Matthew Parris
Get 20% off your bill at Pizza Express
A reader who followed this column throughout the Blair years would know that I always thought Tony Blair was a fraud. But I have less often remarked that he usually seemed a rather pleasant person: unvindictive, and often generous about others.
He was not instinctively partisan. Joining in the yah-boo stuff as the Commons required, he seldom had his heart in it. Tribe, doctrine and debate didn't really interest him, he was barely capable of grasping general principles, and there wasn't an ideological bone in his body. He shafted people cheerfully when it suited him but rarely got angry or bitter about the reasons. Strong beliefs, a conscience and staunch personal loyalties twist and embitter us; they get us all wound up.
Mr Blair had the sunny good nature of the truly selfish man.
Gordon Brown has the internally curdled nastiness of a truly public-spirited man. Here is a politician to whom struggle in a great and deep national purpose - though that purpose is tangled, paranoid and conflicted beyond coherence or hope - means everything. It is his life.
Riches, houses, cars, status, foreign holidays... personal happiness itself, are almost nothing to him. He is, in that sense, selfless. It makes him shockingly disagreeable. On Planet Tony all was for the best in a best possible world. On Planet Gordon ill nature rules and monsters roam.
So there has been, since Mr Blair left, a profound change in the political atmosphere, and it was very marked at Labour's conference in Manchester. Though calm, the air was weirdly sulphurous. Mr Brown engenders and embodies a new rancour - a bitter, personal, raving dislike of the Conservative Party and its leadership.
“They want us to believe,” he said on Tuesday, “that, like us, they now care about public services... They want to tell us we're all progressives now... they want to tell us they now believe in investing in education... [but] yes friends, they would even take away Sure Start from infants and their parents... If you look beneath the surface, you'll see that the Conservatives might have changed their tune, but they haven't changed their minds...”
And this all came after a passage in which he accused David Cameron of “serving up” his children “like props” for media cameras. From a man who had become the first British party leader to use his wife to introduce him on stage, and who, to the distaste of even Alastair Campbell, writing in his diary, had invited a friendly newspaper editor to the funeral of his own baby, this could be seen as hypocrisy of the most cynical sort; and that's how many Tories will see it.
But I don't think it was. Mr Brown honestly believes that the Tory leadership is wicked, and cares nothing for the rest of Britain. Everything the Tories do is then interpreted in this light. His own actions (he thinks) should be seen differently, as his intentions are good.
How should the Tories respond, gathering as they are today for their own conference in Birmingham?
Quite early on in Mr Cameron's leadership I was one of those who advocated a no-holds-barred Tory attack, arguing that Mr Brown was a weak and flawed leader and that the Opposition needed to ram this home, again and again, and mercilessly. It's not for me to judge whether this approach has been appropriate or successful, but I have never had a moment's doubt because I am sure that Mr Brown is bad not just for Britain but for the British centre Left.
And this confrontational approach is more or less what the Tories have adopted, I think to good effect: such good effect that, taken with on-the-record and off-the-record attacks on Mr Brown from his own colleagues, the damage that his reputation has sustained is almost certainly beyond repair.
So should the assault continue? After Manchester I have concluded that there is a strong chance Mr Brown will be our Prime Minister until 2010. David Miliband's potential Heseltine moment was more a Portillo moment and I fear he's done for. James Purnell is unknown and unready (interestingly, the Work and Pensions Secretary argued at the Times fringe meeting in Manchester that impugning the Tories' motives was the wrong tactic: Mr Brown then adopted it).
The repeated insistence of the Health Secretary, Alan Johnson, that he doesn't want to lead Labour may have to be taken at face value. And the popular leftwinger Jon Cruddas is a sufficiently dangerous wild card to make Blairites think twice about triggering a leadership contest in the first place. So Labour may end up with the worst of all worlds: a damaged, disliked - and irremovable - leader.
Tough for Labour. But this figure also happens to be our Prime Minister, and at a seriously nervy time for world affairs, global finance and our domestic economy. And there is more than a year to go.
So I'm beginning to wonder whether at this time, when Mr Brown's defects are now so universally known, that an opposition team readying itself for government should be taking further kicks at what Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrats' treasury spokesman, called “the twitching corpse” of the Prime Minister.
It may begin to look sadistic, irresponsible, lazy. It might not seem to rise to the gravity of the mess we're in. For Conservatives it could be counter-productive. Instead, a display of high-mindedness and good nature might better confound their enemy and impress the public.
