Marina Litvinenko
Win tickets to the ultimate village fete with welly wanging and more
I have asked my lawyers to petition HM Coroner to hold a full inquest into the murder of my husband, Alexander Litvinenko. Only a review of the evidence in an open, independent court in Britain will get to the truth about who poisoned his tea with radioactive polonium-210 on November 1, 2006, as well as how and why.
I do this against the wishes of the Scotland Yard and David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, who both told me that making the evidence public would prejudice a criminal trial of the chief suspect, Andrei Lugovoy, whom the UK is trying to extradite from Russia. But after waiting for 15 months I have come to the conclusion that Mr Lugovoy, a former KGB agent, will never be extradited. So I respectfully reject their argument. I cannot wait for another ten years for a slim chance that their approach would bear fruit.
I should emphasise that I hold no grudge against the police or the British Government; I am eternally grateful to them for identifying and naming the suspect, and then slapping Russia with an extradition request, which, even though it has not been successful, has squarely put the blame for Alexander's death at the Kremlin's door. However, this is not good enough for me. If I cannot get justice, then at least I need the full truth.
While the British authorities are constrained by due process and could do nothing more than repeat futile extradition pleas, the Kremlin has embarked on a propaganda campaign designed to divert the blame from itself. It wants to destroy the reputation of Alexander, a former member-turned-critic of the FSB, Russia's security service, and to discredit the allegations he made that the Kremlin was behind the assassination of the journalist Anna Politkovskaya and a series of apartment bombings in 1999 that was blamed on Chechen separatists.
Officials at the highest levels at the Kremlin have insinuated that my husband's friends in London killed him “in order to smear Russia”. In a scam worthy of the old KGB, a fringe American journalist was invited to Moscow for an interview with Russian prosecutors, who showed him the British extradition papers - the ones that I am not allowed to see. His “conclusion” - that my husband poisoned himself while smuggling radioactive material for terrorists - was published in a third-rate New York newspaper and then trumpeted in Russia as an American-sourced report. I have to protect my husband's good name from such dirty tricks. A full inquest would put an end to these kind of smear campaigns.
I fully trust the British police when they say that they have an ironclad case against Mr Lugovoy. But I am not the one who needs convincing. It is the Russian people who need to know. Mr Lugovoy professes his innocence, and none other than President Putin has cast him as a victim of “British colonialism” on national TV. Millions of Russians believed these claims, and now Mr Lugovoy has been elected to the Russian Parliament for an ultra-nationalist party that slavishly supports the Putin line. In the meantime, the evidence against him remains sealed in London. I cannot afford for it to remain there for ever. I need a full inquest to show both men for what they are: a murderer and his patron.
I am frustrated by the fact that Mr Lugovoy is the sole focus of the British indictment. With all the evidence against him, he did not have a motive or access to polonium-210. Somebody sent him and gave him the poison, which must have been produced, dosed, tested and packaged by someone else. Experts say that the Avangard nuclear plant in Russia is the only place where they make polonium-210, and that security there is so tight that it could not have been taken away without an official order. They also say that “nuclear forensic analysis” must have established the origin and the production date of the batch that killed my husband. I want the polonium report to be read in the coroner's court. Then perhaps Russia would have to explain how the material produced in its most secure facility ended up in Mr Lugovoy's suitcase in a London hotel room.
People tell me that disclosure of the whole truth would further damage British relations with Russia. Even a hint of Russian official complicity would put the British Government into an awkward position; after all, killing a British citizen in London with a radiological weapon is an act of war or of state-sponsored terrorism or both. What should the UK then do? How would Russia retaliate? Tens of billions of pounds of investments are at stake. Geopolitical balance is, too. Don't make yourself into a problem, I am told.
To this I answer: I am not the problem. The problem is the people who sent Mr Lugovoy to London with a weapon of mass destruction in a suitcase. If they went to such lengths to get rid of my husband, imagine what they would do if their larger interests are at stake. Denying this would not make the problem go away; it would only make it worse.
Russia will soon have a new president. Dmitri Medvedev is not tainted by the crimes of the previous regime. He says that he wants to bring the rule of law to Russia. He has the power to cleanse Russia of the people who killed my husband, but I am not sure that he has the will. If he dares not, he will become their hostage. But if he dares, he will need evidence, which is sealed in the Scotland Yard files. An inquest in London holds a huge promise for Russia; it might just tip the balance between the bright and the bleak outcome.
But the most important reason for wanting this inquest to take place is that I owe it to my husband. Many years ago in Moscow, just before his first arrest, he told me: “Marina, if something happens to me, you would go around the world and tell people what happened and why.”
I did not believe him then. He repeated it on his deathbed in London. He wanted me to go out and alert the people to the evil that rules in the Kremlin. I am doing this for him.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers


Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
F/1989
£36,000
Hollingworth At Ombersley
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
90K plus bonus plus options
Confidential
London
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
£40,000 - £50,000 + benefits
Lloyds Pharmacy
Coventry
£38k
Barclaycard
Various Locations
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Could we first take a look at something that can prove any of the accusations?
