Miles Costello
Subscribe to The Times and The Sunday Times
Wealthy “non-domiciled” foreigners who have been in Britain for seven years face an annual £30,000 charge for staying outside the tax system.
Otherwise they would have to pay income tax on their offshore assets of as much as 40 per cent.
The Chancellor said that his proposals were aimed at “preventing people claiming that they are out of the country when they are actually here, from disguising income as capital and from claiming in effect two allowances”.
They are designed to force wealthy businessman such as Roman Abramovich, the owner of Chelsea Football Club, and big players in the private equity business to pay more tax.
Tax experts criticised the “non-dom” plan as confusing and said that it could undermine the strength of the City of London as one of the world’s top financial centres. They suggested that the Chancellor’s proposals, which include modifications to the so-called “90day” residency rule for taxpayers, could prompt wealthy businessman to leave Britain in droves for lighter-touch tax regimes.
Alex Henderson, tax partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers, said: “He’s giving non-domiciled taxpayers an invidious choice between a £30,000 flat-rate charge, which they must pay year on year, or calculating worldwide income and gains.
“On top of that, by amending some highly technical definitions, he’s tightening what will be counted even if you pay the £30,000. As well as the tax, internationally mobile individuals are going to have an increased compliance burden.
“This is much more than one would have expected for a consultation. We need to see the detail but people will be looking very carefully at their financial and personal affairs and trying to work out whether the extra tax is worth it.”
A spokesman for the consultants KPMG said: “Far from simplifying things, these new proposals appear very complex and will require a number of computations to see which basis of taxation an individual wants to claim under.”
Under the proposals, put out to consultation yesterday, any non-domiciled foreigner who wants to claim their status will not be entitled to a personal tax allowance. The Treasury said that this would affect about 113,000 people.
The charge would apply to individuals resident in Britain for seven years. The Chancellor also said that he wanted further to tighten nondom rules for those resident here for more than ten years.
Non-doms, he added, contributed £4 billion in taxes and any reform of the current system had to be “fair, workable and affordable”. But he attacked Opposition proposals aimed at raising £3.5 billion by imposing an annual non-dom levy of £25,000 as unworkable. He said that the Tory plans would hit just 15,000 people and raise only £650 million – a shortfall of almost £2 billion.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Overseas contacts and local business information

Find a course, arrange a game and save money
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Great Investment, River Views
New York Christmas Shopping
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
For wealthy Non-doms like abromovich £30,000 plus loss of personal allowance is nothing. Also not for big Labour donor Lakshi Mittal. However small non-doms like me with some overseas investments are getting hammered. For me it means I am out of this country before April 2008. I'll bet there is another 50,000 to 60,000 like me in the same situation. It is a lot of money to pay to stay in this country. I have enjoyed it here but it is time to move on.
Mr VdL, Hove, UK
At Law, Non Doms include every Pole, German, French ie EU citizen living in the UK, plus Anglo-Indians, Anglo-Pakistanis, 300,000 Somalis et all....... indeed anyone whom has a non British passport holder father. Domicile is determined by the nationality of ones father.
W Ulmann, Cambridge,
Sirs,
All the publicity generated implies that non doms are wealthy.
Some of us, like myself, having been butchered in the UK divorce court have tiny incomes barely over the current single person's allowance. These proposals merely damage us further and will eventually make us a burden on the state.
There may be a good case for those who misuse these provisions of non dom/residency including those who reduce their tax liability through off shore employer schemes but to wield a club to smash the vulnerable and weak and enable inevitably the wealthy to escape does not yield a fiscally or morally responsible result.
Mrs M Given, Toronto/Canada & Oxford/UK, Canada/UK