Mark Henderson, Science Editor
Get 20% off your bill at Pizza Express

Women and men may genuinely think in different ways, according to research that has found subtle genetic variations between their brains.
Hundreds of genes that are switched on and off differently in the male and female brain have been identified, suggesting that many patterns of behaviour regarded widely as typical of each sex could be founded on nature as well as nurture.
Dozens of mental traits and skills are said to differ between men and women. They include empathy, aggression, risk-taking, navigation and the qualities that are valued most in a sexual partner.
The existence of such differences is now widely accepted, but natural and social scientists have long disagreed about the extent to which they are rooted in our underlying biology, or are learnt through male and female social roles. Women are generally more accomplished than men at empathising with other people, and usually score as more compassionate on standard personality tests.
Men are more prone to aggression and risk-taking behaviour, and tend to be proficient at understanding and devising systems, from car engines to the offside law.
While there are no sex differences in general intelligence, women tend to have stronger visual memories, while men are more proficient at visualising objects when rotated in space. It has been suggested that this may reflect the way most men like to navigate by reading maps, while many women prefer to remember landmarks.
Such observations have led Professor Simon Baron-Cohen, of the University of Cambridge, to suggest the existence of “empathising-type” and “systemising-type” brains, the first of which is more common among men and the second among women. Professor Baron-Cohen said: “This is a very original study, testing which genes are expressed differently in males and females across different primate species. It confirms the supposition that genetic sex differences are expressed not just in the secondary sexual characteristics in the body, but in the brain.
“Finding genes that are conserved across species points to the evolution of these genetic sex differences, and finding them in the brain suggests that they may in part influence the way the mind works, and in part influence our behaviour.”
Men and women also differ in their approach to finding sexual partners. Men generally place a higher value on youth and good looks, while women are often more attracted by status.
The new study, led by Elena Jazin, of the University of Uppsala in Sweden, does not directly prove that any of these traits is related to differences in gene activity, but it shows a contrasting genetic architecture of male and female brains that could plausibly contribute.
While the two sexes have the same basic genes, many of these are more active in the brains of only one sex. These gender-specific patterns of gene expression could affect many aspects of behaviour, the researchers said.
“The obvious question to follow is whether or not these signatures of sex in the brain have physiological significance for brain physiology and/or behaviour,” they wrote in the journal Public Library of Science Genetics.
“Our results suggest that variation in expression of genes in the brain may be an important component of behavioural variation within as well as between species.” The differences could also explain sex variations in mental health and neurological diseases: women, for instance, are more at risk of depression and Alzheimer’s.
“Knowledge about gender differences is important for many reasons,” Dr Jazin said. “For example, this information may be used in the future to calculate medical dosages, as well as for other treatments of diseases or damage to the brain.”The scientists said that their work needed to be followed up to examine whether any human behavioural or health differences were related to the sex-specific gene expression profiles.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£100k
The National Skills Academy for Social Care
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
£75k - £85k
Confidential
London
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
$3.5 million
Also avaliable for rent
Times Online Property Search will help you find it
Amazing Far East Offers - Visit Hong Kong
from £499pp
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I guess the new thing here, that indicates that the differences are really biological, is that there were differences between the sexes that were the same across the species boundaries macaque/human. These genes would be interesting to look into! We need every bit of info about the brain we can get!
Anna Hogosta, Oslo, Norway
Allow science to prove its theories, this type of science is in its infancy, as is anything to do with the brain, and how it works, hopefully basic facts, will be proved or disproved eventually, and the ego of both species then can adjust once actual proofs are there !
JONATHAN ROSE, Gt Torrington, uk
Who cares what the science shows? This is a matter of dogma, not evidence! Just look at what happened to the President of Harvard, effectively hounded out of office by the Harvard wimmin, because he suggested that such evidence MIGHT exist!
Nick, Rotherham, UK
Vive le difference ! ... or is it LA ?
kathryn, Middlesbrough,
You do not really explain the research but it does not appear that the research advance the old debate: yes, sure, men and women on averag show different behaviours, but what evidence is there that those differences are inborn and not environmentally generated? So, what's really new here?
julia, london,
Of course we think differently. The logic between men and women are so opposite, yet women still think they are always right. The problem is, that when women are 50% right, they believe they are 100% right. I could goon and on, but that would make a misogynist
victor arram, westcliff,
I can also confirm that they look, walk, talk, dress, laugh... differently
jayil, london, uk
Disagreed that this is blindingly obvious, and also think it dangerous to take it as such. Were it to be taken as such and not verified with experimental evidence, then it would be the work of pseudo-science; not good when criticising pseudo-academics.
Ed, Elgin, Scotland
After 50 years on the planet, I have never managed to relate the stereotypes to my own experience. For example, all the sociopaths I have known were women...
Perhaps the differently expressed genes will be found to actually affect different things to the "obvious" stereotypical traits.
Ian Kemmish, Biggleswade, UK
Jerome, London: why don't you go and look up a technique called 'microarray analysis' before you go and pretend you know what you're talking about?
Ingrid, Netherlands,
Sex differences in the brain are anything but subtle. Almost order of magnitude differences in proportion of IQ-related connectivity and processing tissue. Entirely different physiology re competition. And yes, women go for status, men for fertility (looks).
Steve Moxon, author, Sheffield,
The nonsense of a debate about nature vs nurture - the former based on 'hard' science (evidence based, testing hypotheses and refining the questions), the latter based on 'soft' sciences (subjective evidence and untestable hypotheses).
Social 'sciences' - up there with astrology.
Bill Q, Derby,
No suprise really, men think more by logic, women think more on emotion!
Pete, St Albans, England
Finally we have proof of the differences, maybe now we can mention them without being done by Labours discrimination farce (laws).
Scans have alreadyt shown that the make up of male and female brains is different by the different ratios of 'white' and 'grey' matter in Men and Women with the sameIQ
Dean, Southampton, England
Pseudo-science!
Jerome, London, UK
David, agreed this is blindingly obvious, but this guy is fighting a whole cabal of pseudo-academics who maintain that our brains are "tabula rasa" at birth and that it is nurture that defines how intelligent we are and how we behave.
sabremesh, london, england
So much of this is blindingly obvious that it is amazing that people can make a career out of discovering it.
David, Oxford,
Info time...Females speak 36000 words a day....'males' speak 18000 words a day...for the 'males'..one half of those words are 'yes' and the other half are 'dear'........
Mr tim, san marcos, U S of A
"...'empathising-type' and 'systemising-type' brains, the first of which is more common among men and the second among women."
Shouldn't that be the other way around?
Pete, Gerrardstown, W Va, US
"could be founded on nature as well as nurture." Why the 'as well as'? It has never been shown that nurture was the driving force. That was an assumption based on the unscientific assumptions of sociology, boosted by the advent of PC of course.
Bill, Suzhou, China