Dipesh Gadher, Media Correspondent
Get 20% off your bill at Pizza Express
THE BBC has walked into a new row over the high salaries it pays star presenters by lining up Jonathan Ross to front the Baftas, the British Academy film awards, in February.
Ross, who has a three-year contract with the corporation worth a reported £18m, is expected to be paid a separate fee of up to £100,000 to host the glittering ceremony for the second year running.
The BBC, which will foot the bill for Ross in return for broadcasting the Baftas, is believed not to have considered an alternative presenter – despite the level of acrimony that has surrounded Ross’s pay packet.
Only last Thursday, Sir Michael Lyons, the BBC chairman, suggested the broadcaster had been too “meek” in responding to the demands of on-screen stars.
Lyons, who has commissioned a review of so-called talent costs, said there was “real concern that the BBC might contribute to inflated fees and salaries by responding too meekly to demands which reflect US realities rather than domestic values”.
In a speech to the television industry, he added: “It is important that the BBC does not use the privilege of a guaranteed income to overbid for talent – thereby raising costs for the industry as a whole and reducing the value delivered to licence-fee payers.”
His comments appeared to contradict the view of Mark Thompson, the BBC’s director-general, who has defended Ross’s pay deal, claiming that commercial rivals had offered him more money.
Other BBC stars boasting large salaries include Graham Norton, who is said to be earning £5m over three years, and Jeremy Paxman, the presenter of BBC2’s Newsnight and University Challenge, who is paid about £1m a year.
Ross, 46, took over presenting the Baftas this year after Stephen Fry, the event’s former host, decided to step down. His red-carpet performance generated mixed reviews despite the fact that he had reportedly been paid a considerably higher fee than Fry. Ricky Gervais, the comedian, said of Ross: “He nicked Stephen Fry’s job. At least the Americans knew who he was.”
One television critic wrote: “Ross looked neutered, his jokes were pallid and he accepted the unctuous thanks of Lord Puttnam for his evening’s hosting duties like a humbled flunky.”
Ross’s £18m contract covers his Friday night chat show on BBC1, his Saturday morning breakfast show on Radio 2, his film review programme and fees to his production company Hot Sauce.
Last week John Humphrys, a veteran presenter of Radio 4’s Today programme, highlighted Ross’s pay deal at a time when the BBC is planning to make 1,800 staff redundant after receiving a lower than expected licence fee settlement from the government.
A BBC spokeswoman said: “We are talking to Jonathan [about the Baftas], we want him to do it, but at the moment nothing has been confirmed and we have not talked about payment.”
BBC hosts with the most
Grade AA fee: £25,000+ Jonathan Ross, Graham Norton
Grade A: £10,000-£25,000 Huw Edwards, Fiona Bruce
Grade B: £5,000-£10,000 John Humphrys, Emily Maitlis
Grade C: £2,500-£5,000 Evan Davis, Fi Glover
Source: Jeremy Lee Associates (Approximate cost bandings for awards ceremonies and conferences)
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£100k
The National Skills Academy for Social Care
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
£75k - £85k
Confidential
London
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
$3.5 million
Also avaliable for rent
Times Online Property Search will help you find it
Amazing Far East Offers - Visit Hong Kong
from £499pp
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I think it was Shaw who said "all professions are a conspiracy against the laity" .
There is no better example of this than the "profession" of show business which is in the main a set of mediocre back-slappers talking each other up to keep the gravy-train rolling - in the case of the BBC at our expense.
It must be very difficult for these "celebrities" to keep a straight face when discussing their salaries and fees.
por, Burnley,
I suppose the good news is that 50% of the license fee payers money goes to the government in the form of income tax on the outrageous wages.
Jonathan L, London, Israel,
In Australia non of this would have happened, nor the USA.
Thankfully the UK, and all other European contries have some form of TV licence to prevent intellectual/talent bankrupcy! In fact the UK's version is one of the lowest.
Increasingly though, there is a section of 'middle england' that think BBC=TAX and unsuprisingly (as reported here) they are the demographic that dislike J.R. despite strong ratings on both shows.
D.H., Newcastle, England
Can anyone really understand what this man is saying?!? . . . "Wobert,Wupert, & Wachael are his friends you know!?" . . .
Graham Ottewill, Windsor, Berkshire
It's the culture we live in, and it's nothing less than vile.
Christiaan Briggs, London, UK
Peter - The only people who see Ross as 18 times more attractive than Paxman is "The Revenue" who will no doubt be rubbing their hands in glee about this additional "income" which they will get a slice of. And they will - many of the tax people are on "commission" now to drag in as much money as they can!
Another stealth tax?
MJ
M James, Lincolnshire, UK
What have these "awards" to do with the taxpayer and why should I pay for someone to " present " them?
This is one one of the silliest things I have read in a long time.Have the inmates taken over the asylum?
robert everitt, wolverhampton,
It's not the fee, but the 10%+ of £18million of public money going straight into the pockets of his agent.
Adam, Eastcote, Middx, UK
I cannot for the life of me see how Jonathan Ross is worth 18 times more than Jeremy Paxman
Peter Sutton, Hull, England
Ricky Gervais's quote completely taken out of context here. Ricky and Jonathan are good friends, and this was one of Ricky's famous jokes. I'm amazed this slipped through to be honest.
Paul Kerton, Birmingham, UK