Frances Gibb, Legal Editor
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
Britain's artistic community is battling against leading auction houses and dealers to bring in a law forcing the payment of a royalty on artists' works for 70 years after their deaths — in line with writers and musicians.
Most auction houses and dealers are opposed to the law — claiming that it would have a devastating impact on Britain's £8.5billion art market.
The Government is to publish a consultation paper soon on whether it should implement fully a European directive that enshrines the 70-year royalty rule in law.
Artists won the right to royalties across Europe in 2006, but the British Government negotiated an opt-out on extending it to dead artists, first until 2010 and now indefinitely.
But Joanna Cave, chief executive of the Design and Artists Copyright Society, which operates the commission scheme and has collected £4.2million in royalties since 2006 for more than nearly 1,500 living artists, said extending it to dead artists would have limited impact.
In particular, it is limited to 4 per cent of the sale and capped at €12,500.
But Anthony Browne, chairman of the British Art Market Federation, which represents auction houses and dealers, said: “We would simply be handing over a large part of our art market to New York or Switzerland on a plate — because there would no longer be a level playing field.”
The family of the British abstract expressionist William Scott, who died in 1989, said the right to royalties could raise up to £200,000 a year — much of it for Alzheimer's research.
Robert Scott, the artist's son, said: “My father had Alzheimer's for the last eight years of his life while my mother was in a wheelchair for 17 years. They had very little income and had to be supported by me and my brother. During this time I made sacrifices and I feel it is only proper that we should now be able to benefit from our inheritance. I know of other artists' estates in a similar situation.”

Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Having studied Intellectual Property Law in France, where artists do benefit from royalties every time a piece of their art is sold, I find that it is a just system. After all, many artists' work is only appreciated late on in their lives or after their deaths, and their families should benefit.
Marie-Louise Murray, Godalming, United Kingdom
Surely when an artist sells something outright that's the end of the matter? This is not like paying a licensing fee every time a photo is published or record played. In those cases the fee is paid to the owner of the work.
Robert, Manchester, UK
Why not extend so a builder receives a percentage when a house is resold or the car, tv, etc. maker. Maybe the engineer or architect could be included. Why not the maker of a manhole getting something every time the hole is used. The idea is insane - when an item is sold it is owned by a purchaser.
Len, Guadalajara, Spain
Yes! Royalties, yes! It is done in every other arts discipline, and ought be so for visual artists, as well. A study into how it works with art and fair compensations ought to make it an obvious 'yes'.
Elle Fagan, Vernon Rockville Connecticut, USA
Some people think that the hard work by artists is waste but it may be to save the culture and heritage of nation.When ages change, the work of artist always helps to discover someting new in future. Further generations of whole word can take the benefits by work of artists .Royalty is justified.
Rajni Lotus, Patiala, INDIA
These artists and their heirs assume that art will not depreciate in value when, in fact, most artwork does. Would the same artists estates be willing to compensate the sellers if the work sells at a loss? Of course not; they want only the benefits without any of the risks the market must bear.
Brian, Brooklyn, USA
Why shouldn't people in the art media have to patent their work like any manufacturer has to and pay for that patent. Then the normal rules and laws of patent will apply.
D. Barrowclough, Burnley, Lancs
This is proposal is pure greed!
andy, london,
The Scott children already have benefitted from when the work was first sold. Giving them money each time a piece of art changes hands is ludicrous
Malcolm, London,
Artists should be included in the 70 year after death rule.
The Scott children will not be prevented from profitting from their parents work, the royalty payment will go them
Mary Hargreaves, London,