Kevin Dowling
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
A Channel 4 documentary that argued that global warning was a fraud is to be criticised by the media regulator.
On Monday Ofcom is expected to publish a long-awaited report that upholds claims by some of the scientists who appeared in the programme last year that they were misrepresented.
The Great Global Warming Swindle, which aired in March last year, has been accused of downplaying the threat in the public mind. It sparked an outcry among environmentalists and many campaigners argue that the programme has contributed to people believing that the threat is not real.
It is understood that complaints by Carl Wunsch, a climate expert at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, will be upheld. The regulator is expected to say that Channel 4 should have told Dr Wunsch that the programme was going to be a polemic.
The regulator will also uphold complaints made by the government’s former chief scientist, Sir David King, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
But the broadcaster will not be censured over a second complaint about accuracy, which contained 131 specific points and ran to 270 pages, with Ofcom finding that it did not mislead the public.
Debate has raged since the programme was shown, with many scientists claiming that it misrepresented evidence about the threat of global warming and that it rehashed discredited arguments and skewed data and charts to make its arguments stand up. In the closing moments of the program a voiceover from the climate change sceptic Fred Singer claimed that the Chief Scientist of the UK had said that by the end of the century the only habitable place on the planet would be in the Antarctic and that “humanity may survive thanks to some breeding couples who moved to the Antarctic”.
Sir David has never made such a statement. It is thought that Mr Singer confused the comments with those made by the scientist James Lovelock, who infuriated many colleagues in the science community when he publicly questioned global warming.
Ofcom is expected to find that the programme made significant allegations against the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, questioning its credibility and failed to offer it timely and appropriate opportunity to respond.
Channel 4 argues that the organisation refused to cooperate with the programme-makers.
After the broadcast, Dr Wunsch said that the programme was as close to pure propaganda as anything since the Second World War and that he was duped into appearing on it. Martin Durkin, the director of the programme, has defended it vigorously. He wrote in a newspaper: “The death of this theory will be painful and ugly. But it will die. Because it is wrong, wrong, wrong.”
The producers have sold the programme to 21 other countries and a global DVD release went ahead despite protests from scientists.
Channel 4 claimed that the public response to the programme, in the form of phone calls it received, was six to one in favour of it. The broadcaster said that the documentary was a useful contribution to a timely debate, arguing that it had a tradition for iconoclastic programming and that it had also aired programmes supporting the case for man-made climate change.
A recent poll found that the majority of the British public is sceptical that climate change is caused by human activity, with many saying the problem exists but is exaggerated.
Ipsos MORI polled 1,039 adults and found that six out of ten agreed that “many scientific experts still question if human beings are contributing to climate change”. Campaigners believe that steadily increasing economic worries are denting public interest in environmental issues and some of them have blamed the programme.
Channel 4’s head of science, Hamish Mykura, said last March that he commissioned the film because it reflected the views of a significant minority of respected scientists.
An Ofcom spokeswoman said she could not comment before the report was published. Channel 4 said that it could not comment at this stage.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
It is not rocket science.
CO2 levels have been much higher in the past yet the planet cooled rather than warmed.
If the current IPCC conclusion were correct then the planet would have boiled and never been able to sustain life again.
I hope the public tire of being lied to and use their vote.
Paul, Epping, England
Global temperature fell 1940 to 1970, rose 1970 to 1998, fell 1998 to now (mid-2008).
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/hadcrut3vgl.txt
i.e. 40 years cooling, 28 years warming
The temperature's now similar to 1940 and theres 30% more carbon dioxide in the air than in 1940.
Hmmm
Richard S Courtney, Falmouth, Cornwall
Man-made global warming is a MYTH! Watching the program on Channel 4 was interesting, but it didn't persuade me to believe something that I already know.
Oil companies and governments want you to buy into the fear that our 'sky is falling down' so they can increase your petrol prices and taxes.
Mark, Maidstone, England
You say:
"... scientist James Lovelock, who infuriated many colleagues in the science community when he publicly questioned global warming."
But I cannot find any reference to this. Perhaps someone could point me in the right direction?
Jonnie, Ayr, UK
The last few comments show how far climate change sceptics have gone in creating mistrust. You are idiots if you do not pay attention to science. This isn't a question of freedom of speech. If you present a program that is factually innaccurate or masquerading as science, you should be apprehended.
Hannah, Buenos Aires, Argentina
When all these pseudo scientists are proven wrong about global warming and fossil fuels, can I have my money back stolen in the name of "Green Taxes" ? I thought not. These environmentalists are worshiping the devil in the name of God.
