Patrick Foster, Media Correspondent
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
Jonathan Ross is to keep his job at the BBC after the corporation’s governing body ruled that senior Radio 2 executives were to blame for the broadcast of obscene telephone calls to the actor Andrew Sachs.
In its final report on the messages left by Ross and Russell Brand, the BBC Trust said that Dave Barber, former head of compliance at Radio 2, and Lesley Douglas, the station’s former Controller, made severe errors of judgment in allowing the material to be aired. Both have since resigned.
Despite also issuing a separate ruling against Ross for his use of language in an episode of his Friday night show, aired in May, Sir Michael Lyons, the trust’s Chairman, said that the £6 million-a-year presenter could return to work after his 12-week unpaid suspension ends in January.
“We are very clear that the Director-General has taken the right action with respect to Jonathan Ross,” Sir Michael said. He said he believed that the BBC had a “cultural issue” of failing to follow editorial guidelines.
In a report, the BBC admitted that before broadcast, no Radio 2 executive had listened in full to the episode of Russell Brand’s show containing the sexually explicit messages, which led to more than 40,000 complaints.
It also emerged that Nic Philps, 25, the show’s producer, had failed to submit a compliance form listing the offensive material in the programme before it was broadcast, in breach of BBC editorial procedures.
The trust said that the messages, in which Ross shouted into Sachs’s answering machine that Brand had “f***ed” his 23-year-old granddaughter, Georgina Baillie, constituted an “unacceptable and deplorable intrusion” into the private lives of the pair.
BBC management has since promised to set up a register of high-risk radio presenters, who will be tightly controlled. It has also pledged harsher punishments for breaching guidelines.
In a line-by-line account of the lax procedures that led to the broadcast, Mark Byford, BBC deputy director-general, described how a muddled conversation between Philps and Sachs led the producer to believe he had the actor’s permission to broadcast the material. Philps, whom the trust said should have stopped the show as soon as Ross revealed Brand’s relationship with Ms Baillie to Sachs, then e-mailed Barber, saying the material was “very funny” but he felt it should be removed from the final broadcast.
He added that Ross and Brand wanted it to be included and that Sachs had given permission. Barber listened to the extract twice, before e-mailing Douglas, saying he thought it should be included, with a warning that the show contained strong language. He concluded: “Are you happy with this as a plan of action?” Douglas, who was out of the office, replied with one word: “Yes.” She later said she trusted Barber’s judgment and thought that he would have listened to the programme in full. Barber was “adamant that it was not his responsibility”.
A BBC spokesman said that the corporation accepted the verdict of the trust in full, but Ross would face no further penalty. “Lessons have been learnt,” he said. Ofcom, the industry watchdog, is still investigating. It could levy a fine of up to £250,000.
Sachs’s wife and Ms Baillie said they considered the matter closed.
— The BBC Trust yesterday rejected a £68 million plan to stream local news footage on to a network of 65 regional BBC websites. Sir Michael said that the plan would deal a crushing blow to commercial rivals. “Although licence-fee payers want better local services from the BBC, this is unlikely to achieve what they want,” he said.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
There is becoming less of a reason for the continuance of a tax funded BBC empire with its millionaire stars. Channel Four began as far more challenging than any of today's BBC radio and tv networks, and to a certain extent it still is. Yet amazingly this one network receives no public funding.
Barrie Redfern, Zdole, Slovenia
Sorry, have I lost the plot, but who bothers to listen
to Mr. Ross's programme when there are better thing to do,
like get some fesh air, or do all your personal stuff.
Sad that we have to be dragged back to the lowest level.
Do we really care!
Stephen John Jones, Ryde, Isle of Wight
I think we are missing something here. The issue is surely the making of the obscene phone calls.An offence in law.These offences where committed by the two "entertainers", not the BBC executives.
Roy, Liphook, England
Laws on public obscenity were allegedly broken by messers Ross and Brand. Why are the police not taking action on this ?
Richard Lewis, Aberdeen, Scotland
Why all the drama?
Yes, JR did a stupid and peurile thing, and I'm sure he knows that.
