Nico Hines
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times

Verizon Wireless, an American mobile telephone network, has refused to carry text messages from an abortion rights organisation saying it has the right to block “controversial or unsavoury” messages.
The network has been accused of censorship and restricting free speech after turning down a request from Naral Pro-Choice to set up a programme where supporters can ask for regular updates from the campaign group to be sent to their telephones.
The other leading telecommunications companies have accepted the request from Naral, a pro-abortion rights group. Companies are forbidden by law from interfering with voice transmissions on ordinary telephones, but it is thought that text messages fall outside the scope of the law.
The loophole is the latest to come under scrutiny as governments try to ensure that legislation keeps pace with advancing technologies.
Text message services are an increasingly popular way for people to receive news and sport alerts directly to their telephones. Some political groups and charitable organisations have asked supporters to register for campaign alerts by sending a message to a five digit number, known as a short code.
Verizon Wireless, one of the largest wireless networks in the US, has ruled that it will not send messages from the abortion rights group despite potential profits from providing the service.
The wireless network, part owned by the British telecommunications company Vodafone Group PLC, already provides the message service for several Democratic presidential candidates, the Republican National Committee and Amnesty International.
Nancy Keenan, Naral’s president, said the decision should be overturned as it conflicted with the right to freedom of speech.
“No company should be allowed to censor the message we want to send to people who have asked us to send it to them,” Ms Keenan told the New York Times.
“Regardless of people’s political views, Verizon customers should decide what action to take on their phones. Why does Verizon get to make that choice for them?”
Naral supporters pay a small fee to receive messages from the group such as: “End Bush’s global gag rule against birth control for world’s poorest women! Call Congress. (202) 224-3121. Thnx! Naral Text4Choice.”
Jeffrey Nelson, a spokesman for New Jersey-based Verizon, said the entire topic of abortion was prohibited from mass distribution in the company’s code of content. The rulebook bans any campaign “that seeks to promote an agenda or distribute content that, in its discretion, may be seen as controversial or unsavory to any of our users”.
Nelson hinted that the policy could change, as Verizon’s code of content “was initially developed at a time before text-messaging became a mass-market phenomenon”.
“We have been reviewing that code for the last couple of months as text messaging and other multimedia services have become much more mainstream in American communications,” he said.
A spokeswoman for Vodafone in the UK said that the network never intervened to prevent a British customer from signing up to a text alert service, and that companies and organisations were free to offer such services as they wished.
How the new breed of location based mobile services can find your nearest cashpoint, restaurant or wi-fi hotspot
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


2006
£189,500
NW England
2008/08
£169,950
NW England
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool/Teeside
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Dining, Shopping & Riverside Pk
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Dear Donna, I'm shocked over your lack of knowledge when it comes to the american views of sex ed. They pour millions of dollars into theathing youths not to have sex - which ends up in nothing except a complete ingnorence of essential elements in this complex matter. I will not go against your opinion on abortion though, you have the right to think whatever you want, but please keep facts in mind when writing about the article. It said that the group sent messages to people who had already voulenteered to recieve the news and that they did not to use it as means to spread their views.
Eira, Stockholm, Sweden
So long as there are other phone companies who will carry the messages then we can always vote with our pocketbook. I would not use Verizon and don't plan to. When communication companies try to stifle communication, they become irrelavent.
Julia, Austin, Texas
I can not make an educated statement about when a fetus has self -awarness. But I can tell you what I do know for a fact . I went into preterm labor and I gave birth to a precious baby boy at 20 weeks gestation . I was told by my doctor that he would be born DEAD. He weighed in at 8 oz. and was 8 inches long he was so fragile , you could see right through his skin.He had black hair and I could already tell he was go look just like his Daddy .He lived four hours and he struggled and fought to LIVE. Some women have had abortions at this stage and it is just wrong ! And this is just my opinion NOT the religous fantasy of the State of South Carolina ! June Wevertown, NY.
Donna, Cades, SC
Keri, me too. I only wish some others didn't live here as well.
Rusty, Houston, TX
Boycott Verizon. They cannot dictate others' beliefs. They apparently know in Las Vegas that political stands are just religious fanaticism in this case.
Glen, Brant Lake, NY
Rightfully, Verizon has reversed itself, citing an isolated error in judgment. Not swayed by South Carolina religious fantasy, they have restored the Pro-Choice world to its rights.
June, Wevertown, NY
It's Verizons network they can send or not send what they choose.
Joe , Sand Springs, Oklahoma,USA
OUTRAGEOUS!
They're a freaking phone company, nothing more or less. Do they disconnect phone calls based on content, as well?
I'm guessing not.
gary, Austin, USA
I stand behind Verizon Wireless 100% ! I wish other Networks would do the same. "Pro Choice America "they chant like idots ! They had a choice (use protection or no protection)
and they made their choice ! Think people , THINK ! Sex education is being taught in elementary school , health department gives out condoms , birth control pills and they have family planing programs and the list goes on and on . But instead of these protesters chanting about stopping unwanted preganceys they are chanting for people to have the right to KILL innocent helpless babies that did not ask to be concieved in the first place . NO ONE and I repeat NO one should be giving the right to kill ! IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO GET PREGNANT IT IS SIMPLE DO NOT HAVE UNPROTECTED SEX !I do believe that if someone has been raped or a victim of incest , small children that has had horrible things done to them should have help if needed,but for grown women who have the resoures to provent preganceys .
Donna, Cades, SC
I trust that Verizon would also ban 'pro-life' messages? Refusing abortion rights is equally controversial and unsavoury to many.
Or does it have some neo-con bible belt agenda of which George W would secretly approve?
David Harrison, Manchester, UK
Thank you Verizon for that stand which will or could add more spam to our lives.
Jo, Verizon customer
Jo, Hightstown , NJ
The larger a corporate presence a company maintains, particularly one involved in the distribution of information, the less the company has a right to limit public access to information. In fact, in grows into a duty to disseminate ideas in the pursuit of a free exchange of ideas.
Verizon has no right to describe Naral's message as unsavory and it has no right to limit its consumers access to information they need to know as voters particularly since Verizon needs to actively block the message.
What it has done is take a political stand and forced its users to comply with that point of view and that is an unsavory and controversial message.
Kim Idol, Las Vegas, Nevada
Im so glad i dont live in America.
Keri, London,
In 1994, there was a message sent out over the air waves that initiated the call to arms for many people in Rwanda. 100 days later, over 800,000 people lay dead on the roadways, in homes, churches, etc.
Does there need to be guidelines placed on use of airwaves (text messages, radio, television or otherwise)?
The facts speak louder than opinion.
Barbara Peters, Tallahassee, FL
Censorship in any form is unacceptable.I dropped Verison and urge others to do the same.
Mark Francisco, Richmond, Ky
If you've been keeping up with the abortion debate in this country, you have no doubt heard some very interesting claims made by anti-abortion activists. Some of these claims need to be taken seriously, but others...well, not so much. In the spirit of raising the level of discourse, here are ten provably false claims that anti-abortion activists really need to stop repeating.
01. "Human life begins at conception."
False. Human life actually begins prior to conception, because each sperm and egg cell is a living organism. It is more relevant to discuss when sentience, or self-awareness, begins. In 2000, the British House of Lords established a Commission of Inquiry into Fetal Sentience, which estimated that higher-level brain development begins to commence at about 23 weeks.
Jerome Thomas, Seattle, WA
Go Verizon!
Roy Cox, Philpot, KY