Alexandra Frean, Education Editor
Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona
Students about to sit their GCSEs and A levels have been told by England’s new examinations regulator not to expect their marks to be accurate.
Kathleen Tattersall, chair of Ofqual, said that the public had a “simplistic” expectation that the marking system should be “perfect”.
But in reality inconsistencies in marking and exam papers were bound to cause variations in results received by different students of similar abilities.
“There’s a broad expectation that assessment should be absolutely perfect and accurate, that a mark of 50 is a mark of 50, regardless of who marks, the time at which it is marked and so on,” she said. “There is a precision expected of the system. We need to explore whether that sort of expectation is well founded, or whether within the system there are some trade-offs between absolute reliability of that nature and the validity of the way in which we go about assessment.” There were fears last night that her comments could lead to an explosion of appeals against exam results.
Last year nearly 22,000 pupils in England, Wales and Northern Ireland had the grades on their GCSE and A-level papers changed after they queried their results, a figure that has risen steadily as students receive fuller breakdowns of their marks.
She said that Ofqual would be carrying out a “health check” of the assessment system to iron out as many of the irregularities as possible.
But her comments angered some examiners, who suggested that they could undermine public confidence.
Greg Watson, chief executive of the OCR exam board, said: “We are disappointed that Ofqual has chosen to launch this work in the middle of the summer examinations season. The timing can only cause unnecessary worry to young people at an important time in their lives.”
He hoped that Ofqual’s inquiry into assessment reliability would go beyond “individual cases and anecdote” and would be “evidence-based”.
Ms Tattersall’s remarks about the reliability of exam grades are an open secret in the world of education.
The public expected the exams system to deliver “a true grade” for individual candidates at the end of their courses, she said.
This may be possible for papers involving “multiple choice” answers, which are very clearly right or wrong. But subjects requiring essay-style answers, such as history and English, were different.
In conducting its review, Ofqual, which is independent of ministers, would seek to examine a host of issues. “Would a student have received the same result if she happened to have taken a different version of the examination, on a different day, with a different examiner marking her work?” she said.
“How reliable are the assessments made by teachers of work undertaken under controlled conditions during the course?”
Alan Smithers, Professor of Education at the University of Buckinghamshire, said that while Ms Tattersall’s remarks on the reliability of exam marks were accurate, their timing was not helpful.
But John Dunford, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said that opening up these issues would lead to a more intelligent public debate. “There is an illusion of precision about exam marks, not least because a one percentage point variation can mean the difference between a grade B or an A.” A million children could be affected by computer problems that hit national curriculum tests this month. Floods of calls have come from schools after a new contractor, ETS, ran the English, maths and science tests.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Well i gave my papers this june 2007-08 and while i was expecting an A in Math, i got a low B. However, apart from that, i have received two pending results....
there has been hardly any change through the rechecking of the papers, and hence i have to give the Math paper all over again...
Shahan Lari, Karachi, Pakistan
Well i gave my A-level papers in 2005-06 and my paper was excellent but i received a D grade in all principle subjects in As and when i gave them for rechecking nothing changed.I didn't even get my marks breakdown report.Just got nothing.They said it's not available in your country Pakistan.
Sandy, Islamabad, Pakistan
Stunning. The timing must be deliberate, so why now? I can't see any other reason except it bring the system crashing to its knees. There will massive numbers of enquiries on results - .
Perhaps the point is to force us all to one exam board. Thank goodness I'm overseas running the IB and IGCSEs.
Ian, Lomé, Togo
20 years ago when I was a teacher (I escaped!) we used to enter our A' Level Economics pupils for two separate exams with separate Exam Boards. The variation was such that some pupils gained an A with one and a D with the other!!!! Most ended up with a high grade from one or other.
CR, Essex, UK
This is another awful story of this country's decent into mediocrity and apathetic administration.We know exam marking cannot be perfect but they can now miss by a mile and meet expectations.
"You can't pass me the can,i've got my hands in my pocket".
robert everitt, wolverhampton,
So my children have a better attitude to their exam preparation than the markershave to their paid employment! Either exam boards train markers not be subjective and to follow well set out mark schemes OR they stop setting essay questions.
Diana, derby, UK
Liz, that's awful! But surely Cambridge is at fault too, there?
Lucy, Chester-le-Street,
English students should be pleased that they can at least resit or get a remark if they suspect inaccurate marking whereas in Scotland, there is no such thing as a remark and your final grade is determined by a single paper at the end of the year. English students have it way too easy.
Melissa, Glasgow, UK
It happened to me, my a level exams were inaccurately marked and i found out after i asked for my papers back which cost me £15. When i tried getting it remarked early September i was told it was too late and they couldn't help me . Can u imagine i was paying the price for their inadequacies!
naomi, preston,
Must do better!