James, Dundee, Scotland
I applaude C4 to have had the courage. It is no surprise that certain people seek to punish them now. Persecution and censorship - ideally should not be possible in democracies. Pluralism, freedom of speech & thought are great , precious values.
Richard, Munich, Germany
Good on C4 for showing this, and shame on the BBC/ITV for their lack of intellectual curiosity.
We, as ordinary people, are at the mercy of our news sources. When a theory becomes fashionable, it is important that we are allowed to hear both sides, and only C4 has had the integrity to attempt it.
Darren, Flintshire,
In north we've had rain, a lot of rain. Never seen anything like this, it's been raining like this in 1913. But, it's been cold as well, particularly June was cold, no more than 15 of C on any day, well below average.
I'm not convinced about any warming, as I understood it should hit us first.
Pasi , Finland,
The public don't want to believe that global climate change is happening. Is that really a surprise? This programme only serves to prove that point. As peer-reviewed scientific evidence mounts up, and as more extreme weather events happen globally, the global public will have to re-think.
Chris, Nottingham, UK
So, if that type of programme is to be censored, why is the BBC allowed to show Songs of Praise every Sunday? Pah! So much for freedom of speech!
Robert, Slough,
Anybody who still denies that global temperature rises, glacial melting, sea level rises, CO2 and GHG build up, the risks posed, and that this has been caused by human activity in the last century; has clearly not reviewed the IPCC report prepared by 2500 scientists and ratified by 130 nations
David Bristow, Madrid, Spain
Many people seem to think that mankind is too small to affect something as big as the atmosphere. It is just common sense, isn't it? And yet we have already increased CO2 levels by over 38% since the 1880s. This is like putting on an overcoat in the summer. Common sense: this is dangerous!
Tony, St Albans,
Where has the freedom of speech gone in Britain? If I wanted to broadcast that the earth is flat, I should be allowed to and let the others dispute my statement. Global warming is a natural event and pollution will not make any difference. There are many reputable climatologists who say that.
Brian J Deller,, Marbella, Spain
Credibility for global warming - or climate change as it is now called - was lost when this labour government used it as an excuse to exert more control over us and impose more taxes on us.
Ian Bitter, Salisbury, Wilts
The programme makers should not be hounded for their side of the debate on global warming /climate change. If the climate models are correct, remember they are only models of our complex Earth weather system, it is only right that they should be exposed to rigorous examination.
Keith Davies, Swansea,
If only an USA TV network had the guts to show the program, we would a lest be able to see the other side of the coin and be able to make a intelligent decision on global warming. But alas it will not happen because the networks have to much invested in a questionable theory.
Don USA
Donald Haslam, lacey, USA
seems to me this is the only country that suffers from global warming......they got great warm sunny climes in the med and i am sitting here freezeing on a typical ENGLISH SUMMERS DAY.......GLOBAL WARMING LOAD OF OLD BALONEY!!!
SUKI, BASINGSTOKE, ENGLAND
The program is pure bogus nonsense and offcom are just stupid , ignorant and culpible in not being able to talk to any scientist with peer reviewed literature on thi subject matter. It has been scientifically dissed many times but offcom cannot see that I suppose and believe the public.
Pete Best, Northampton, UK
The fact is that this programme presented the other, relatively rarely heard, side of the global warming debate, and not before time. You can't be angry because someone shows you the other side of the coin.
Nicholas Burns, Leeds,
Most Geologists don't believe in Climate Change or Global Warming as the public view it. We see it as a natural process occuring within an Ice Age climate thats just been sped up by human activity.
Roy , Thetford,
Global warming is a fact, caused when the Earth orbits closer to the sun. Conversely global cooling occurs when the Earth orbits further from the sun. Both natural occurences. The arguement is whether manmade pollution increases this process. Personally I don't believe it does.
Charles, Port Talbot,
Far too many scientific livelihoods in the form of 'research grants' are at stake if the public should ever stop believing the scientists who are making a comfortable living from frightening them.
Governments also have a vested interest (green taxes) in keeping the public scared as well.
D O'Neill, London ,
this proves global warming/climate change is a fraud. The truth supports itself, untruth needs constant reinforcement.
remember, the control of carbon is the control of life.
paul , waxhaw, usa
Polemicists have ensured that they have this headline to point to as comfort.
Still, I dont see that "An inconvenient truth" can ever be shown on british TV if this is the reasoning to follow.
Simon, Leeds,