Alex, Boston, US
Alexander Litvinenko's life was placed in endangerment through his collaboration with Mario Scaramella to ferret out FSB KGB assets and undercover agents operating in Italy on behalf of the Mitrokhin Commission and when he collaborated with Yuri Shvets who entrusted to him incriminating dossiers on Russian businesses involved with crime families, corrupt officials alleged to have ties to the FSB and the powerful siloviki surrounding Putin. In Italy Litvinenko, acting on information allegedly from the FSB, falsely accused a former FSB agent of being engaged in an assassination plot against two members of the Mitrokhin Commission, a crime Scaramella was later convicted of planting false evidence The Yukos Oil dossier prepared by Shvets, entrusted to Litvinenko, who allegedly entrusted a copy to Lugovoi, was said to have triggered the state sponsored assassination of Litvinenko. The verdict on the evidence related to Litvinenko's involvements with Scaramella and Shvets remains open.
Brian K. Doan, Alexandria, VA USA
Well, Russian misanthropic thugs call Litvinenko traitor who betrayed his oath and fidelity to motherland. In other words, they attest they were behind his murder and FSB (KGB) was involved in this act of state-sponsored terrorism. What a shame for Rossia!
SERHIY, Lviv, Ukraine
Britain, like France and Germany, cowers like frightened child whenever they are compelled to face Russia. The Kremlin is filled to the brim with criminals, gangsters, and cutthroats- a mob of brigands has terrorized all Europe, whom they hold at the point of a gas pipe. Bloodfeuds playing out in Mayfair, Oligarchs buying up Chelsea and Knightsbridge, Russian bombers overflying British airspace- and how does No. 10 react? Slash the Royal Navy to such an extent that they couldn't patrol a child's bathtub! When the British finally get an opportunity to stand up to Putin's thugs, they choke, launching a cursory investigation. Demand all suspects be extradited, or force Russia to face trade sanctions and a NATO Censure! No, the British people themselves are to blame. Since 1918, they've fallen from pride, into self-loathing and despair. They no longer have the will to combat agression abroad, or to act to save their own skins. Europe needs a Trajan, an Alexander, a Napoleon.
JC, MI, United States
Dieter, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Thank God, that there are such logical and soberminded people in the West, as you!
Alexey, Moscow, Russian Federation
Oh, come on! It is easy to see what happened to Litvinenko if you ask his wife where did they get money to live in UK! He did not have a proper job! But he bought a house in London! He said Berezovski gave him the money to buy the house. What did Litvinenko give him in exchange? Or how did he manage to return this money? Obviously he was involved in smuggling of radiactive materials - that is the only explanation of how he managed to support himself and his family without having a job!
Alex, Moscow,
I donât know how many Russians have read that book, but documentary movie based on the book was demonstrated by central Russian TV channels. The FSB conspiracy theory by Litvinenko has no any rational, since everyone in Russia, in contrast to you, knows that second Chechen war started following the invasion of Chechen forces to Dagestan (august 1999) before the attacks on apartments (September 4, 9 and 13, 1999). Litvinenko also knew that but dancing to Berezovskyâs pipe told this entire fib in his book.
Alex, Rochester, USA
Iâd just like to clarify some points to the non-Russian readers. You may be shocked by the spine-chilling callousness of the majority of the postings by Russians. Here we are, commenting on a âpleaâ of a widow who has lived through such a harrowing experience that is unimaginable for the rest of us. But instead of sympathy and support, these people use the article as an opportunity to smear, malign, distract attention and in general muddy the waters. It looks like a pack of curs happy to show their loyalty to the master are nibbling at the wounded bleeding lion.
But you should not be deceived â these are the people who are hired by the Kremlin-KGB mafia to look through all the Western media publications and post their comments.
And 2 more very important points:
Litvinenko had NEVER BEEN A SPY.
Polonium was chosen because it is (was until this case) ABSOLUTELY UNDETECTABLE: the probability of it being detected was believed to be ânilâ, for several reasons... sorry 0 characters left
Victoria, Moscow, Russia
I wonder how many of the Russian contributors here have actually read the book Litvinenko wrote called "Blowing up Russia"? It is a closely argued and compelling account of exactly how why and where the FSB had every motive for organising those attacks on the apartment blocks and if Litvineko was not right about that, and the Kremlim cares so little about him, why then did Russia (1) ban the sale of the book there? and (2) pass a law in the Russian Parliament authorising the liquidation of people like him whether at home or abroad, who propogate anti State dissenting views?
I think the Kremlim not only was behind his assassination they made sure they acted within their own laws in doing so! Hardly could there have been a more telegraphed State assassination in history? Litvinenko was of course well aware he was a target, but still that didnt save him. I only pray Marina wll be luckier.
Alastair, Rye, East Sussex
These Oligarj types seem to be dropping like flies..
Why did Litvinenko carry on his Russian crusade after he became British? As a Brit he should have started a new life. and not endangered his adopted country's citizens and businesses by carrying on his old battles. It is like the Mafia changing their turf. He lived as he died.
This is not a matter for British tax payers. Mrs. L can get one of the surviving Oligarch's to fund her feud.
Kara Swart, London, UK
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
Next