Peter, Brixham, Devon
Forget newspaper headlines; students were certainly not told not to expect their results to be accurate, and the Education Editor knows that. Anyone with half a brain knows that marking essays in subjects like English does not allow the precision of the tick box. Can we ever have a serious debate?
John Udy, Exeter, UK
It is quite easy to game an English literature exam because the aims of the teaching - largely, to introduce pupils to serious literature - cannot easily be tested. Attempts to make marking more rigorous only increase the pressure to game. Hence York notes.
Malcolm McLean, Bradford, UK
So ETS are getting complaints from schools. The Sats exam markers will not be at all surprised. They are all waiting to mark the scripts which have yet to appear from ETS HQ. It is now ten days since the Maths exam and markers have none yet because of disorganisation.
d brand, croydon, uk
Exam results by and large have always been inaccurate. There are too many variables to make them worth much.
judy, liverpool, england
So why have a system which can be open to "abuse'
Hamad Lone, London, England
Kathleen is saying it as it is; please don't pillory her for being honest and open. Examinations inevitably vary from year to year as does the quality of a small minority of the marking. The wonder is that such a vast exercise manages to produce pretty good results in such a brief period of time.
Geoffrey Carver, Surtainville, France
Judgement-based grades are always going to be open to a certain amount of discrepancies, but Ms Tattersall's comments are not only unhelpful at this time, but also a little defeatist. Better training for examiners, double-marking, cross-board discussions and accountability should improve things.
Ella, London,
Given the mess in the system, perhaps UK universities need to move away from conditional offers to unconditional offers. They have already seen the students GCSE results, their AS level results and - in the case of Oxbridge - interviewed and tested them again. That should be enough for an offer
Chottu, Singapore,
I taught for many years. Inaccurate exam. marking is rife, but - much worse - exam. boards so often refuse to own up to big mistakes on re-mark/ appeal. Boards retain re-mark fees if grades do not rise, and re-marking examiners already know the original mark. No external appeals body. Faces saved.
Gary, London, UK
The problem is only going to get worse with E-marking. An examiner cannot annotate a scanned script on a page, this is vital if the marker is to be able to look back over a paper and remind themselves what the candidate did well, or not so well.
Imagine marking hundreds in this way.
Matt Radford, Cirencester, uk
As a teacher within this system it is clear that the different examinations are being chosen by schools to improve their positions in league tables. A single government examination provider is required to offer reliable exams that are standard for each subject. Then a league table may be relevant.
David, London, Australia
Life has just been made easier and easier . If they can't achieve a set standard, the standard wil be lowered for the next time.After ten of fifteen years, thats what we have ended up here now.It is not only the standard of the pupils , its also the standard of some of the teachers as well.
Jim , Bradford, UK
Here we go again. Words words words. Another quango, more interference from the usual suspects. More taxpayers' money about to be wasted on politically correct enforcement. Watch standards plummet yet further under a welter of more micromanagement.
Sean, Droitwich, UK
The main problem with Ms Tattersalls remark is that she made it at all. She has sown the seeds of doubt in a fertile plain of suspicion where students and relatives may be all too willing to question or challenge a disappointing exam result.
This was her big mistake!
Dr Neil Scott, Edinburgh, Scotland
It`s little wonder that thousands of school leavers are neither numerate nor literate.
Answer, create yet another Quango, or NGO or whatever - and who will regulate the regulators?
We all know that exam performance can be variable, with many external factors like hayfever or stress.
Brian Thompson, Sutton Coldfield, England
Yet another great worry added to the educational woes of our children. How many children have been labelled failures as a consequence of this incompetence? Incompetent exam markers who are also teachers should be sacked. Random checks on exam markers' work and appeals will provide the evidence.
Des, Edinburgh,
3 years ago my daughter lost her Cambridge place because of poor marking. On results day she got AAD (she needed AAA) after the remark her results were AAA but this took 8 weeks and she lost her cambridge place and that at her insurance uni (offer of ABB). The exam board didnt even apologize.
Liz, York,
The country is obsessed by examinations which
are not apparently capable of being accurately marked. Coursework grades are often determined on the basis of personality rather than ability and the work itself is usually a collaboration. Pointless!
Steve, Argyll,
Is this government deliberately undermining our education system so that no-one will be employable?
SO, UK,
Why should they be accurate? Crime, unemployment, immigration, benefits details are all wildly inaccurate as well. It's called living under a lying cheating Government.
Roger, Surrey,
Set a low standard and don't bother to achieve it. The current mantra of the British Eduction System. Little wonder China complains about the quality of returning students. The devil is in the detail. Low quality for low standards. see current MP's as reference.
Alexander , Victoria,
We had this problem when I did my AS and A-levels a few years ago. One classmate received a lower grade in one subject than anyone else despite clear ability. It was discovered that despite the double marking policy, SEVERAL PAGES of marks had been missed out.
It could have cost him a uni place!
Eleanor, Yorkshire,