So instead of trading insults, maybe they should respond with mild disappointment, sorrow not anger, and impeccable courtesy. They might accept in Mr Brown and his team a good faith that he is unwilling to accord to them. They should refer back to the PM programme on Radio4 after Mr Brown's speech on Tuesday. A focus group of Stafford voters sat through the speech, keying in their positive or negative responses throughout, on a scale of one to five. Mr Brown scored mostly fours, and the final verdict sounded, on balance, positive. But whenever (and only when) he returned to his very personal attacks on the Tories, the ratings dipped.
Name-calling irritates voters, even though, when it strikes a chord, it may shift attitudes. But more importantly, most floating voters don't think David Cameron is a nasty person or a lying extremist. Mr Cameron might ponder that good opinion, and take care not to disturb it by seeming to bully a broken Prime Minister.
Few have got more often beneath the skin of incompetent ministers than Michael Gove, the Shadow Schools Secretary. None has been more consistently polite. Now that the early Brown onslaught has been utterly routed, and their adversary is lying wounded on the battlefield, waiting to be bayoneted by a general election, Mr Gove's colleagues, too, might consider studied courtesy, sceptical inquiry and a hint of sarcasm, as their next weapon.
A Tory show of despairing good manners towards Gordon Brown may prove the winning strategy for what begins this autumn: the endgame.

Matthew Parris joined The Times as parliamentary sketchwriter in 1988, a role he held until 2001. He had formerly worked for the Foreign Office and been a Conservative MP from 1979-86. He has published many books on travel and politics and an autobiography, Chance Witness, for which he won the 2004 Orwell Prize. His diary appears in The Times on Thursdays, and his Opinion column on Saturdays
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£100k
The National Skills Academy for Social Care
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
£75k - £85k
Confidential
London
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
$3.5 million
Also avaliable for rent
Times Online Property Search will help you find it
Amazing Far East Offers - Visit Hong Kong
from £499pp
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Brown was way out of his depth as Cancellor and now as the unelected PM is just a disaster area. The tories have to do what ever it takes to get rid of this man before he does more damage. Maybe as a masochistic weirdo, Brown would not know how to react to some patronising behaviour.
Mark, Tynemouth,
I disagree. The purchase of HBOS by Lloyds has given Brown/Darling a 6% advantage over Cameron/Osborne. Despite the former helping us get here the great unwashed think they are the boys to get us out of it. No, the great British public is thoroughly desensitised. Keep kicking say I.
John Miller, london, uk
I think Matthew Parriss conclusion is wrong because it leaves Browns illegitimate and incompetent regime to continue for more mischief.
The correct strategy is to finish Brown off now using all legitimate means so that a general election can be held without delay.
Remember, half measures fail.
John Adams, London, UK
It goes without saying that most of the Country, if not all of the Country, know that most of the Country know where most of the blame for our financial mess lies.
However all of the Country gets fed up with Politicians criticising the other party. So Mr. Cameron please try not to do that.
Anne Kent, Dorset,
"is bad not just for Britain but for the British centre Left."
Anything bad for the British centre Left will be good for Britain. Why do so called 'progressives' insist that their way is the only 'correct' way - anything else is evil - despite the blatantly obvious failures. Including NuLabour.
Anthony Lester, Brum,
"Now he will be remembered as the worst PM in history who never won a general election. Even Major achieved that honour."
I don't think he has won any election whilst PM has he? Which is why we still haven't had the upcoming by-election. You can't suspend democracy because you might lose.
Anthony Lester, Brum,
Mr Brown is not so disinterested in riches that he forgot to bill the tax payer for his flat in London, right down to the cost of replacing light bulbs.
Dennis Lane, Cheltenham, UK
well thats all very well but there is a lot of anger out here in the electorate about being ruled any longer by such second rate ,disengenous ministers . The contempt is now real . The Tories have to show that they undersrand that . Any government that can be so breathtakingly insulting must go
nicholas hugh finney, london , UK
The Tories need to keep the pressure on Labour by tabling motions of no confidence in this useless PM, one after the other, until even he can't resist. Labour needs a new leader and we need a General Election.
