responsibility to develop programmes that contribute to the greater good of the population, that are educational, inspiring, factual and raise awareness of issues and how to deal with them.
The question isn't the market value but one of contribution to the above. Ross - No.
Michael, Cambridge,
Paxman on £1 million?! you'd think he'd be able to afford better underwear than Marks & Spencers!
Jimmy, London,
Hmm. So we value floppy-haired gobby blokes like Jonathon Ross more than experienced journalists like Jeremy Paxman, by a factor of 6. Or Jonathon Ross more than a teacher by a factor of 200? Funny old world.
Ricky, Bakewell, UK