Thunderer: Libby Purves
2 for 1 tickets to Singin' In The Rain, this coming Monday. Book now
Usually it is not worth contradicting reviewers, let alone thumbnail previews. But so many comments on Michael Apted’s film about William Wilberforce — Amazing Grace — betray whiningly dishonest right-on attitudes and must be challenged.
Apart from reviewers with the attention span of a goldfish (who call it “dull” because there are no car chases) there are two main complaints. They regret the lack of horror-film scenes of flogged and branding, and claim it focuses only on Wilberforce. Wrong: the film shows a whole group of campaigners, from John Newton, the former slave-ship captain, to Equiano, the former slave. It depicts allies like Thomas Clarkson, James Stephen and Pitt himself; and acknowledges the Quaker letter-writing campaign, the vast petition and the slave revolt on Haiti.
It does not show horrors, certainly; hence the ridiculous accusation in The New York Times, parroted by a BBC interviewer, that Apted “prettifies” the trade. Hence also the Guardian whinge that this is a “white man’s movie” and our own reviewer’s dismissive “genteel”. But for a generation accustomed to explicit screen violence and plastic fake body parts, there is actually more horror in learning about slavery the way the 18th-century campaigners did.
Like Amnesty researchers in periwigs they pore over sworn written evidence of atrocity and rape. Their fight was actually more noble because they were working from evidence and principle, not sentiment. They accepted — like Fairtrade campaigners — that distant cruelty is as unbearable as cruelty in your back yard, and that economics are no excuse.
Those who complain that there is no dramatised slave-beating belong to the same shallow cast of mind as modern politicians, who think that being photographed with orphans of war and then flying home is a substitute for working out how to avoid the damn war in the first place.
The focus is on the British campaign for good reasons: this is a political film. It is about vigorous parliamentarians in a vigorous Parliament, sacrificing health and peace to fight a ten-year battle for human rights. It is about principled people arguing against pragmatic fat-cats who made up excuses ranging from the “God-given” trade wind direction to the need for Newfoundland fishermen to have someone to sell fish-heads to, for feeding slaves. It is about a struggle which, thanks to Stephen, was won at least in part by parliamentary subterfuge: a Trojan-horse Bill that wrecked the profits of the trade. It delivers a shaming message to our own overwhipped and underprincipled lobby-fodder MPs.
Those who would prefer a soupy, sadistic Spielberg epic are welcome to it. Grown-ups will honour Wilberforce, his peers both black and white, and the director who gives them back to us.
Libby Purves worked for some years for BBC Radio 4, as a reporter and a presenter on the Today programme and, since 1983, has presented Midweek. She joined The Times as a columnist in 1990. She received an OBE in 1999 for her services to journalism and was Columnist of the Year in the same year. In her spare time she writes bestselling novels. Her opinion column appears in the The Times on Tuesdays
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Deaths & Marriage announcements
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
Up to £30,000
GLE
London
£
c£75,000 + executive benefits
Morgan Keating
London and South
Unpaid with travel expenses
Network Rail
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
SAVE 25% on Sandals Luxury Resorts
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The criticisms of the film show the same depressing tendency to judge the past by the standards of the present that we have come to expect from the modern meida, which seems to lack any sense of a wider view or a longer perspective. Anyone in the past who did not behave exactly like a member of the London media village (is it a village? A village is supposed to have only one idiot) is a monster. And this from people who cheerfully buy the products of child slavery and oppression in the modern world and ask no questions because the stuff is cheap and the companies make good noises, just like the slave traders did.
The best result of the latest round of hair tearing and emoitonal churn will be if we can reflect that perhaps we are now doing things that our grandchildren will look on with disgust, cheerfully consigning the inhabitants of the thirs world to hell in a supermarket trolley.
alexandria, Sheffield, UK
For all his energy, his religious zealotry, Wilberforce did not have the ear of the House as did Pitt. On the 3rd April 1792 Pitt addressed Parliament and in a wide-ranging speech on the topic of slavery he gave steel to Wilberforce's humanitarianism, by suggesting that Britain should take he lead in stopping the tade: "There is no nation in Europe that has, on the one hand, plunged so deeply into this guilt as Britain; or that is so likely, on the other, to be looked up to as an example, if she should be the first in decidedly renouncing it." It was Pitt, through his splendid orations through his short but glorious tenure of the Primacy that deserved the fame that Wilberforce was later to be regaled with. Without Pitt's interventions the topic would never have gained its credibility. Pitt also showed the awakening of ethical politics through his own deprivations and toils. If ever there were selfless individual who viewed so clearly and logically, it was he. A true great.
malcolm turner, Alsager, England
Excellent article. One must remember that most of the 'chattering classes' are of the 'evil dead white man' brigade. It is amazing the liberal rhetoric did not come to the boil all things consisdred. ! Aso, when will Henry Thornton get a mention?
Desmond Taylor, Houston, USA Texas
Mr. Thompson is correct. In fact, Apted played down Wilberforce's Christian motivations. "Too preachy," he said. (I watched the interview) Wilberforce & his allies did more that just change the policy of HM Gov't; they changed society's thinking about slavery. The RN made that policy a reality.
John Schedler, Seattle, WA
There is only one real critcism to make. The media hype and the film amply demonstrates the battle in Britain for human rights. However, the whole commemoration, this film and all, totally ignores the slavery we support every day by buying cut-price clothing in our supermarkets. If you really hate slavery, especially child slavery, vote with your wallet by refusing to buy the proceeds!
Slavery isn't dead and most of you are supporting it openly!
KR, Stockport,
It surprises me that most recent observations about slavery focus on the inhumanity of the traders and/or the courage of the abolitionists when, to me, the most important consideration by far is the passive tolerance of slavery in the social status quo of the time. There was the same uncritical support for the present that forms the backbone of so much of today's politics, or lack of it. We would do well to consider whether the line of least resistance in a non-political world leads, inevitably, to pragmatic immorality, and, if so, whether this is an outcome we are prepared to accept.
Simon Stephenson, Windermere, UK
Excellent article Libby. I wonder too if part of the criticism could be that secular crtics are uncomfortable with a film with a positive take on Christian faith by showing that parliamentary abolition of slavery was at least in part down to the role of vibrant Christians like Wilberforce?
Kevin Thompson, Reading, UK
An amazingly ignorant remark from Mr Holland there. The slave trade in British ships was outlawed 200 years ago. Slavery itself persisted in the British Empire for another quarter century. And elsewhere almost to the end of the 19th century.
Laurence Eyton, Taipei, Taiwan
Actually there is more slavery now than ever
Becca, Hull,
An excellent film in every respect; how we relished the development of the campaign on its merits alone, bringing to the fore Wilberforce's character and determination and Pitts political mastery and understanding. The absence of sqeamish horror shots and the usual degradations served to enhance the enormous struggle the anti-slavers had, ultimately bringing triumph. But this was only the beginning of a long and continuing saga; Christopher Holland, you are wrong, it didn't all end 200 years ago - there are millions of slaves today in 2007 and where are the modern-day versions of Wilberforce and Pitt - certainly not in Westminster.
Ian Maitland Hume, Greenlaw, Berwickshire
Slavery ended two hundred years ago. Get over it.
Christopher Holland, Canberra, Australia
What an excellent article. I rarely read fiction or watch a film but this article tells me that here is a factual and interesting film and I shall look out for it.
Roger Sykes, Christchurch, New Zealand