Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

Tell us who you think should win at the foot of this article
Claire
by Tim Teeman
There are some things that cannot be taken back. After the episode of The Apprentice in which Claire and Alex teamed up to destabilise poor, decent, ex-Army Simon, I wrote that she was “evil dressed in Topshop sale rail”. The task was to set up a photographic studio at Bluewater shopping centre in Kent. Claire and Alex cackled behind Simon's back and then, in “the boardroom”, Claire viciously attacked Simon. Sir Alan told her that he didn't like people being victimised and sent her scurrying, unfired, from the boardoom, with a sentiment shared in living rooms across the nation: “I can't bear to look at you.”
From this moment, at least on the surface and for the purposes of prime-time entertainment, Claire has been a woman transformed. Sure, her motormouth hasn't abated - one of the interrogators at last week's interview task begged her to shut up - and she is still ruthless and competitive, but her sheer unpleasantness has been vaporised.
In the lexicon of reality shows, Claire has been on a “journey” and, from hating her, many Apprentice fans are cheering her to a well-deserved victory. She would be a good Apprentice and has been great entertainment. If she doesn't win, it will be down only to Sir Alan's penchant for a) choosing men over women and b) men in whom he sees “something of myself”. The great grumpy gnome has already made one absurd decision this series - chucking out the able and lovely Raef, seemingly just for being posh - and is legendary for throwing a wobbly with the finishing line in sight. How else would you explain choosing Michelle Dewberry over “The Badger”?
Claire should win for the most basic reason: she is the best candidate. Fellow contestant Jennifer, chiefly memorable for her mustard tops, accurately noted that Claire was “a Tasmanian devil”. She began the series by describing herself as like the family dog, barrelling around, smashing through windows. Later she said her inner Rottweiler was stirring. If she doesn't like something she scowls that fantastic hatchet-face and then powers on, like a ball-bearing.
Claire's instincts are right: in the tissue-advert task she knew her team should have got a shot of the product. She also knew that she should have made that dreadful environmental greetings card presentation, rather than “Little Britain” Kevin who menaced, rather than charmed, potential customers.
Claire has been garlanded with compliments about her sales technique and is one of the few candidates, alongside Lee, who is funny: she joked about getting married on the wedding-dress task and was disappointed when Alex wouldn't play her boyfriend in Marrakesh. Last week, she told the group that she could have snogged the face off one of her interviewers - the one that looked like a pug chewing a wasp.
When Claire scraps (often) she doesn't just scrap, as her female team-mates did, with other women. And she scraps only when she can see something going wrong. She may drive her colleagues mad but out of all the contestants who have absurdly sworn to give it “110 per cent”, only she really has. “Maybe I should have learnt to keep my gob shut from day one,” she has said. Yeah, but how dull that would have been. After weeks of drama and incident, who wants a bore, or even worse, an inadequate with a sob story, to win this best-ever series of The Apprentice?
Lee
by Andrew Billen
In the programme about the final five Apprentice candidates, it was explained in saddened tones that Lee McQueen had “entered adult life without a university degree”. That most people “enter adult life” without this handicap, and that even under present official ambitions only half of the nation's school leavers will do so, seemed not to have occurred to the graduate who wrote the script. But that Lee did not make it to college, may not have wished to, and would almost certainly have wasted everybody's time, including his own, had he done so is precisely why I hope he wins.
In an age of MBAs, year-long secondments to business “schools” and degrees in golf course management, Lee demonstrates what an extremely narrow skill set (as he might call it) is required to flourish in trade. Lee does not know the difference between “gender” and “genre” (as in “We was consciously appealing to the female genre”), spells “recognisable” so that it becomes unrecognisable (he additionally made three spelling mistakes in the word “tomorrow”), and thinks that “that” is pronounced with an initial “v”. His ignorance and lack of creativity are aspects of his strength; they leave his mind clear of everything but his drive and native cunning.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
There really is is a difference between gender and genre. The thing about the French is TOTALLY irrelevant.
Claire, Oxford,
Actually, Andrew Billen, there is no difference between gender and genre: the latter is the French word for the former.
Bill Baker, London,
There are 4 left because they're all equally 2nd rate. Remember the likes of James Max, Miriam Stalley etc? Several notches above.
raoul, London,
This is very well written, thank you.
Dej, London,
100% Claire. Alex in second place. Easy.
Chris, Harrogate,
Lee lied on his CV - what was he doing for the 2 years he said he was at College? Amazingly, nobody asked the question. Exaggerating one's CV is one thing, lying about it is another. I was amazed he wasn't fired.
Ian, Bristol,
Yawn. Lets shake things up. Stick them on an island. Let the BB wasters audition for Don Giovanni. Get the "Got Talent" delusionals out selling used bog-roll. Or: send each lot to its house, market etc. - in front of fake cameras. They can emerge after 6 weeks and wonder why nobody's heard of them.
joe, birmingham, uk
If suralan really wants to know if they are any good, he'd use something like makemeabettermanager.com to get the views of people who worked with them in a real environment - their colleagues from their last job.