Adrian Gilbert, Tonbridge, Kent,
Brown , is the scapegoat for Tony voter's
After 97 the gloating from labour voters was in the most, embarrassing because we all knew they didn't have a clue . The card with five pledges etc, now I ask those same nuLabourites and they tell me they voted for Tony , "don't believe in nulabour ",etc
Nick Dixon, Sutton Coldfield, England
The Tories should start forensically pulling apart Labour's policies, Gordon's promises about free computers/theatre tickets/nursery education - all unfunded - and challenge them on the country's finances/debt/credit crunch. There is no need to attack Gordon personally - he's his own worst enemy
Donna Walker, Effingham, England
Brown's speech to the United Nations yesterday in which he castigated bankers for the "age of irresponsibility" will go down not only as the biggest dose of hypocricy in recent times but also as the start of a campaign to deflect blame from where it really resides: with himself.
John Jenkins, York,
But Brown split bank regulation between 3 separate bodies, B of E, FSA & Treasury, none knew what their own remit was, nor did they know what the others were supposed to be doing. Thus no-one noticed N/Rock lending long & borrowing short on a dangerous scale. It was Brown's fault & no-one else's.
Rob Bryant, Bromley, England
'...studied courtesy, sceptical inquiry and a hint of sarcasm..'
Agreed; one should always smile politely, almost apologetically when slipping the stilleto between the ribs.
m collins, Leeds,
I think your opinion of Brown as selfless is wrong. Certainly as regarding status. He is ruthlessly ambitious and wanted to be PM. Now he will be remembered as the worst PM in history who never won a general election. Even Major achieved that honour.
tone, cambridge,
If we had the length of "War and Peace" to write here, there would the mother of all laundry lists of McBroon's failures and deceptions to describe.
McBroon is no towering intelligence - he is a fraud, with no public speaking skills whatsoever and not worth listening to, even on a quiet day.
Padraig, Perth, Australia
In response to the comment made by Mark Davies, Cardiff, UK:
David Cameron is a person of integrity - Gordon Brown is not.
The only thing as soft as a marshmallow is your brain!
Alannah cripps, Haslemere Surrey, England
The simple but unescapable fact is that much of our government resides not in Westminster and Whitehall, but in Brussels.
David, Chester,
Quite right Matthew.....The Tories must simply explain to the
British people that Labour means well and so spends lots &
lots of money on unreformed public services, which we
cannot afford and so borrow and in the end have to repay
with higher taxes. Thats why it always ends in tears.
Roger, Weymouth, UK
With Brown's demise, you will have the Union's demise which the Tories through their mouth pieces at the Torygraph and Daily Mule have helped hasten. SNP are on 42% vote share and rising, Labour are on 23% and falling in Scotland. The Tories are nowhere to be seen a fact often missed by commentators
Peter Thomson, Kirkcudbright, Scotland
I have learnt to respect your opinion on this I disagree. Brown is a redoubtable fighter (not just against the cons but his own) he could still turn this situation round - the signs are there. The public are going along with Cameron with only superficial support (more for what the party stands for)
David Cartright, Birmingham,
In reply to E Larkin. For one, you must not have read the stories about the 10p tax increase which has affected people like me, those who earn very slightly more than the minimum wage. I now work for £4.20 an hour after Browns tax increase. He taxed the poor for short term political gain.Disgraceful
Robert Duncan, St Andrews, UK
When you're in a life and death struggle you don't stand over your winded opponent and say, "Terribly sorry to have to knock you on the seat of your pants just then, old man. Got a bit carried away". What you do is finish him off. If anything, the Tories should be ratcheting up the assault.
Mike Armstrong, Macau,
I think you are right. The British don't like kicking someone when they are down. Its simply not cricket. The Tories, like Blair before them must show hope. "Things can only get better" To steal a phrase.
Peter Lappo, Brighton, UK
Err Matthew Paris most floating voters dont trust Cameron and any support is softer than a marshmallow. Noticed how quiet they have been over the credit crunch no offering on ideas as to how to get through this or is it that their far right capitalist ideas have been shot down in flames?
Mark Davies, CARDIFF, UK
New Labour is a spent force. Labour MP's either kill it before the electorate do. Mp's however are cowards no you first, no you. Manchester they showed it wil be the electorate. End of!!!
James , Brighton, England
I've been reading the Times for about 2 years. For the life of me I can't figure out why Brown is so disparaged or any recall any evidence that he has made mistakes of importance.
E Larkin, Toronto,
This is the first article in weeks, nay months, in which you have shown the much vaunted political intelligence your admirers claim you have. However, I doubt if the student debaters in the tory party can resist giving a good kicking to Brown. The future is truly bleak whoever wins next.
M.Paton, epsom,