Get 20% off your bill at Pizza Express

A picture by the respected New York photographer Nan Goldin was at the centre of a police investigation into a show at a leading British art gallery yesterday.
Officers seized an exhibit from the Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art in Gateshead last Thursday, responding to concern from the management that it might breach child pornography laws.
Northumbria Police and the Baltic refused to identify the artist or the work involved, but it is understood to be an image by Goldin. She was one of several artists whose work was the subject of a recent police investigation in France into depictions of child sexuality .
Thanksgiving, her exhibition at the Baltic, opened last Thursday and is billed as a “micro-retrospective of her career”. Visitors enter it through black curtains and see images taken by the artist between 1973 and 1999.
Goldin ran away from home as a child after her elder sister’s suicide and has used photography to document and preserve the incidents and people in her life ever since. She gained a reputation as a chronicler of the lives of alcoholics, drug addicts and Aids sufferers, producing work of startling intimacy. She has since diversified into landscapes and dramatically lit still lives. She has photographed many of her friends and lovers taking drugs, making love, arguing, dying, fighting or simply waking up in the morning. She was admitted to rehab in the 1990s, a period that she recorded in characteristically unflinching detail.
A source close to the gallery said: “The police investigation centres on a photograph of a little girl which is inside a book. It wasn’t actually going to be displayed but was part of the wider body of work in the exhibition. The managers were concerned about it and called the police in to ask their advice.” Officers from the Northumbria force arrived at the gallery, a converted flour mill on the banks of the Tyne, as it was about to close after curators raised concerns with centre managers about the exhibit.
The image is now being examined by Northumbria Police and the Crown Prosecution Service to determine whether it is legal under the Protection of Children Act 1978.
Peter Doroshenko, director of the Baltic, referred inquiries to Northumbria Police.
A police spokeswoman said: “The circumstances around who may have been involved in the production of the image and who may have owned it or owns it forms part of the investigation.” She added: “We attended the Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art in Gateshead last Thursday at the invitation of the management who were seeking advice about an item for an exhibition prior to it going on public display. This item is being assessed and Northumbria Police, in consultation with the Crown Prosecution Service, is investigating.”
Last year Henry-Claude Cousseau, 60, director of the Ecole Nationale des Beaux Arts in Paris, was investigated over paintings, drawings and video-tapes by modern artists shown in Bordeaux in 2000.
Magistrates in Bordeaux placed Mr Cousseau under formal investigation after a complaint from a child defence group. The exhibition, called Presumed Innocent, was described as an “exploration of the ambiguities of childhood” as seen by 80 artists.
Works alleged to show, or hint at, child sexuality or abuse included one picture by Goldin as well as others by Annette Messager, Christian Boltanski, Mike Kelley, Cindy Sherman, Tony Oursler, Marlene Dumas and Carsten Höller.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£100k
The National Skills Academy for Social Care
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
£75k - £85k
Confidential
London
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
$3.5 million
Also avaliable for rent
Times Online Property Search will help you find it
Amazing Far East Offers - Visit Hong Kong
from £499pp
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
They have got to be kidding, right?
I mean, anyone who has ever been around kids can clearly see that these two are having innocent fun acting out a contemporary theatrical, dance sequence!
She's wearing panties and her private parts are not even exposed!
Is it porn? NO!
There are more skimpy clad little girls at public beaches wearing bikinis, and heavens yes...sometimes topless!
If a parent photograpghs them are they creating porn?
Of course not!
Whats next? ...do we prohibit little boys on the beach from exhibiting their nipples?
Robert, New York, New York
Art is meant to be thought provoking. When we are pushed to look at things we're not comfortable with, people have knee-jerk reactions. "I'm not comfortable looking at this, therefor there must be something wrong with it." Not, "Gee, why do I feel like this? What is it in ME that is provoking these thoughts?" So automatically the artist is the one to blame.
Look at works by Maplethorpe, for instance. His work is some of the most unusual and discomfitting I've seen. But I love what he does with light a, texture, shadows and forms. His work is incredible but many consider it pornographic. I for one, consider it to be art.
Granted, I have not seen this image but unless this little girl is exposing herself in some Playboy-style pose, then, I see no harm in it.
Maria, Melbourne, FL
Naked children used to be symbolic of childhood innocence.
What you see in pictures like this says more about yourself and your own perceptions.
Those who see this as pornography are the ones who are sick.
What's next? Are they going to ban pictures of shoes because some people have shoe fetishes?
.
Jan, Bath, Somerset
Then why not rape?..'treated sensitively' of course...And who says art 'should' do anything? Nazi and Stalinist regimes were always telling artists they should 'reflect society'...Surely it is up to artists to select their themes and how they express them, and for society to make laws that define the limits of public decency.
Robin Blick, Swansea, u.k.
The work was not on display, merely in a closed book that some voyeur from the art gallery was thumbing through. I dare say the police will be seizing depictions of naked cherubs from churches next.
Aden Brill, Hereford, UK
I don't agree. These photographs as well as other so called 'art' paintings in online galleries are not bought by people who wish to cover their walls with images that depict our social issues.
They are bought as sexual titillation by, and for society's misfits. To imagine otherwise is to be incredibly niaive.
By the same token, a racially inflamatory painting or photo, for example a white man beating up a black man or the reverse, would likely have been removed too although though that would also reflects society.
L J, York, UK
In reply to Julie â Surrey.
What is ludicrous is for someone to jump to the defence of art in ignorance of the content.
As you have not [presumably] seen the image how can you possible defend it?
You refer to such would should be on display when you do not know what it is!!!
Mark, Dudley, UK
Child abusers have enough evil ideas of their own without having these extra images with which to experiment on innocent children.
Eileen North, Winslow, UK
It's a bit more than just a naked child playing. The picture above does not show all of it. I can find no justification in what is basically a picture of a naked child with her legs apart for all to see.
Tracey, liverpool,
As far as art is concerned I don't think it is very interesting, fgs I get bored looking at my own familys photo albums. But i certainly don't think there is anything wrong or indecent about the photo. Infact just because of todays media obsession with child porn i think this photo should be displayed to make the point that it is no big deal and to make it clear to paedophiles that they are sick to be aroused by something as innocent as children playing! If all art showing naked children is banned it's just telling paedos that they are right to think of children as sexual objects! Some wierdos are aroused by shoes... should we ban shoes?
Daniel Gaunt, huddersfield, west yorkshire
More busy busy jobsworths at PC Plod's.Don't they have better things to do? Yes, of course they do.
Derek, Shanghai,
Have you seen the photo? I have & I have to say it doesn't look like art, it's something very different. It's hugely intimate in a way that's highly uncomfortable. I found it pretty distressing in a weird way and I'm very liberal about these things.
Sarah, Leeds, UK
It is ludicrous. Art should reflect society and we shouldn't shy away from these issues. If treated sensitively, there is no reason why such work shouldn't be on display.
Julia, Surrey,