Tony Canelloni, camberley,
I'd have to say Alex or Clare - on basis I think they'd be the easiest to get on with. Lee would irritate me like crazy and Helene seems lazy but that might just be the way it is edited. I couldn't help feeling sorry for her in the board room though.
Sonia Crawford, London, England
I think Sir Alan Sugar will be unable to decide on an outright winner and give the job to two of them on a trial basis in order to determine who he actually wants over a longer period of time- say six months or so.
James, Manchester,
I really hope Lee wins. Apart from being charming and honest, his appointment would blow a hole through the ridiculous 'grads req'd to clean loos' culture Tony Blair in his infinite wisdom has created.
Vai, Lee!
Roisin, Manchester,
With greatest respect to Kate from Southampton, Lucinda was a dingbat who had no place being in the show for as long as she was. Raef, on the other hand would have given great vfm on the interview show and I think should have gone all the way to the final where he would have been bested by .....Alex
Charles, Bristol,
I think some of my funds has shares in competitors of Amstrad's, so I think he should definitely employ all twelve (or however many) contestants who started the series.
Ian Kemmish, Biggleswade, UK
Yeah, I'm for Raef too, but too be honest I doubt Sugar could bear employing somebody obviously smarter than him. My instincts tell me either Alex or Claire will snatch it. I didn't know until last week that Lee was only semi-literate, but I wanted Helene to win anyway.
john, Taipei,
With editing, any of them could look good or bad. Once you accept it's all a set-up, it becomes entertaining.
That said, I'd hire none of them, they all seem incompetent backstabbers.
Arthur, Newcastle,
Then there were 4 Motor mouth Claire who can sell but that is all.Helene who has done nothing.Lee shot himslef in foot with CV. Here's to Alex. Only 24, a big opportunity. Go for it.!
J Evans, High Wycombe,
Claire to win! She's bright, quick and can look after herself. Alex is a pretty but bland whinger, Lee has shown his insecurities and would be out of his depth, and Helene (although she's grown on me) still hasn't shown any 'flashes of brilliance' as coined by the infamous not-so-good Jewish boy!
Jessica, London,
Sorry, what Times journos do not seem to be experts on is the subject of "Outstanding business talent". Strange to tell to them, obviously, is the fact that the ability to sell is not in itself sufficient for anything above shop-assistant level. Mouthy Claire is (as Sir Alan says) just noisy...
Catherine, Oxford, UK
Come on Helene!
Ella, Edinburgh,
It should have been Raef :(
Su, Birmingham, UK
I would like to see Lee win proving that you don't need a degree or a stupid job title to get noticed. He may have some rough edges but he can be moulded to fit into Sir Alan Sugar's organisation.
Overall, I think the quality of candidates has been pretty poor.
Paul, West Midlands,
Bruce Bannerman?
That's any amusing cross, Hulk alter ego and love rat.
JM, Leeds, UK
It's all about the thrill of the chase - the winner will disappear and work for one of Sir Alan's underlings
Chris Jay, Whitchurch, Shropshire
I still want Raef to win! I demand a recount. But if we have to choose one of these, I choose, uh, Claire or Alex. Don't ask why, I don't really know, myself.
Lucinda spent her whole time complaining about what she couldn't do, she never showed what she could do. Liked her hats though!
Kat, Dundee,
I'm sad! I care! Go Lee!
Nancy Wood, London,
All these reality shows are similar - great entertainment but who really cares about the end result? Whether it be a million pound record contract (in reality 1 hit single) or apprentice to Alan Sugar (in reality working with one of his underlings) its allabout the fun of the chase!
Chris Jay, Whitchurch, Shropshire
I would love to see some of the 20,000 that didn't make it. Little wonder that I now live in France. I feel sorry for Sir Alan. Not, I'm fairly sure, a sentiment that many will have had. The programme should be called, "Make a silk purse"
Mathew , Perpignan, France
Why, whatever the subject, is there always someone asking "do we care"? I would like to know why there are so many sad people who don't appear to care about anything, always asking the same sad question. I am interested enough to care, and I think Claire should win.
Edna Greenacre, Grimsby, England
Do any of them really deserve to be paid a hundred grand.... after watching each of them in action, as good an entertainment it may be, I can get 10 times a better candidate for half that amount of money.
D Jones, London, UK
I hope its Lee and silence all those people who bash him for not having a degree and different accent...
Sam, Manchester,
But Lucinda was gorgeous! Probably too capable to be the apprentice. Like Raef, she was courteous and at interview, was not humbled by the "august".
She knocked the rest of them into a cocked hat (perhaps that should be cocked beret).
leila, manchester, uk
"Who should win The Apprentice". are we really sad enough to care?
Marc, Paris, France
The Apprentice is shown in the UK. Why would someone in France care or want to care?!
My vote goes to Claire!
Michael Smith, Liverpool, UK
Lucinda was the real "one who got away". She could have been a nightmare for Sir Alan, but she could equally have been brilliant. He erred on the side of caution when he fired her, keeping on the four adequate but far-from-outstanding finalists. It was a shame he couldn't take a gamble.
Kate, Southampton, UK