The BBC knee-jerked and suspended him, a stupid move on their part, I feel.
Let him get back to what he does best.
Leave the man alone.
Martyn Taylor, Swindon, England
When Ross stated that he was worth 1000 journalists, that did it for me. It was a time of mass sackings in the BBC and they got rid of so many good journalists to keep this foul mouthed, arrogant, fool on the airwaves. By all means, keep Ross if you have to but give us a choice of paying the license
Marcus, London, England
Please sir,
Can I have my money back?
Ronald, Blackheath, London
Six million - thought eighteen million was closer to the actual salary Wossy commands? And after all this furore, the DG still considers he's worth that ludicrous amount does he? Vivian is correct - it is high time the monstrous TV licence fee was scrapped - once and for all!
Phillip, Poole, England
Typical! It's always the system that's at fault. The truth of course is that it boils down to personal responsibility and JR is the primary culprit and should face punishment accordingly.
Richard, Wellington , New Zealand
A cop out. At 47 years of age Ross should act like an adult. He shd know that his behaviour was completely unacceptable & not rely on other to take the rap for him. I have more respect for Brand, who accepted responsibility & resigned. Ross should go. He has no place on a publicly funded broadcaster
Donna Walker, Effingham, England
The BBC should be allowed to push the boundaries. It overstepped the mark here but the baby mustn't be thrown out with the bathwater. The nonsense that is being talked right now about swearing being banned from television is totally outmoded - it's over forty years since Tynan used the f-word.
jim, manchester,
You have been duped by this publicity stunt.Why elavate the profile of a female who performs blood letting and throat slitting acts in public.Performers express their talents to earn a living and entertain.Why would we want to promote bad taste and why would a women need to promote knife violence.
mike , Swansea,
I used to like Ross and listen to his BBCR2 show as often as possible before he started using people for his comedy.
I think BBC could find someone to replace him.
Phill, Cheshire, UK
I think it was disgraceful to pay him that much in the first place, and to keep him on now is beyond disgraceful.
Ellen, New York, New York,
We've heard nothing about any police investigations into the matter. Apart from the arguments surrounding the BBC broadcasting this, there is the very obvious matter that an offence has probably been committed by these two so-called broadcasters.
Rob, Amersham, UK
the BBC should not be allowed to continue with tax payers hard earned money to pay such obscene people. the licence fee now must be abolished and the BBC disbanded let them try to work in the real world, we as tax payers deserve better than the trash that prevails at the moment
vivian, valencia, espana
The pursuit of " youf " by organisations such as the B.B.C has been the downfall of some high profile names .
Entrusting censorship to someone with a more juvenile sense of humour than Ross and Brand , is fraught with danger .
Try someone with a few life skills next time instead of a degree .
Nick Dixon, Sutton Coldfield, England
What bothers me is that my Saturday morning car journeys from London to Lancashire to visit my grandchildren have been ruined because i can no longer listen to the sharp wit and humour of JR. I am 68 yrs old and detest the pious pomposity of BBC govs, Daily Mail & their ilke.
David Hooper, Chafford Hundred, UK
We all fail to understand the deplorable depths to which they sunk to do this 'as a joke' but surely the question should be why on earth did they think this would be funny?
Where are their morals/ethics? Why would this be entertaining?
Sue Taylor, Banbury, England
Sorry,where's the logic here? People further up the food chain (though not the immediate boy producer) go, but not one of the two oiks who actually committed the offence - and if the other one had not jumped he would probably not have been pushed.
Ross must go - it's very, very simple.
Graham Howells, Brasília,
Now that the adolescent filth peddler is to keep his job it will be interesting to see whether any top flight
stars will be willing to appear on his show. I suppose that only those on the slide and desperate for publicity will be prepared to be associated with him - `touch pitch` etc.
David, Wolverhampton, UK
I bet the BBC, acting in the license payers best interests of course, negotiated a contract that would likely pay Ross more than 6 million a year if it were terminated for anything other than wilful gross negligence. He could say that as the editorial management allowed the show to be broadcast, there was no negligence involved, rather the show was condoned by that same management....
Matthew, Bucks, UK